Action Description Impact Plann<strong>in</strong>g and monitor<strong>in</strong>g International Species Action Plan <strong>in</strong> place and national plans exist <strong>in</strong> some countries (Czech Republic, Hungary, and Serbia). Medium Site/area protection Site/area management Habitat and natural process restoration Systematic monitor<strong>in</strong>g carried out <strong>in</strong> a number of countries. There are 134 IBAs identified for Saker falcon, of which 53% are fully designated as SPAs or other protected areas and 13% are not protected. Power l<strong>in</strong>e mitigation. Nest protection. Prey population management (Suslik translocation). Medium Medium High Historically high Medium Species recovery Provision of artificial nests. High Ex-situ conservation Education and awareness Captive breed<strong>in</strong>g. Awareness rais<strong>in</strong>g campaigns towards gamekeepers. Low High Legislation Protected by law <strong>in</strong> all countries. Medium Table 4. Conservation actions <strong>in</strong> place for Saker falcon [9] . Habitat loss rema<strong>in</strong>s an important problem today [3, 9] and nest robb<strong>in</strong>g, which is no longer a significant problem <strong>in</strong> most of central Europe, may still be a considerable threat <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e and eastern Europe [40] . New threats have also come about, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g electrocution [3, 30] . It is likely that nest site availability limits Saker falcon populations [41] , as a result of removal of trees <strong>in</strong> agricultural areas [3, 9] . Illegal poison<strong>in</strong>g is another critical threat, as it appears that use of poison bait is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Carpathian Bas<strong>in</strong> [3, 4] . Drivers of recovery Conservation measures mostly <strong>in</strong>clude nest protection, provision of artificial nests, <strong>in</strong>sulat<strong>in</strong>g power l<strong>in</strong>es, habitat management (e.g. through agri-environment schemes), population management of key prey species, and education campaigns [27, 30, 33, 38, 42] . The Saker falcon has shown evidence of recovery <strong>in</strong> the Carpathian Bas<strong>in</strong>, as a direct result of active conservation effort [27, 30, 33, 42] . With effective protection of the species and appropriate management of its habitats, there is scope for further recovery and recolonisation <strong>in</strong> other parts of Europe [43] . 208
References 1. ARKive. 2008. Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug). Available from: http://www.arkive.org/ saker-falcon/falco-cherrug [accessed on 20 July 2013]. 2. Cramp, S. (ed.) 1980. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol 2. Hawks to Bustards. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3. Bagyura, J., Fidlóczky, J. & Prommer, M. 2010. Conservation of the Saker Falcon <strong>in</strong> the Carpathian Bas<strong>in</strong>. Budapest: MME/BirdLife Hungary. 4. BirdLife International. 2013. Species factsheet: Falco cherrug. Available from: http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/speciesfactsheet.php?id=3619 [accessed on 20 July 2013]. 5. Baumgart, W. 1991. Der Sakerfalke. Lutherstadt: A. Ziemsen Verlag. 6. Snow, D.W. & Perr<strong>in</strong>s, C.M. 1998. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol. 1: Non-Passer<strong>in</strong>es. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 7. Prommer, M., Bagyura, J., Chavko, J. & Uhr<strong>in</strong>, M. 2012. Migratory movements of the Central and Eastern European Saker Falcons (Falco cherrug) from juvenile dispersal to adulthood. Aquila 119: 111–134. 8. Prommer, M. 2013. <strong>in</strong> litt. 9. Nagy, S. & Demeter, I. 2006. Saker Falcon: European Action Plan. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. 10. Galush<strong>in</strong>, V.M. 2004. Status of the Saker <strong>in</strong> Russia and Eastern Europe. Falco 24: 3–8. 11. MME/BirdLife Hungary. Undated. Species Description. LIFE06 NAT/H/000096 Conservation of the Falco cherrug <strong>in</strong> the Carpathian Bas<strong>in</strong>. Available from: http://sakerlife. mme.hu/en/content/show?dattype=kerecsen [accessed on 20 July 2013]. 12. Southeastern European Saker Falcon Network. 2010. Saker Falcon. Available from: http://www.cherrug.org/sakerfalcon. htm [accessed on 20 July 2013]. 13. UNEP-WCMC Species Database. Cambridge: United Nations Environmental Program, World Conservation Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Centre. Available from: http://www.unep-wcmc-apps.org/isdb/Taxonomy/ [accessed on: 04 April 2013]. 14. IUCN. 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2. Available from: http://www.iucnredlist.org [accessed on 04 April 2013]. 15. BirdLife International. 2004. Birds <strong>in</strong> Europe: Population Estimates, Trends and Conservation Status. Cambridge: BirdLife International. 16. BirdLife International. 2004. Birds <strong>in</strong> the European Union: A Status Assessment. Wagen<strong>in</strong>gen: BirdLife International. 17. Gamauf, A. 2012. A prelim<strong>in</strong>ary overview of raptor monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Austria. Acrocephalus 33: 159−166. 18. Spasov, S. 2013. <strong>in</strong> litt. 19. Ragyov, D. 2010. Southeast European Saker Falcon network – scope and f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs. In Conservation of the Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug) <strong>in</strong> Europe – Shar<strong>in</strong>g the Results of the LIFE06 NAT/H/000096 “Conservation of the Falco cherrug <strong>in</strong> the Carpathian Bas<strong>in</strong>” Project. 16–18 September 2010. pp. 32–33. Eger, Hungary: Bükk National Park Directorate. 20. Landsfeld, B. 2013. Odhad počtu párů dravců a vybraných druhů sov v ČR. Zpravodaj SOVDS 13: 3. 21. Saker LIFE. 2012. Breed<strong>in</strong>g Results of Saker Falcons <strong>in</strong> Hungary <strong>in</strong> 2012. Available from: http://sakerlife2.mme.hu/en/content/ results [accessed on 20 July 2013]. 22. Velevski, M. 2013. <strong>in</strong> litt. 23. Sikora, A., Rohde, Z., Gromadzki, M., Neubauer, G. & Chylarecki, P. (eds) 2007. Atlas Rozmieszczenia Ptaków Lęgowych Polski 1985–2004. Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe. 24. Puzović, S. & Ružić, M. 2013. <strong>in</strong> litt. 25. Chavko, J. & Deutschova, L. 2013. <strong>in</strong> litt. 26. Tucker, G.M. & Heath, M.F. 1994. Birds <strong>in</strong> Europe: Their Conservation Status. Cambridge: BirdLife International. 27. Bagyura, J., Szitta, T., Haraszthy, L., Viszló , L., Fidlóczky, J. & Prommer, M. 2012. Results of the Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug) conservation programme <strong>in</strong> Hungary between 1980–2010. Aquila 119: 105–110. 28. Bondarenko, Y. 2013. <strong>in</strong> litt. 29. Iankov, P. & Grad<strong>in</strong>arov, D. 2012. Conservation strategy of the Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug) <strong>in</strong> Bulgaria. Aquila 2012: 31–45. 30. Bagyura, J., Szitta, T., Haraszthy, L., Demeter, I., Sándor, I., Dudás, M., Kállay, G. & Viszló , L. 2004. Population trend of the Saker Falcon Falco cherrug <strong>in</strong> Hungary between 1980 and 2002. In R.D. Chancellor & B.-U. Meyburg (eds). Raptors Worldwide: 663–672. Budapest: WWGBP/MME. 31. Milobog, Y.V. 2012. Falconiformes of the steppe zone of Ukra<strong>in</strong>e: species composition, territorial distribution, number dynamics and conservation. PhD Dissertation, Shmal’gauzen Institute of Zoology, Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian National Academy of Sciences. 32. Milobog, Y.V., Vetrov, V.V., Strigunov, V.I. & Belik, V.P. 2010. The Saker (Falco cherrug Gray) <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e and adjacent areas. Branta: Transactions of the Azov-Black Sea Ornithological Station 13: 135–159. 33. Chavko, J. 2010. Trend and conservation of Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug) population <strong>in</strong> western Slovakia between 1976 and 2010. Slovak Raptor Journal 4: 1–22. 34. Puzović, S., Tucakov, M. & Stojnić, N. 2010. Current status and conservation of Saker Falcon Falco cherrug <strong>in</strong> Serbia. Conservation of the Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug) <strong>in</strong> Europe – Shar<strong>in</strong>g the Results of the LIFE06 NAT/H/000096 “Conservation of the Falco cherrug <strong>in</strong> the Carpathian Bas<strong>in</strong>” Project. 16–18 September 2010: 23. Eger, Hungary: Bükk National Park Directorate. 35. CORO-SKAT. 2012. Rekordjahr für den Sakerfalken: 37 Jungvögel <strong>in</strong> Österreich – Höchstes Brutergebnis seit Mitte der 70er Jahre. Available at: http://www.birdlife.at/ coro-skat/presse/rekordjahr-fuer-den-sakerfalken.html [accessed on 20 July 2013]. 36. Milobog, Y. & Vetrov, V. 2010. Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug) <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e and adjacent areas. In Conservation of the Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug) <strong>in</strong> Europe – Shar<strong>in</strong>g the Results of the LIFE06 NAT/H/000096 “Conservation of the Falco cherrug <strong>in</strong> the Carpathian Bas<strong>in</strong>” Project. 16–18 September 2010. Eger, Hungary: Bükk National Park Directorate. 37. Ragyov, D. & Shishkova, V. 2006. Saker Falcon <strong>in</strong> Bulgaria: past present and future. Falco 27: 4–8. 38. Ragyov, D., Kmetova, E., Dixon, A., Franz, k., Koshev, Y. & Nedialkov, N. 2009. Saker Falcon Falco cherrug Re<strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>in</strong> Bulgaria – Feasibility Study. Sofia: Southeast Europe Saker Falcon Network. 39. Hagermeijer, W.J.M. & Blair, M.J. 1997. The EBCC Atlas of European Breed<strong>in</strong>g Birds: Their Distribution and Abundance. London: T. & A. D. Poyser. 40. Prommer, M., Milobog, Y., Gavrilyuk, M. & Vetrov, V. 2012. Conservation Plan for Saker Falcon (Falco cherrug) <strong>in</strong> Ukra<strong>in</strong>e – Draft Version. 41. Dixon, A. 2007. Saker Falcon breed<strong>in</strong>g population estimates. Part 1: Europe. Falco 29: 4–12. 42. Bagyura, J., Haraszthy, L. & Szitta, T. 1994. Methods and results of Saker Falcon Falco cherrug management and conservation <strong>in</strong> Hungary. In B.-U. Meyburg & R.D. Chancellor (eds). Raptor Conservation Today: 391–395. Budapest: WWGBP & Pica Press. 43. MME/BirdLife Hungary. Undated. LIFE. LIFE06 NAT/H/000096 Conservation of Falco cherrug <strong>in</strong> NE Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia. Available from: http://sakerlife2.mme.hu/en/content/ project-description [accessed on 20 July]. Peer reviewers • Jozef Chavko • Lucia Deutschova • Mátyás Prommer 209
- Page 1 and 2:
Stefanie Deinet Christina Ieronymid
- Page 3 and 4:
Wildlife comeback in Europe The rec
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of contents Foreword . . . .
- Page 7:
Foreword Shifting baselines In Euro
- Page 10 and 11:
The Adriatic coastline of the Veleb
- Page 12 and 13:
96 year old olive farmer with his d
- Page 14 and 15:
12
- Page 16 and 17:
Limitations of population trend dat
- Page 18 and 19:
Constructing historical distributio
- Page 20 and 21:
Red deer at the Oostvaardersplassen
- Page 22 and 23:
Table 2. Definitions of classificat
- Page 24 and 25:
22
- Page 26 and 27:
3.1. European bison Bison bonasus S
- Page 28 and 29:
Table 2. Latest population estimate
- Page 30 and 31:
Figure 1c. Map highlighting areas o
- Page 32 and 33:
Rank Reason for change Description
- Page 34 and 35:
3.2. Alpine ibex Capra ibex Summary
- Page 36 and 37:
Figure 1a. Distribution of Alpine i
- Page 38 and 39:
% change 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Fig
- Page 40 and 41:
3.3. Iberian ibex Capra pyrenaica S
- Page 42 and 43:
Figure 1a. Distribution of Iberian
- Page 44 and 45:
Rank Reason for change Description
- Page 46 and 47:
3.4. Southern chamois Rupicapra pyr
- Page 48 and 49:
Figure 1a. Distribution of Southern
- Page 50 and 51:
Rank Reason for change Description
- Page 52 and 53:
3.5. Northern chamois Rupicapra rup
- Page 54 and 55:
Scale Status Population trend Justi
- Page 56 and 57:
% change 80 60 40 20 0 and Italy [2
- Page 58 and 59:
Subspecies balcanica Exploitation B
- Page 60 and 61:
3.6. Eurasian elk Alces alces Summa
- Page 62 and 63:
Figure 1a. Distribution of Eurasian
- Page 64 and 65:
Poland [10] and Estonia [28] . It i
- Page 66 and 67:
References 1. Geist, V. 1998. Deer
- Page 68 and 69:
3.7. Roe deer Capreolus capreolus S
- Page 70 and 71:
Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 72 and 73:
Figure 2. Change in Roe deer popula
- Page 74 and 75:
Recent developments As discussed ab
- Page 76 and 77:
3.8. Red deer Cervus elaphus Summar
- Page 78 and 79:
Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 80 and 81:
% change 750 600 450 300 150 0 Figu
- Page 82 and 83:
lineages for the local area and min
- Page 84 and 85:
3.9. Wild boar Sus scrofa Summary T
- Page 86 and 87:
Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 88 and 89:
Abundance and distribution: changes
- Page 90 and 91:
References 1. IUCN 2011a. The IUCN
- Page 92 and 93:
3.10. Golden jackal Canis aureus Su
- Page 94 and 95:
Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 96 and 97:
Recent developments Table 3. Major
- Page 98 and 99:
3.11. Grey wolf Canis lupus Summary
- Page 100 and 101:
Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 102 and 103:
Drivers of recovery Figure 2. Distr
- Page 104 and 105:
References 1. Mech, L.D. & Boitani,
- Page 106 and 107:
3.12. Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx Summa
- Page 108 and 109:
Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 110 and 111:
% change 750 600 450 300 150 0 Figu
- Page 112 and 113:
Figure 3. Map of recent development
- Page 114 and 115:
3.13. Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus Su
- Page 116 and 117:
Figure 1a. Distribution of the Iber
- Page 118 and 119:
Table 3. Major reasons for positive
- Page 120 and 121:
18. IUCN 2011b. European Red List.
- Page 122 and 123:
3.14. Wolverine Gulo gulo Summary T
- Page 124 and 125:
Figure 1a. Distribution of Wolverin
- Page 126 and 127:
Rank Reason for change Description
- Page 128 and 129:
3.15. Grey seal Halichoerus grypus
- Page 130 and 131:
Estimate assessed Reference Global
- Page 132 and 133:
% change 1500 1200 900 600 300 0 Fi
- Page 134 and 135:
3.16. Harbour seal Phoca vitulina S
- Page 136 and 137:
east coast, the distribution is res
- Page 138 and 139:
% change 200 150 100 50 0 populatio
- Page 140 and 141:
Figure 3. Map of recent development
- Page 142 and 143:
3.17. Brown bear Ursus arctos Summa
- Page 144 and 145:
Table 2. Latest population estimate
- Page 146 and 147:
144
- Page 148 and 149:
Recent developments % change 200 15
- Page 150 and 151:
mation, e.g. between Slovenia and C
- Page 152 and 153:
3.18. Eurasian beaver Castor fiber
- Page 154 and 155:
Estimate Year assessed Reference Gl
- Page 156 and 157:
% change 20,000 16,000 12,000 200 1
- Page 158 and 159:
Table 3. Major reasons for change i
- Page 160 and 161: 158
- Page 162 and 163: 4.1. Pink-footed goose Anser brachy
- Page 164 and 165: Table 2. Major threats that drove P
- Page 166 and 167: 4.2. Barnacle goose Branta leucopsi
- Page 168 and 169: Figure 2. Current breeding and wint
- Page 170 and 171: Table 3. Conservation actions in pl
- Page 172 and 173: 4.3. Whooper swan Cygnus cygnus Sum
- Page 174 and 175: Threat Description Impact Hunting a
- Page 176 and 177: 4.4. White-headed duck Oxyura leuco
- Page 178 and 179: No. of individuals 5000 4500 4000 3
- Page 180 and 181: educing the population in the count
- Page 182 and 183: 4.5. White stork Ciconia ciconia Su
- Page 184 and 185: Country No. of breeding pairs Trend
- Page 186 and 187: Action Description Impact Monitorin
- Page 188 and 189: 4.6. Eurasian spoonbill Platalea le
- Page 190 and 191: Country No. of breeding pairs No. o
- Page 192 and 193: Threat Description Impact Residenti
- Page 194 and 195: 4.7. Dalmatian pelican Pelecanus cr
- Page 196 and 197: 194
- Page 198 and 199: Table 3 Major threats that drove th
- Page 200 and 201: 4.8. Lesser kestrel Falco naumanni
- Page 202 and 203: Figure 2. Current distribution of L
- Page 204 and 205: Action Description Impact Livelihoo
- Page 206 and 207: 4.9. Saker falcon Falco cherrug Sum
- Page 208 and 209: Table 2. Latest Saker falcon popula
- Page 212 and 213: 4.10. Peregrine falcon Falco peregr
- Page 214 and 215: No. of breeding pairs 1,600 1,200 8
- Page 216 and 217: Action Description Impact Legislati
- Page 218 and 219: 4.11. Red kite Milvus milvus Summar
- Page 220 and 221: Country No. of breeding pairs Trend
- Page 222 and 223: Action Description Impact Monitorin
- Page 224 and 225: 4.12. White-tailed eagle Haliaeetus
- Page 226 and 227: Country No. of breeding pairs Year
- Page 228 and 229: References 1. Bijleveld, M. 1974 Bi
- Page 230 and 231: 4.13. Bearded vulture Gypaetus barb
- Page 232 and 233: Figure 2. Current distribution of B
- Page 234 and 235: 4.14. Griffon vulture Gyps fulvus S
- Page 236 and 237: Figure 2. Current distribution of G
- Page 238 and 239: Action Description Impact Monitorin
- Page 240 and 241: 4.15. Cinereous vulture Aegypius mo
- Page 242 and 243: Figure 2. Current distribution of C
- Page 244 and 245: 4.16. Spanish imperial eagle Aquila
- Page 246 and 247: Threat Description Impact Transport
- Page 248 and 249: Drivers of recovery The spectacular
- Page 250 and 251: 4.17. Eastern imperial eagle Aquila
- Page 252 and 253: Figure 2. Current distribution of E
- Page 254 and 255: 252
- Page 256 and 257: 4.18. Common crane Grus grus Summar
- Page 258 and 259: Figure 2. Current breeding and wint
- Page 260 and 261:
Action Monitoring and planning Site
- Page 262 and 263:
4.19. Roseate tern Sterna dougallii
- Page 264 and 265:
Threat Description Impact Human int
- Page 266 and 267:
264
- Page 268 and 269:
337,539 2,000 20,000 >163,750 % abu
- Page 270 and 271:
1950s 1980s Present 50km grid Speci
- Page 272 and 273:
No. of species 1 2 3 4 5 6 > 6 No.
- Page 274 and 275:
272
- Page 276 and 277:
A Range change B Range change C Ran
- Page 278 and 279:
Reason for positive change Species
- Page 280 and 281:
Dalmatian pelicans at the Kerkini L
- Page 282 and 283:
280
- Page 284 and 285:
The comeback of large and charismat
- Page 286 and 287:
A safari group in the Velebit mount
- Page 288 and 289:
The view from a bear watching hide
- Page 290 and 291:
species [44] [45] and if animals be
- Page 292 and 293:
One of the challenges around increa
- Page 294 and 295:
Box 1. Return and urbanization of w
- Page 296 and 297:
Table 1. Livestock damage by mammal
- Page 298 and 299:
key tool for wildlife population in
- Page 300 and 301:
Some of the over 500,000 visitors a
- Page 302 and 303:
Box 2. The native versus alien spec
- Page 304 and 305:
References 1. Navarro, L.M. and H.M
- Page 306 and 307:
113. Potena, G., et al., Brown Bear
- Page 308 and 309:
Appendix 1. Sources of distribution
- Page 310:
Acknowledgements This study on wild