11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transportation’s <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>ated the 12 percent excise tax on idle reduction devices for new trucks as a f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

<strong>in</strong>centive to retrofit trucks with such devices.<br />

A uniform national anti-idl<strong>in</strong>g law would help to unify the exist<strong>in</strong>g patchwork of State<br />

laws and encourage more widespread adoption of idle reduction technology. 26 It is<br />

currently a State-by-State decision to exempt APUs from a truck’s total weight; a national<br />

standard could potentially help promote the technology by elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g the current<br />

patchwork of regulations. In addition, EPA has issued State implementation plan<br />

guidance to encourage States to <strong>in</strong>corporate truck idle reduction projects <strong>in</strong>to their air<br />

quality plann<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Adoption of idle reduction technology is likely to be faster among large fleet operators<br />

than among small fleet operators and <strong>in</strong>dependent truckers who are less able to afford the<br />

capital <strong>in</strong>vestment required for such equipment. In 2002, 55 percent of heavy trucks with<br />

sleeper cabs were privately owned (used for <strong>in</strong>ternal company bus<strong>in</strong>ess), 27 percent were<br />

motor carrier owned, and 11 percent were owned as <strong>in</strong>dependent truckers<br />

owner/operator, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the 2002 VIUS. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the American Transportation<br />

Research Institute (ATRI, 2006), only 26 percent of sleeper cab truck owners without antiidl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

technology are likely or very likely to purchase idle reduc<strong>in</strong>g technologies. This<br />

suggests that additional <strong>in</strong>centives will be required to achieve near-universal adoption of<br />

these technologies and realize the GHG benefit estimates cited above.<br />

Increased Truck Size and Weight Limits<br />

Description<br />

Increased truck size and weight limits allow<br />

truck operators to carry more goods per<br />

truck, us<strong>in</strong>g heavier or longer trucks than are<br />

currently allowed. This basic improvement<br />

<strong>in</strong> productivity per truck translates to fewer<br />

trucks on the road, reduced fuel<br />

consumption, and reduced greenhouse gas<br />

emissions. For example, a 129,000-pound<br />

longer comb<strong>in</strong>ation vehicle (LCV) consist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of a truck tow<strong>in</strong>g two 33-foot trailers can<br />

carry a payload that is 60 percent higher than<br />

a conventional five-axle semi while us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

only 31 percent more fuel (derived from data<br />

<strong>in</strong> Jack Faucett Associates, 1991).<br />

Increased Truck Size and Weight Limits<br />

Benefits: Low: 0.6 mmt CO2e <strong>in</strong> 2030<br />

Direct Costs: Low: m<strong>in</strong>imal direct costs<br />

Net Included Costs: Net sav<strong>in</strong>gs: -$1,200/tonne<br />

Confidence <strong>in</strong> Estimates: Moderate<br />

• Cont<strong>in</strong>gent upon limit<strong>in</strong>g to markets not<br />

competitive with rail<br />

Key Co-Benefits and Impacts: Uncerta<strong>in</strong><br />

• Unclear whether positive or negative safety<br />

impacts<br />

• Cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs to shippers<br />

Feasibility: Moderate<br />

• Primary political concern is over safety<br />

Key Policy Options:<br />

• Federal policy change to <strong>in</strong>crease size and<br />

weight limits<br />

26 EPA SmartWay’s Model State Idl<strong>in</strong>g Law, EPA420-S-06-001, April, 2006, <strong>in</strong>corporated broad<br />

stakeholder <strong>in</strong>put <strong>in</strong>to its recommendations for a uniform approach to idle reduction policy.<br />

4-45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!