130925-studie-wildlife-comeback-in-europe

References
1. Navarro, L.M. and H.M. Pereira, Rewilding
Abandoned Landscapes in Europe.
Ecosystems, 2012. 15(6): p. 900–912.
2. Fischer, A., et al., Universal criteria for
species conservation priorities? Findings
from a survey of public views across Europe.
Biological Conservation, 2011. 144(3): p.
998–1007.
3. Estes, J.A., et al., Trophic Downgrading of
Planet Earth. Science, 2011. 333(6040): p.
301–306.
4. Ripple, W.J., et al., Trophic cascades from
wolves to grizzly bears in Yellowstone. Journal
of Animal Ecology, 2013: p. n/a-n/a.
5. Johnson, C.N., Red in tooth and claw: how
top predators shape terrestrial ecosystems.
Journal of Animal Ecology, 2010. 79(4): p.
723–725.
6. Kuijper, D.P.J., Lack of natural control mechanisms
increases wildlife–forestry conflict in
managed temperate European forest systems.
European Journal of Forest Research, 2011.
130: p. 895–909.
7. Fuller, R.J. and R.M.A. Gill, Ecological impacts
of increasing numbers of deer in British
woodland. Forestry, 2001. 74(3): p. 193–199.
8. Miller, G.R., R.P. Cummins, and A.J. Hester,
Red Deer and Woodland Regeneration in the
Cairngorms. Scottish Forestry, 1998. 52(1): p.
14–20.
9. Manning, A.D., I.J. Gordon, and W.J. Ripple,
Restoring landscapes of fear with wolves in the
Scottish Highlands. Biological Conservation,
2009. 142(10): p. 2314–2321.
10. Czech, A. and S. Lisle, Understanding and
solving the beaver (Castor fiber L.)-human-conflict:
An opportunity to improve the
environment and economy of Poland. Denisia,
2003. 9: p. 91–98.
11. VanWieren, S.E., The potential role of large
herbivores in nature conservation and
extensive land use in Europe. Biological
Journal of the Linnean Society, 1995. 56: p.
11–23.
12. Bruinderink, G.G., et al., Designing a coherent
ecological network for large mammals in
northwestern Europe. Conservation Biology,
2003. 17(2): p. 549–557.
13. Wood, B., Room for nature? Conservation
management of the Isle of Rum, UK and
prospects for large protected areas in Europe.
Biological Conservation, 2000. 94(1): p.
93–105.
14. Steven, R., J.G. Castley, and R. Buckley, Tourism
Revenue as a Conservation Tool for Threatened
Birds in Protected Areas. PLoS ONE, 2013. 8(5):
p. e62598.
15. UNEP/CMS Secretariat, Wildlife Watching and
Tourism, 2006: Bonn, Germany. pp.68.
16. O’Connor, S., et al., Whale Watching
Worldwide: tourism numbers, expenditures
and expanding economic benefits – special
report from the International Fund for Animal
Welfare, 2009, Prepared by Economists at
Large: Yarmouth MA, USA.
17. Christ, C., et al., Tourism and Biodiversity:
Mapping Tourism’s Global Footprint, 2003,
Conservation International / United Nations
Environment Programme. pp. 66.
18. United Nations Environment Programme
/ World Tourism Organisation, Tourism –
Investing in energy and resource efficiency,
2011.
19. NASCO, Namibia’s communal conservancies:
a review of progress and challenges in 2011,
2013, NASCO, Windhoek.
20. Tamar-ICMBio (2013). “Projeto TAMAR.”
Retrieved 28/08/2013, from http://www.
tamar.org.br/interna_ing.php?cod=63.
21. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, 2011 National
Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated
Recreation: National Overview, 2012. pp
24.
22. BIO Intelligence Service, Estimating the
economic value of the benefits provided by
the tourism/recreation and employment
supported by Natura 2000 – final report
prepared for the European Commission – DG
Environment, 2011.
23. Natural England, Monitor of Engagement with
the Natural Environment: The national survey
on people and the natural environment, in
Annual Report from the 2011–12 survey, 2012,
Natural England Commissioned Report
24. International Centre for Tourism and Hospitality
Research, The Economic Impact of
Wildlife Tourism in Scotland, in Scottish
Government Social Research, 2010, Bournemouth
University.
25. Bryden, D.M., et al., Assessing the economic
impacts of nature based tourism in Scotland,
in Commissioned Report No. 398, 2010,
Scottish Natural Heritage.
26. International Gorilla Conservation
Programme (2012). “Rwanda increases the
price of a mountain gorilla permit.” from
http://www.igcp.org/rwanda-increases-theprice-of-a-mountain-gorilla-permit/.
27. Kalpers, J., et al., Gorillas in the crossfire:
population dynamics of the Virunga
mountain gorillas over the past three decades.
Oryx, 2003. 37(03): p. 326–337.
28. Adams, W.M. and M. Infield, Who is on the
Gorilla’s Payroll? Claims on Tourist Revenue
From a Ugandan National Park. World Development,
2003. 31(1): p. 177–190.
29. Enserink, M. and G. Vogel, The Carnivore
Comeback. Science, 2006. 314: p. 746–749.
30. Naves, J., A. Fernández-Gil, and M. Delibes,
Effects of Recreation Activities on a Brown
Bear Family Group in Spain. Ursus, 2001. 12: p.
135–139.
31. Visit Finland, Wildlife Watching and
Photography as a Tourism Product – Intial
Assessment 2008, 2008.
32. Rautiainen, L., Preliminary estimates for a
report on the assessment of wildlife watching
in Finland, J. Keränen, Editor 2013, Wild Taiga.
33. Orabi, P., Argumentaire et Plan d’Actions pour
la Conservation du Vautour Fauvre en France,
2011, Ligue pour la Protection des Oiseaux.
pp. 34.
34. Dickie, I., J. Hughes, and A. Esteban, Watched
Like Never Before...the local economic benefits
of spectacular bird species 2006, RSPB. pp. 64.
35. RSPB, Natural Foundations – Conservation
and local employment in the UK, 2011.
36. Orams, M.B., Tourists getting close to whales,
is it what whale-watching is all about? Tourism
Management, 2000. 21(6): p. 561–569.
37. Garrod, B. and D.A. Fennell, An Analysis of
Whalewatching Codes of Conduct. Annals of
Tourism Research, 2004. 31(2): p. 334–352.
38. International Gorilla Conservation
Programme (2013). “Tourism in the ream of
the mountain gorilla.” Retrieved 30/08/2013,
from http://www.igcp.org/gorillas/tourism/.
39. Sandbrook, C. and S. Semple, The rules and
the reality of mountain gorilla Gorilla beringei
beringei tracking: how close do tourists get?
Oryx, 2006. 40(04): p. 428–433.
40. Weaver, C., et al. The catalytic role and
contributions of sustainable wildlife use to
the Namibia CBNRM Programme. in The
relevance of CBNRM to the conservation
and sustainable use of CITES-listed species in
exporting countries. 2011. Vienna, Austria:
Gland, Switzerland: IUCN and London, UK:
IIED.
41. European Anglers Alliance (2007).
“European Angling Tourism.” Retrieved
28/08/2013, from http://www.eaa-europe.eu/
fileadmin/templates/eaa/docs/EFTTA_JK_
Sweden_16March2007.pdf.
42. Kenward, R. and S. Sharp, Use Nationally of
Wildlife Resources across Europe (UNWIRE),
in GEMCONBIO: Governance and Ecosystem
Management for Conservation of Biodiversity,
B. Manos and J. Papathanasiou, Editors. 2008,
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
117–123.
43. Willebrand, T., Promoting hunting tourism
in north Sweden: opinions of local hunters.
European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2009.
55(3): p. 209–216.
44. Ciuti, S., et al., Effects of Humans on Behaviour
of Wildlife Exceed Those of Natural Predators
in a Landscape of Fear. PLoS ONE, 2012. 7(11): p.
e50611.
45. Benhaiem, S., et al., Hunting increases
vigilance levels in roe deer and modifies
feeding site selection. Animal Behaviour,
2008. 76(3): p. 611–618.
46. Treves, A. and S.M. Jones, Strategic tradeoffs
for wildlife-friendly eco-labels. Frontiers in
Ecology and the Environment, 2009. 8(9): p.
491–498.
47. Huber, D., et al., A multidimensional approach
to managing the European brown bear in
Croatia. Ursus, 2008. 19(1): p. 22–32.
48. Birdlife International, Wellbeing through
Wildlife in the EU, 2007: RSPB, UK. pp. 24.
49. de Groot, R. and P.S. Ramakrishnan, Cultural
and Amenity Services, in Ecosystems and
human well-being : current state and trends
: findings of the Condition and Trends
Working Group, R. Hassan, R. Scholes, and
N. Ash, Editors. 2005, Millenium Ecosystem
Assessment.
50. The National Trust (2013). “The National Trust
– What we protect.” Retrieved 28/08/2013,
from http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/
what-we-do/what-we-protect/.
51. United Nations Educational Scientific and
Cultural Organization (1972). “Convention
Concerning the Protection of the World
Cultural and Natural Heritage.” 28/08/2013,
from http://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/.
52. Council of Europe (2000). “The European
Landscape Convention.” Retrieved
28/08/2013, from http://www.coe.int/t/
dg4/cultureheritage/heritage/Landscape/
presentation_en.asp.
53. Wallner, A. The Role of Fox, Lynx and Wolf in
Mythology. in The Human Dimension in Large
Carnivore Conservation. 1998. Landshut,
Switzerland: KORA Bericht.
54. Bessee, D., The Canis-lupus duality: A narrative
history of the wolf. Journal of the European
Teacher Education Network, 2013. 8: p. 2–8.
55. Donald, P.F., et al., International Conservation
Policy Delivers Benefits for Birds in Europe.
Science, 2007. 317: p. 810–813.
56. Convention on Biological Diversity (2013).
“Strategic Plan 2011 – 2020: Aichi Biodviersity
Targets.” Retrieved 28/08/2013, from http://
www.cbd.int/sp/targets/.
57. Biodiversity Information System for Europe
(2013). “EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2020: EU
Targets and actions.” Retrieved 28/08/2013,
302