130925-studie-wildlife-comeback-in-europe

lineages for the local area and minimise interbreeding
where possible. Further restocking from
farms must be avoided even if the correct lineages
are present, as the artificial selection process may
have important effects on the species that cannot
be easily detected in many genetic analyses [31, 67] .
In addition, management should be designed in
such a way that it maintains the natural composition
and behaviour of populations (e.g. sex and
age structure, food habits) and does not alter the
transmission and conservation of genetic features,
which in turn allows for the preservation of a
natural selection process [31, 67] . Furthermore, some
management practices, such as maintenance of
high population density and local aggregation
of animals around watering holes or feeding
stations, and the resulting contact between species
increases the prevalence and transmission of
tuberculosis [68] . However, the Wild boar Sus scrofa
is considered the main reservoir of tuberculosis
in Spain and is thus much more relevant for transmission
to livestock than Red deer [69] .
References
1. Burbaitė, L. & Csányi, S. 2010. Red deer
population and harvest changes in Europe.
Acta Zoologica Lituanica, 20 (4): 179–188.
2. Mitchell-Jones, A.J., Amori, G., Bogdanowicz,
W., et al. 1999. The Atlas of European
Mammals, London, UK: T. and A.D. Poyser.
3. Gill R.M.A. 1990 Monitoring the status of
European and North American Cervids.
GEMS Information Series 8. Global
Environment Monitoring System, United
Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi,
Kenya 277p
4. Wilson, D.E. & Reeder, D.M. 2005. Mammal
Species of the World. A Taxonomic and
Geographic Reference. Third Edition,
Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University
Press.
5. Linnell, J.D.C. & Zachos, F.E. 2011. Status
and distribution patterns of European
ungulates: genetics, population history and
conservation, in Ungulate Management in
Europe: Problems and Practices, R. Putman,
M. Apollonio, and R. Andersen, Editors.,
Cambridge University Press: Cambridge,
UK.
6. Macdonald, D.W. & Barrett, P. 1993.
Mammals of Britain and Europe, London:
Collins.
7. Zachos, F.E. & Hartl, G.B. 2011. Phylogeography,
population genetics and conservation
of the European red deer Cervus
elaphus. Mammal Review, 41 (2): 138–150.
8. Sommer, R.S., Zachos, F.E., Street, M., et
al. 2008. Late Quaternary distribution
dynamics and phylogeography of the
red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Europe.
Quarternary Science Reviews, 27 (7–8):
714–733.
9. Apollonio, M., Andersen, R. & Putman, R.,
eds. 2010. European ungulates and their
management in the 21st century. Cambridge
University Press: Cambridge, UK.
10. Ward, A.I. 2005. Expanding ranges of wild
and feral deer in Great Britain. Mammal
Review, 35 (2): 165–173.
11. Maillard, D., Gaillard, J.-M., Hewison, A.J.M.,
et al. 2010. Ungulates and their management
in France, in European ungulates and
their management in the 21st century, M.
Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman,
Editors., Cambridge University Press:
Cambridge.
12. Andersen, R., Lund, E., Solberg, E.J., et al.
2010. Ungulates and their management
in Norway, in European ungulates and
their management in the 21st century, M.
Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman,
Editors., Cambridge University Press:
Cambridge.
13. Liberg, O., Bergström, R., Kindberg, J., et
al. 2010. Ungulates and their management
in Sweden, in European ungulates and
their management in the 21st century, M.
Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman,
Editors., Cambridge University Press:
Cambridge.
14. Bartoš, L., Kotrba, R. & Pintíř, J. 2010.
Ungulates and their management in the
Czech Republic, in European ungulates and
their management in the 21st century, M.
Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman,
Editors., Cambridge University Press:
Cambridge.
15. Andersone-Lilley, Ž., Balčiauskas, L.,
Ozoliņš, J., et al. 2010. Ungulates and their
management in the Baltics (Estonia, Latvia
and Lithuania), in European ungulates and
their management in the 21st century, M.
Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman,
Editors., Cambridge University Press:
Cambridge.
16. Imesch-Bebié, N., Gander, H. & Schnidrig-Petrig,
R. 2010. Ungulates and their
management in Switzerland, in European
ungulates and their management in the 21st
century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R.
Putman, Editors., Cambridge University
Press: Cambridge.
17. Adamic, M. & Jerina, K. 2010. Ungulates and
their management in Slovenia, in European
ungulates and their management in the 21st
century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R.
Putman, Editors., Cambridge University
Press: Cambridge, UK. 507–526.
18. Stojanov, A., Melovski, D., Ivanov, G., et al.
2010. Ungulates and their management
in Macedonia, in European ungulates and
their management in the 21st century, M.
Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman,
Editors., Cambridge University Press:
Cambridge, UK. 572–577.
19. Vingada, J., Fonseca, C., Cancela, J., et al.
2010. Ungulates and their management
in Portugal, in European ungulates and
their management in the 21st century, M.
Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman,
Editors., Cambridge University Press:
Cambridge, UK. 392–418.
20. Apollonio, M., Ciuti, S., Pedrotti, L., et al.
2010. Ungulates and their management
in Italy, in European ungulates and their
management in the 21st century, M.
Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R. Putman,
Editors., Cambridge University Press:
Cambridge.
21. Findo, S. & Skuban, M. 2010. Ungulates and
their management in Slovakia, in European
ungulates and their management in the 21st
century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R.
Putman, Editors., Cambridge University
Press: Cambridge.
22. Wawrzyniak, P., Jędrzejewski, W., Jędrzejewska,
B., et al. 2010. Ungulates and their
management in Poland, in European
ungulates and their management in the 21st
century, M. Apollonio, R. Andersen, and R.
Putman, Editors., Cambridge University
Press: Cambridge.
23. Kusak, J. & Krapinec, K. 2010. Ungulates and
their management in Croatia, in European
80