130925-studie-wildlife-comeback-in-europe
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Table 2.<br />
Latest Saker falcon<br />
population estimates<br />
<strong>in</strong> Europe, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
those countries that<br />
hold at least 1% of the<br />
European population.<br />
Country No. of breed<strong>in</strong>g pairs Year %<br />
Austria 25–30 2010 [17] 4<br />
Bulgaria 0–8 2012 [18]<br />
Croatia 3–5 2010 [19] 1<br />
Czech Republic 20–25 2013 [20] 3<br />
Germany 0–1 2006 [9]<br />
[21]<br />
Hungary 241–245 2012 33<br />
FYRO Macedonia 0–3 2013 [22]<br />
Moldova 10–12 2010 [19] 2<br />
was on the br<strong>in</strong>k of ext<strong>in</strong>ction <strong>in</strong> the 1970s [35] . In<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e, which also holds 45% of the Saker falcon<br />
population <strong>in</strong> Europe, the population suffered<br />
significant decl<strong>in</strong>es s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1950/60s, but is now<br />
considered to be relatively stable [10, 28, 36] . In Bulgaria,<br />
Saker falcons used to be common and widespread<br />
before the 1930s [37] , but are now close to ext<strong>in</strong>ction<br />
(Table 2), and the last documented successful<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g attempt was <strong>in</strong> 1997 [38] .<br />
Table 3.<br />
Major threats that<br />
drove Saker falcon<br />
decl<strong>in</strong>e and may<br />
still constra<strong>in</strong> the<br />
population [9] .<br />
Threat Description Impact<br />
Agricultural<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensification<br />
Agricultural<br />
abandonment<br />
Wood and pulp<br />
plantations<br />
Conversion of grasslands <strong>in</strong>to arable land, or <strong>in</strong>to v<strong>in</strong>eyards<br />
<strong>in</strong> Bulgaria, leads to a reduction <strong>in</strong> prey availability.<br />
Disturbance at nest sites from agricultural operations.<br />
Poison<strong>in</strong>g by pesticides or other chemicals, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
low productivity.<br />
Tree fell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> steppe and pseudo-steppe may limit<br />
nest availability.<br />
Decrease <strong>in</strong> graz<strong>in</strong>g animal stock results <strong>in</strong> lower prey<br />
availability.<br />
Loss of forag<strong>in</strong>g habitat through afforestation of<br />
agricultural land.<br />
Disturbance at nest sites from forestry activities.<br />
High<br />
locally<br />
Medium<br />
Unknown<br />
Local<br />
High<br />
Local<br />
Other Nest collapse when old or weak nests are occupied. High<br />
Hunt<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
collect<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Persecution/<br />
control<br />
Un<strong>in</strong>tentional<br />
effects of hunt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and collect<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Transportation and<br />
service corridors<br />
Trapp<strong>in</strong>g for use <strong>in</strong> falconry, especially <strong>in</strong> the Middle<br />
East, Pakistan and North Africa.<br />
Nest robb<strong>in</strong>g was critical <strong>in</strong> the Czech Republic,<br />
Slovakia and possibly Bulgaria, Ukra<strong>in</strong>e and Russia.<br />
Illegal shoot<strong>in</strong>g, especially <strong>in</strong> the migratory Asian<br />
populations.<br />
Destruction of artificial nests where considered a<br />
threat by game keepers, particularly <strong>in</strong> the Czech<br />
Republic.<br />
Persecution by pigeon-fanciers (poison<strong>in</strong>g, shoot<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
destruction of nest) <strong>in</strong> Serbia, Hungary, Slovakia<br />
Suslik eradication – considered a pest or competitor<br />
with livestock.<br />
Un<strong>in</strong>tentional poison<strong>in</strong>g from bait <strong>in</strong>tended for foxes<br />
and other verm<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Electrocution by power l<strong>in</strong>es.<br />
Renewable energy Collisions with w<strong>in</strong>d turb<strong>in</strong>es. Low<br />
Residential and<br />
commercial<br />
development<br />
M<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and<br />
quarry<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Invasive nonnative/alien<br />
species<br />
Problematic native<br />
species<br />
Climate change and<br />
severe weather<br />
Poland 0–2 2007 [23]<br />
Romania 10 2010 [8] 1<br />
Serbia 25–35 2013 [24] 4<br />
Slovakia 40–45 2012 [25] 6<br />
[19]<br />
Ukra<strong>in</strong>e 315–345 2010 45<br />
W<strong>in</strong>d farm development has resulted <strong>in</strong> loss of<br />
breed<strong>in</strong>g and forag<strong>in</strong>g areas <strong>in</strong> east Austria, west<br />
Hungary, north Serbia, west and southeast Romania<br />
Infrastructure development results <strong>in</strong> loss of Suslik<br />
colonies.<br />
Quarry<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> some parts of the species’ range results<br />
<strong>in</strong> loss of nest-sites.<br />
Hybridisation with escaped hybrid falcons.<br />
Nest predation by natural predators.<br />
Extreme weather can cause nest collapse or death of<br />
eggs or small chicks.<br />
Low<br />
Potentially<br />
high<br />
Potentially<br />
high locally<br />
Medium<br />
Local<br />
Low<br />
Low<br />
High<br />
High<br />
Medium<br />
to locally<br />
high<br />
Medium<br />
Local<br />
Unknown<br />
Low<br />
Low<br />
Distribution:<br />
current status and changes<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the mid-1900s, Saker falcon distribution<br />
has become fragmented as a result of population<br />
decl<strong>in</strong>es and range contractions, especially <strong>in</strong><br />
southeast Europe [5, 9] , and the species became<br />
ext<strong>in</strong>ct from the European part of Russia <strong>in</strong> the early<br />
21 st century. In the late 20 th century, populations<br />
have undergone shifts with<strong>in</strong> their regional distribution,<br />
as a result of chang<strong>in</strong>g habitat occupancy [38] .<br />
In central Europe, follow<strong>in</strong>g the abandonment of<br />
graz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the foothills and mounta<strong>in</strong>s after 1990<br />
and the end of the communist regime, Saker falcon<br />
territories <strong>in</strong> mounta<strong>in</strong>s and hills were abandoned<br />
<strong>in</strong> favour of lowland agricultural areas, where the<br />
species cont<strong>in</strong>ues to expand, occupy<strong>in</strong>g new (but<br />
probably historically used) areas [8, 30] . Similarly, <strong>in</strong><br />
eastern Europe, Saker falcons decl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the forest<br />
steppe, but rema<strong>in</strong>ed and possibly <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong><br />
the southern steppe zone [28, 33, 38] . Most nest sites for<br />
the species <strong>in</strong> central and eastern Europe are now<br />
electricity pylons [38] and artificial nests are used<br />
extensively by Saker falcons <strong>in</strong> the Carpathian<br />
Bas<strong>in</strong> [8, 30, 35] .<br />
Major threats<br />
The Saker falcon suffered decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> central and<br />
eastern Europe <strong>in</strong> the 19 th and 20 th centuries [9, 38] .<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> reasons <strong>in</strong>clude persecution, and habitat<br />
loss and degradation, due to decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> key prey<br />
species, as a result of abandonment of pastoralism<br />
after the end of the communist regime,<br />
while ongo<strong>in</strong>g nest robb<strong>in</strong>g for falconry had<br />
important negative effects on already decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
populations [8, 9, 27, 38] . Agricultural <strong>in</strong>tensification<br />
has also had negative impacts on Saker falcons,<br />
result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> habitat loss for the species’ prey<br />
(Suslik) [8, 9, 30, 38] . However, it is important to note that<br />
<strong>in</strong>tensive agricultural areas currently hold some of<br />
the highest Saker falcon breed<strong>in</strong>g pair densities <strong>in</strong><br />
Hungary [8] , <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the species can utilise<br />
such habitats given adequate prey and (artificial)<br />
nest site availability.<br />
206