11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Transportations <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

environmental fee is highly dependent upon the fee level and whether the fees collected<br />

are applied to other GHG mitigation strategies. High fee levels could obta<strong>in</strong> reductions at<br />

similar cost-effectiveness to a can ban, but the cost-effectiveness of lower fees would<br />

depend strongly on the cost-effectiveness of the mitigation strategy to which the fees<br />

would be applied (CARB, 2008c).<br />

Alternative refrigerant cost estimates are not frequently cited <strong>in</strong> the literature. Based on<br />

current estimates, refrigerant costs for HFC-1234yf will likely be the highest of the three<br />

alternatives discussed above, but the complete systems for this refrigerant will be very<br />

similar or <strong>in</strong>terchangeable with current designs, so the system costs will likely be the<br />

lowest. HFC-1234yf systems may cost around $40 more per vehicle than current systems.<br />

HFC-152a will have greater system costs than HFC-1234yf due to toxicity mitigation,<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an estimated cost of around $50 more per vehicle. R-744 will have the highest<br />

costs due to requir<strong>in</strong>g larger components that are much different than those <strong>in</strong> current use,<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> systems that could cost $200 more than current systems. 68<br />

Secondary loop systems will add cost and complexity to vehicles. While specific cost<br />

estimates were not found <strong>in</strong> the literature, estimates imply that the cost <strong>in</strong>crease would be<br />

low enough to easily be paid back by fuel sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> climates where air condition<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

used often (U.S. EPA, 2007d). Further cost and benefit analysis for secondary loop<br />

systems and other methods of reduc<strong>in</strong>g MAC system load are not performed due to lack<br />

of sufficient cost data <strong>in</strong> the literature.<br />

3-122<br />

R-744 systems may<br />

be more feasible <strong>in</strong> heavy-duty applications where the physical size requirements and<br />

system cost can be more easily managed.<br />

Cobenefits<br />

To the extent that eng<strong>in</strong>e loads are reduced, reductions <strong>in</strong> exhaust criteria pollutants may<br />

result. It is estimated that MAC compressor use can <strong>in</strong>crease emissions of NOx and carbon<br />

monoxide by 70 to 80 percent, and <strong>in</strong>crease hydrocarbon emissions by 30 percent<br />

(Farr<strong>in</strong>gton and Rugh, 2007). In addition, as system <strong>in</strong>tegrity and leak prevention become<br />

higher priorities, overall reliability <strong>in</strong>creases, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> lower ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />

requirements. After the change from CFC-12 to HFC-134a, reliability <strong>in</strong>creased due to the<br />

attention given to connections and leakage. The IMAC program is likely to result <strong>in</strong><br />

similar improvements.<br />

Feasibility<br />

Of the methods identified to reduce MAC system leakage from DIY servic<strong>in</strong>g, a can ban<br />

has the most significant barriers to implementation. Such a ban would completely<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>ate the small can refrigerant bus<strong>in</strong>ess. However, the economic impact would be<br />

68 Andersen (2008); Personal communication with Dr. Stephen Andersen, U.S. EPA.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!