Recent developments As discussed above, Roe deer account for a large proportion of vehicle collision accidents <strong>in</strong> many European countries, for example <strong>in</strong> Germany [37] . The number of <strong>in</strong>dividuals killed on roads is likely to rise <strong>in</strong> future, due both to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g deer population density and cont<strong>in</strong>ued fragmentation of the landscape through <strong>in</strong>frastructure development. In addition, Europe’s large predators are mak<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>comeback</strong> <strong>in</strong> many regions, which may have an impact on Roe deer population size <strong>in</strong> some areas. There is also grow<strong>in</strong>g evidence that the species can be outcompeted by the sympatric Red deer. For example, Roe deer numbers are suppressed <strong>in</strong> areas with high Red deer density <strong>in</strong> Scotland [48] and Portugal [49] , while Roe fawns show lower body mass <strong>in</strong> areas where Red deer are present [50] . The ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of Roe deer populations may thus not be compatible with artificial restock<strong>in</strong>g of areas with other ungulates or with the natural <strong>in</strong>crease of wild and domestic ungulate species [41] . While this issue is unlikely to affect the species as a whole, it could be a concern at a local level, and should be taken <strong>in</strong>to account when design<strong>in</strong>g community composition <strong>in</strong> rewild<strong>in</strong>g areas [41] . Overall, however, the Roe deer is not fac<strong>in</strong>g any major threats [3, 15] and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g both globally [3] and <strong>in</strong> Europe [15] . Because the species has already made the successful shift from forest to more open landscapes, it has probably colonised all available habitat across Europe, and is therefore unlikely to show further range expansion <strong>in</strong> the future. In many countries, densities may still rise, but <strong>in</strong>creases are not expected everywhere, e.g. <strong>in</strong> Slovenia [29] or at the southern edge of its range <strong>in</strong> Iberia [51] . 72
References 1. Apollonio, M., R. Andersen, and R. Putman, eds (2010) European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. 2. Danilk<strong>in</strong>, A. (1996) Behavioural ecology of Siberian and European roe deer. Wildlife Ecology and Behaviour Series. Vol. 2. i-xvi, 1–277. 3. IUCN (2011a) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [cited 2011; 2011.1:[Available from: http://www.iucnredlist.org/. 4. Wilson, D.E. and D.M. Reeder (2005) Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Third Edition, Baltimore: The Johns Hopk<strong>in</strong>s University Press. 5. Macdonald, D.W. and P. Barrett (1993) Mammals of Brita<strong>in</strong> and Europe, London: Coll<strong>in</strong>s. 6. Kjellander, P. (2000) Density Dependence <strong>in</strong> Roe Deer Population Dynamics, <strong>in</strong> Department of Conservation Biology, Swedish Univeristy of Agricultural Sciences: Uppsala. p. 30. 7. Sempéré, A.J., V.E. Sokolov, and A.A. Danilk<strong>in</strong> (1996) Mammalian Species: Capreolus capreolus. American Society of Mammalogists, 538: 1–9. 8. Putman, R. (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Great Brita<strong>in</strong> and Ireland, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 129–164. 9. Gill, R. (2013) Pers. comm. 10. Wawrzyniak, P., et al. (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Poland, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 11. Bartoš, L., R. Kotrba, and J. P<strong>in</strong>tíř (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the Czech Republic, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 12. Burbaitė, L. and S. Csányi (2009) Roe deer population and harvest changes <strong>in</strong> Europe. Estonian Journal of Ecology, 258(3): 169–180. 13. Gill, R. (1990) Monitor<strong>in</strong>g the status of European and North American cervids. 14. Council of Europe (1979) CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS, <strong>in</strong> European Treaties Series. 15. IUCN (2011b) European Red List. Available from: http://www.iucnredlist.org/<strong>in</strong>itiatives/ <strong>europe</strong>/<strong>europe</strong>an-red-list-site. 16. IUCN/Zoological Society of London National Red List. Available from: http://www.nationalredlist.org/. 17. Andersen, R. and V. Holthe (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Denmark, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 71–85. 18. Andersone-Lilley, Ž., et al. (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the Baltics (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania), <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 19. Maillard, D., et al. (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> France, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 20. Wotschikowsky, U. (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Germany, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 21. Csányi, S. and R. Lehoczki (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Hungary, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 291–318. 22. Apollonio, M., et al. (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Italy, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 23. van Wieren, S.E. and G.W.T.A. Groot Bru<strong>in</strong>der<strong>in</strong>k (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 165–183. 24. Andersen, R., et al. (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Norway, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 25. V<strong>in</strong>gada, J., et al. (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Portugal, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 392–418. 26. Micu, I., et al. (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Romania, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 319–337. 27. Paunović, M., D. Ćirović, and J.D.C. L<strong>in</strong>nell (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Serbia, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 563–571. 28. F<strong>in</strong>do, S. and M. Skuban (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Slovakia, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 29. Adamic, M. and K. Jer<strong>in</strong>a (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Slovenia, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 507–526. 30. Carranza, J. (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 419–440. 31. Liberg, O., et al. (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Sweden, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 32. Imesch-Bebié, N., H. Gander, and R. Schnidrig-Petrig (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Switzerland, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. 33. Reimoser, F. and S. Reimoser (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Austria, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 338–356. 34. Casaer, J. and A. Licoppe (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Belgium, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 184–200. 35. Kusak, J. and K. Krap<strong>in</strong>ec (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Croatia, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 527–539. 36. Deutscher Jagdschutzverband (2013) Jahresjagdstrecke Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2011/12. 37. Deutscher Jagdschutzverband (2013) Wildunfall-Statistik 2011/2012. 38. Kaluz<strong>in</strong>ski, I. (1982) Dynamics and structure of a field roe deer population. Acta Theriologica, 27: 385–408. 39. Maillard, D., et al. (1999) Le retour des grands mammifères sauvages dans la région méditerranéenne française. Forêt Méditerranéenne, 20: 9–15. 40. Royo, L.J., et al. (2007) Genetic variability and differentiation <strong>in</strong> Spanish roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): A phylogeographic reassessment with<strong>in</strong> the European framework. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 42: 47–61. 41. Carranza, J. (2013) Pers. comm. 42. Andersen, R., I. Herf<strong>in</strong>dal, and B.E. Saether (2004) When range expansion rate is faster <strong>in</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>al habitats. Oikos, 107(1): 210–214. 43. Ward, A.I. (2005) Expand<strong>in</strong>g ranges of wild and feral deer <strong>in</strong> Great Brita<strong>in</strong>. Mammal Review, 35(2): 165–173. 44. Karand<strong>in</strong>os, M. and L. Paraschi (1992) The red data book of threatened vertebrates of Greece, Athens, Greece: Hellenic Zoological Society and Hellenic Ornithological Society. 45. Stojanov, A., et al. (2010) Ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> Macedonia, <strong>in</strong> European ungulates and their management <strong>in</strong> the 21st century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman, Editors., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. p. 572–577. 46. van den Br<strong>in</strong>k, F.H. (1967) A field guide to the mammals of Brita<strong>in</strong> and Europe, London, UK: Coll<strong>in</strong>s & Sons. 47. Aragón, S., F. Braza, and C. San Jose (1995) Historical exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the distribution of large mammals <strong>in</strong> Aragón, Northeastern Spa<strong>in</strong>. Acta Theriologica, 40: 37–43. 48. Latham, J. and B.W. Sta<strong>in</strong>es (1997) Correlations of red (Cervus elaphus) and roe (Capreolus capreolus) deer densities <strong>in</strong> Scottish forests with environmental variables. Journal of Zoology, 242: 681–704. 49. Torres, R.T., et al. (2012) Habitat use by sympatric red and roe deer <strong>in</strong> a Mediterranean ecosystem. Animal Biology, 62: 351–366. 50. Richard, E., et al. (2010) High red deer density depresses body mass of roe deer fawns. Oecologia, 163: 91–97. 51. Virgós, E. and J.L. Tellería (1998) Roe deer habitat selection <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong>: constra<strong>in</strong>ts on the distribution of a species. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 76: 1294–1299. Reviewers • Dr Juan Carranza • Dr Rob<strong>in</strong> M. A. Gill • Dr John E. Jackson 73
- Page 1 and 2:
Stefanie Deinet Christina Ieronymid
- Page 3 and 4:
Wildlife comeback in Europe The rec
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of contents Foreword . . . .
- Page 7:
Foreword Shifting baselines In Euro
- Page 10 and 11:
The Adriatic coastline of the Veleb
- Page 12 and 13:
96 year old olive farmer with his d
- Page 14 and 15:
12
- Page 16 and 17:
Limitations of population trend dat
- Page 18 and 19:
Constructing historical distributio
- Page 20 and 21:
Red deer at the Oostvaardersplassen
- Page 22 and 23:
Table 2. Definitions of classificat
- Page 24 and 25: 22
- Page 26 and 27: 3.1. European bison Bison bonasus S
- Page 28 and 29: Table 2. Latest population estimate
- Page 30 and 31: Figure 1c. Map highlighting areas o
- Page 32 and 33: Rank Reason for change Description
- Page 34 and 35: 3.2. Alpine ibex Capra ibex Summary
- Page 36 and 37: Figure 1a. Distribution of Alpine i
- Page 38 and 39: % change 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Fig
- Page 40 and 41: 3.3. Iberian ibex Capra pyrenaica S
- Page 42 and 43: Figure 1a. Distribution of Iberian
- Page 44 and 45: Rank Reason for change Description
- Page 46 and 47: 3.4. Southern chamois Rupicapra pyr
- Page 48 and 49: Figure 1a. Distribution of Southern
- Page 50 and 51: Rank Reason for change Description
- Page 52 and 53: 3.5. Northern chamois Rupicapra rup
- Page 54 and 55: Scale Status Population trend Justi
- Page 56 and 57: % change 80 60 40 20 0 and Italy [2
- Page 58 and 59: Subspecies balcanica Exploitation B
- Page 60 and 61: 3.6. Eurasian elk Alces alces Summa
- Page 62 and 63: Figure 1a. Distribution of Eurasian
- Page 64 and 65: Poland [10] and Estonia [28] . It i
- Page 66 and 67: References 1. Geist, V. 1998. Deer
- Page 68 and 69: 3.7. Roe deer Capreolus capreolus S
- Page 70 and 71: Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 72 and 73: Figure 2. Change in Roe deer popula
- Page 76 and 77: 3.8. Red deer Cervus elaphus Summar
- Page 78 and 79: Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 80 and 81: % change 750 600 450 300 150 0 Figu
- Page 82 and 83: lineages for the local area and min
- Page 84 and 85: 3.9. Wild boar Sus scrofa Summary T
- Page 86 and 87: Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 88 and 89: Abundance and distribution: changes
- Page 90 and 91: References 1. IUCN 2011a. The IUCN
- Page 92 and 93: 3.10. Golden jackal Canis aureus Su
- Page 94 and 95: Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 96 and 97: Recent developments Table 3. Major
- Page 98 and 99: 3.11. Grey wolf Canis lupus Summary
- Page 100 and 101: Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 102 and 103: Drivers of recovery Figure 2. Distr
- Page 104 and 105: References 1. Mech, L.D. & Boitani,
- Page 106 and 107: 3.12. Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx Summa
- Page 108 and 109: Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 110 and 111: % change 750 600 450 300 150 0 Figu
- Page 112 and 113: Figure 3. Map of recent development
- Page 114 and 115: 3.13. Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus Su
- Page 116 and 117: Figure 1a. Distribution of the Iber
- Page 118 and 119: Table 3. Major reasons for positive
- Page 120 and 121: 18. IUCN 2011b. European Red List.
- Page 122 and 123: 3.14. Wolverine Gulo gulo Summary T
- Page 124 and 125:
Figure 1a. Distribution of Wolverin
- Page 126 and 127:
Rank Reason for change Description
- Page 128 and 129:
3.15. Grey seal Halichoerus grypus
- Page 130 and 131:
Estimate assessed Reference Global
- Page 132 and 133:
% change 1500 1200 900 600 300 0 Fi
- Page 134 and 135:
3.16. Harbour seal Phoca vitulina S
- Page 136 and 137:
east coast, the distribution is res
- Page 138 and 139:
% change 200 150 100 50 0 populatio
- Page 140 and 141:
Figure 3. Map of recent development
- Page 142 and 143:
3.17. Brown bear Ursus arctos Summa
- Page 144 and 145:
Table 2. Latest population estimate
- Page 146 and 147:
144
- Page 148 and 149:
Recent developments % change 200 15
- Page 150 and 151:
mation, e.g. between Slovenia and C
- Page 152 and 153:
3.18. Eurasian beaver Castor fiber
- Page 154 and 155:
Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 156 and 157:
% change 20,000 16,000 12,000 200 1
- Page 158 and 159:
Table 3. Major reasons for change i
- Page 160 and 161:
158
- Page 162 and 163:
4.1. Pink-footed goose Anser brachy
- Page 164 and 165:
Table 2. Major threats that drove P
- Page 166 and 167:
4.2. Barnacle goose Branta leucopsi
- Page 168 and 169:
Figure 2. Current breeding and wint
- Page 170 and 171:
Table 3. Conservation actions in pl
- Page 172 and 173:
4.3. Whooper swan Cygnus cygnus Sum
- Page 174 and 175:
Threat Description Impact Hunting a
- Page 176 and 177:
4.4. White-headed duck Oxyura leuco
- Page 178 and 179:
No. of individuals 5000 4500 4000 3
- Page 180 and 181:
educing the population in the count
- Page 182 and 183:
4.5. White stork Ciconia ciconia Su
- Page 184 and 185:
Country No. of breeding pairs Trend
- Page 186 and 187:
Action Description Impact Monitorin
- Page 188 and 189:
4.6. Eurasian spoonbill Platalea le
- Page 190 and 191:
Country No. of breeding pairs No. o
- Page 192 and 193:
Threat Description Impact Residenti
- Page 194 and 195:
4.7. Dalmatian pelican Pelecanus cr
- Page 196 and 197:
194
- Page 198 and 199:
Table 3 Major threats that drove th
- Page 200 and 201:
4.8. Lesser kestrel Falco naumanni
- Page 202 and 203:
Figure 2. Current distribution of L
- Page 204 and 205:
Action Description Impact Livelihoo
- Page 206 and 207:
4.9. Saker falcon Falco cherrug Sum
- Page 208 and 209:
Table 2. Latest Saker falcon popula
- Page 210 and 211:
Action Description Impact Planning
- Page 212 and 213:
4.10. Peregrine falcon Falco peregr
- Page 214 and 215:
No. of breeding pairs 1,600 1,200 8
- Page 216 and 217:
Action Description Impact Legislati
- Page 218 and 219:
4.11. Red kite Milvus milvus Summar
- Page 220 and 221:
Country No. of breeding pairs Trend
- Page 222 and 223:
Action Description Impact Monitorin
- Page 224 and 225:
4.12. White-tailed eagle Haliaeetus
- Page 226 and 227:
Country No. of breeding pairs Year
- Page 228 and 229:
References 1. Bijleveld, M. 1974 Bi
- Page 230 and 231:
4.13. Bearded vulture Gypaetus barb
- Page 232 and 233:
Figure 2. Current distribution of B
- Page 234 and 235:
4.14. Griffon vulture Gyps fulvus S
- Page 236 and 237:
Figure 2. Current distribution of G
- Page 238 and 239:
Action Description Impact Monitorin
- Page 240 and 241:
4.15. Cinereous vulture Aegypius mo
- Page 242 and 243:
Figure 2. Current distribution of C
- Page 244 and 245:
4.16. Spanish imperial eagle Aquila
- Page 246 and 247:
Threat Description Impact Transport
- Page 248 and 249:
Drivers of recovery The spectacular
- Page 250 and 251:
4.17. Eastern imperial eagle Aquila
- Page 252 and 253:
Figure 2. Current distribution of E
- Page 254 and 255:
252
- Page 256 and 257:
4.18. Common crane Grus grus Summar
- Page 258 and 259:
Figure 2. Current breeding and wint
- Page 260 and 261:
Action Monitoring and planning Site
- Page 262 and 263:
4.19. Roseate tern Sterna dougallii
- Page 264 and 265:
Threat Description Impact Human int
- Page 266 and 267:
264
- Page 268 and 269:
337,539 2,000 20,000 >163,750 % abu
- Page 270 and 271:
1950s 1980s Present 50km grid Speci
- Page 272 and 273:
No. of species 1 2 3 4 5 6 > 6 No.
- Page 274 and 275:
272
- Page 276 and 277:
A Range change B Range change C Ran
- Page 278 and 279:
Reason for positive change Species
- Page 280 and 281:
Dalmatian pelicans at the Kerkini L
- Page 282 and 283:
280
- Page 284 and 285:
The comeback of large and charismat
- Page 286 and 287:
A safari group in the Velebit mount
- Page 288 and 289:
The view from a bear watching hide
- Page 290 and 291:
species [44] [45] and if animals be
- Page 292 and 293:
One of the challenges around increa
- Page 294 and 295:
Box 1. Return and urbanization of w
- Page 296 and 297:
Table 1. Livestock damage by mammal
- Page 298 and 299:
key tool for wildlife population in
- Page 300 and 301:
Some of the over 500,000 visitors a
- Page 302 and 303:
Box 2. The native versus alien spec
- Page 304 and 305:
References 1. Navarro, L.M. and H.M
- Page 306 and 307:
113. Potena, G., et al., Brown Bear
- Page 308 and 309:
Appendix 1. Sources of distribution
- Page 310:
Acknowledgements This study on wild