11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Transportations <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

Magnitude and Tim<strong>in</strong>g of GHG Reductions<br />

Per-Vehicle Benefits<br />

Additional advances are assumed for HEV fuel economy over time, associated with<br />

further battery and other technology improvements. The AEO Reference case assumes<br />

HEV fuel economy improvement will <strong>in</strong>crease from 31.2 mpg <strong>in</strong> 2010 to 38.6 <strong>in</strong> 2030.<br />

Independent studies estimate current HEV mpg reductions between 17 and 60 percent,<br />

and future year HEV fuel economy levels between 26 and 54 percent <strong>in</strong> the medium to<br />

long term (Jones, 2008; Lutsey, 2008; McK<strong>in</strong>sey, 2009; Bandivadekar et al., 2008; IPCC,<br />

2007; Fulton and Cazzola, 2008). The percentage reduction ranges were applied to AEO<br />

base fuel economy estimates to obta<strong>in</strong> possible mpg ranges for HEVs. These figures are<br />

summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 3.2N. Although broader <strong>in</strong> range, the 2010 range is fully <strong>in</strong>clusive of<br />

the CAFE NPRM estimates of 25 to 40 percent for HEVs relative to a 2008 conventional<br />

vehicle(NHTSA, 2008b). 20<br />

Table 3.2H HEV Fuel Economy and Consumption Improvement<br />

Potential<br />

3-42<br />

Conventional Vehicle Scenario MPG<br />

Fuel Consumption<br />

Reduction Range<br />

MPG (AEO Base) M<strong>in</strong>imum Maximum M<strong>in</strong>imum Maximum<br />

2010 21.8 26.2 53.9 17% 60%<br />

2030+ 28.2 38.3 60.8 26% 54%<br />

Cost-Effectiveness<br />

<strong>Gas</strong>ol<strong>in</strong>e HEVs currently carry a cost premium over comparable conventional vehicles.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from the literature suggest <strong>in</strong>cremental costs between $3,700 and $5,700 <strong>in</strong> the<br />

near term, consistent with the CAFE NPRM estimates across two-mode and power-split<br />

HEVs 21<br />

(NHTSA, 2008b). Incremental costs are expected to fall somewhat <strong>in</strong> the medium<br />

to long term to $2,300 and $4,100 per LDV due to further advances <strong>in</strong> battery technology,<br />

and possibly further economies of scale and technological learn<strong>in</strong>g (Bandivadekar et al.,<br />

2008; Lutsey, 2008; McK<strong>in</strong>sey, 2009; IPCC, 2007; Fulton and Cazzola, 2008).<br />

This evaluation <strong>in</strong>dicates that HEVs offer the largest potential GHG reductions on a pervehicle<br />

basis short of plug-<strong>in</strong> HEVs (see Section 3.6), and appear to be generally cost-<br />

20 Range across two-mode and power-split hybrids.<br />

21 Comparable diesel HEV premiums are estimated to be somewhat higher <strong>in</strong> an EPA analysis,<br />

between $4,100 and $5,900 <strong>in</strong> the near term (EPA, 2005).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!