11.07.2016 Views

130925-studie-wildlife-comeback-in-europe

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 1a.<br />

Distribution of Red<br />

deer <strong>in</strong> the 1800s [56] ,<br />

1955 [57] and 2008 [26] .<br />

Please note that the<br />

range depicted for<br />

1955 <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> may be<br />

larger than the actual<br />

distribution of the<br />

species [31] .<br />

Figure 1b.<br />

Map highlight<strong>in</strong>g<br />

areas of range<br />

expansion,<br />

persistence and<br />

contraction for<br />

Red deer <strong>in</strong> Europe<br />

between 1955 and<br />

2008. Please note<br />

that some of the<br />

change observed<br />

from 1955 to 2008<br />

is likely to be an<br />

artefact of the<br />

difference <strong>in</strong> map<br />

resolution, for<br />

example for the<br />

United K<strong>in</strong>gdom and<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong>.<br />

<strong>in</strong> abundance of just under 400% (Figure 2).<br />

Recovery was greatest <strong>in</strong> the 1960s (120%), after<br />

which the decadal growth dropped to around<br />

30% for the follow<strong>in</strong>g two decades, and around 5%<br />

thereafter (Figure 2). This is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the largescale<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases described throughout most of the<br />

deer’s European range <strong>in</strong> the 1950s to 1970s [9] , with<br />

the notable exception of Greece [38] and Serbia [48] .<br />

The abundance trend is based on 21 populations<br />

from the species’ current range, represent<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum of 512,000 <strong>in</strong>dividuals or 21% of the<br />

total estimated European population. Data were<br />

available from around half of all countries of occurrence,<br />

but lack<strong>in</strong>g from those harbour<strong>in</strong>g particularly<br />

large populations such as Germany and<br />

Austria (100,000+ <strong>in</strong>dividuals), as well as Denmark,<br />

Sweden and Latvia (10,000+ <strong>in</strong>dividuals).<br />

Drivers of recovery<br />

In our data set, recovery <strong>in</strong> protected populations<br />

correlated with the IUCN category of the<br />

protected area, with only category V areas show<strong>in</strong>g<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!