11.07.2016 Views

130925-studie-wildlife-comeback-in-europe

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 1a.<br />

Distribution of<br />

Eurasian beaver <strong>in</strong><br />

1955 [19] and 2013 [1] .<br />

Please note that<br />

Russia has not been<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded due to lack<br />

of reliable data.<br />

Range <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

for 1955 is extremely<br />

simplified, lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to apparent decl<strong>in</strong>es<br />

when compared to<br />

the more detailed<br />

2013 map [1] .<br />

Figure 1b.<br />

Map highlight<strong>in</strong>g<br />

areas of range<br />

expansion,<br />

persistence and<br />

contraction of the<br />

Eurasian beaver <strong>in</strong><br />

Europe between 1955<br />

and 2008. Please note<br />

that Russia has not<br />

been <strong>in</strong>cluded due to<br />

lack of reliable data.<br />

Range <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

for 1955 is extremely<br />

simplified, lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to apparent decl<strong>in</strong>es<br />

when compared to<br />

the more detailed<br />

2013 map, for<br />

example <strong>in</strong> the<br />

south of France,<br />

eastern Germany,<br />

Norway, Sweden and<br />

Ukra<strong>in</strong>e [1] .<br />

The large-scale expansion <strong>in</strong> range between<br />

1955 and the present day is reflected <strong>in</strong> the<br />

change <strong>in</strong> population size over the same period.<br />

The beaver <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> abundance by just over<br />

14,000%, with a doubl<strong>in</strong>g or tripl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> population<br />

size occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> all decades (Figure 2). The largest<br />

occurred <strong>in</strong> the 1970s, when the population multiplied<br />

by two, and the 1980s, when the <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

was 150% (Figure 1a). This represents a remarkable<br />

recovery <strong>in</strong> numbers over a mere 45-year period,<br />

which can be attributed to conservation successes<br />

<strong>in</strong> the underly<strong>in</strong>g populations <strong>in</strong> the data set. The<br />

trend presented is based on 23 populations from<br />

the species’ current range, cover<strong>in</strong>g a m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

of 96,000 <strong>in</strong>dividuals or 23% of the European<br />

population. Data were from 46% of the species’<br />

countries of occurrence <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Lithuania<br />

and Sweden (two of the major populations), but<br />

the data set was miss<strong>in</strong>g vital <strong>in</strong>formation from<br />

Latvia and Norway (Table 2).<br />

153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!