11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transportation’s <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

• GHG Reduction Effectiveness – Low = < 0.5% of transportation GHG emissions <strong>in</strong><br />

2030 (12 mmt CO2e; Moderate = 0.5 to 2.5% (12 to 60 mmt CO2e); High = > 2.5% (60<br />

mmt CO2e).<br />

• Costs (net <strong>in</strong>cluded cost per tonne) – Cost-effectiveness measured as net <strong>in</strong>cluded cost<br />

per tonne of CO2e reduced. A positive number represents <strong>in</strong>creased costs, while a<br />

negative number represents a net sav<strong>in</strong>gs. High Cost = > $200 per tonne CO2e<br />

reduced; Moderate Cost = $20 to $200 CO2e reduced; Low Cost = < $20/tonne CO2e<br />

reduced; Net Sav<strong>in</strong>gs = < $0/tonne CO2e reduced. 3<br />

“Net <strong>in</strong>cluded cost” <strong>in</strong>cludes both<br />

fuel production and distribution costs and vehicle costs, and is calculated as the cost<br />

<strong>in</strong>crement relative to the cost of conventional fuels and vehicles (gasol<strong>in</strong>e for light-duty<br />

vehicles, diesel for heavy-duty vehicles), net of taxes. See Appendix A for details on<br />

the calculation of costs.<br />

• Cobenefits – Plus (+) = significant positive cobenefits; M<strong>in</strong>us (-) = significant negative<br />

cobenefits; Plus/m<strong>in</strong>us (+/-) = both significant positive and negative cobenefits; Zero<br />

(0) = modest or negligible cobenefits. Cobenefits may <strong>in</strong>clude air pollutant emission<br />

reductions, consumer benefits, or other factors. The cobenefits rat<strong>in</strong>g does not <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

gasol<strong>in</strong>e sav<strong>in</strong>gs or related national security benefits, s<strong>in</strong>ce all strategies analyzed <strong>in</strong><br />

this report will reduce gasol<strong>in</strong>e consumption.<br />

Cost-effectiveness <strong>in</strong>cludes direct implementation costs as well as costs or sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

associated with fuel use changes <strong>in</strong>curred by vehicle owners/operators.<br />

2-17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!