11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Transportation's</strong> <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 1<br />

3-30<br />

would decl<strong>in</strong>e by 8 percent, or about $3.1 billion compared to FY 2007 receipts. 114<br />

Strategies focused on heavy-duty vehicles would have a somewhat greater<br />

impact than those focused on light-duty vehicles because of the higher tax rate<br />

on diesel fuel. A shift from gasol<strong>in</strong>e to diesel light-duty vehicles would have a<br />

smaller revenue impact; while less total fuel is consumed, the tax rate on diesel<br />

fuel is higher.<br />

The revenue effects of alternative fuels will depend upon taxation policy. S<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

2006, Federal policy has been to tax alternative fuels on an energy-equivalent<br />

basis to gasol<strong>in</strong>e. 115 This means that policies focused solely on <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the use<br />

of lower-carbon fuels should not have a significant revenue impact on the<br />

Highway Trust Fund. On the other hand, current tax policies may have<br />

implications for general fund revenue; for example, ethanol receives a substantial<br />

tax credit which reduces general fund revenues, but a tariff is levied on imported<br />

ethanol which could potentially generate revenue. The long-term f<strong>in</strong>ance<br />

implications of a shift to hydrogen or electricity will depend on tax policy for<br />

these fuels; current Federal policy does not tax these fuels for transportation<br />

purposes, and therefore any shift to these fuels would result <strong>in</strong> lost revenues to<br />

the Highway Trust Fund under the current f<strong>in</strong>ance structure.<br />

Pric<strong>in</strong>g measures, such as a cap and trade system, carbon tax, VMT fee, or<br />

congestion pric<strong>in</strong>g, would provide a new or alternative revenue source, which<br />

could potentially be directed to transportation <strong>in</strong>frastructure f<strong>in</strong>ance. (The<br />

revenue impacts of a cap and trade system would depend upon the extent to<br />

which allowances are auctioned vs. given away.) While transportation-specific<br />

pric<strong>in</strong>g revenues are likely to be redirected towards transportation system<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestment, it is less certa<strong>in</strong> that a portion of revenues from economy-wide<br />

measures such as cap and trade allowances or carbon taxes would be redirected<br />

towards transportation. F<strong>in</strong>ally, pric<strong>in</strong>g measures that reduce the wear and tear<br />

on exist<strong>in</strong>g road networks could also have fiscal implications to the extent they<br />

lower the total cost of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g or improv<strong>in</strong>g system performance even if<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestments <strong>in</strong> alternatives to carbon-<strong>in</strong>tensive travel are <strong>in</strong>creased.<br />

114 <strong>Gas</strong>ol<strong>in</strong>e tax receipts accounted for about $25.5 billion of trust fund revenue <strong>in</strong> FY<br />

2007, or about two-thirds of total receipts, so 20 percent * 60 percent * 2/3 = an 8<br />

percent reduction or $3.1 billion. This calculation assumes that trust fund revenues<br />

rema<strong>in</strong> constant through 2030, which is consistent with AEO Reference case<br />

projections of relatively constant fuel consumption (with <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> VMT offsett<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> fuel efficiency).<br />

115 Ethanol users actually pay slightly more per gallon of gasol<strong>in</strong>e equivalent even though<br />

ethanol is taxed less on a volumetric basis (Vol. 2 Sec. 2.2).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!