11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transportations <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

different fuel sources (hydrogen and electricity) and therefore are discussed <strong>in</strong> Section 2.0,<br />

Low-Carbon Fuels.<br />

This report focuses on the potential GHG benefits of each of these vehicle technology<br />

strategies if pursued <strong>in</strong>dividually. The benefit estimates rely on estimates of both pervehicle<br />

GHG reductions, and the potential market penetration of a given vehicle type. As<br />

such, the GHG benefits of <strong>in</strong>dividual vehicle technology strategies cannot be comb<strong>in</strong>ed to<br />

give total benefits. It is possible <strong>in</strong> the future that one particular technology path could be<br />

taken, or that multiple technologies could be used <strong>in</strong> different applications, depend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

upon where they are most advantageous. While beyond the scope of this report, estimates<br />

of total GHG benefits achievable from the light-duty vehicle sector could be developed<br />

through the analysis of alternative market penetration scenarios that comb<strong>in</strong>e different<br />

technology types. Nevertheless, the <strong>in</strong>formation presented <strong>in</strong> this report is helpful <strong>in</strong><br />

assess<strong>in</strong>g which vehicle technology options may provide the greatest benefits, as well as<br />

the costs or cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs that might be realized from each technology.<br />

Trends <strong>in</strong> Light-Duty Vehicle Use and Efficiency<br />

The total miles traveled by LDVs has <strong>in</strong>creased quite steadily over the past 35 years, more<br />

than doubl<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce 1970. Dur<strong>in</strong>g this time, both the total number of vehicles and the<br />

average miles traveled per vehicle have <strong>in</strong>creased considerably, as has the share of<br />

heavier, lower fuel efficiency SUVs and light trucks, which now constitut<strong>in</strong>g about half of<br />

all new vehicle sales <strong>in</strong> the United States (AEO Table 57). 8<br />

All of these factors have<br />

contributed to the steady growth <strong>in</strong> GHG emissions from LDVs. Other factors have<br />

tended to dim<strong>in</strong>ish LDV emissions dur<strong>in</strong>g this time, however. For example, the adoption<br />

of the CAFE standards <strong>in</strong> the 1970s significantly constra<strong>in</strong>ed GHG reductions over time.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the 2008 EPA Fuel Economy Trends report, “S<strong>in</strong>ce 1975, the fuel economy of<br />

the comb<strong>in</strong>ed car and light truck fleet has moved through several phases: 1) a rapid<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease from 1975 to the early 1980s, 2) a slow <strong>in</strong>crease to the fuel economy peak of<br />

22.0 mpg <strong>in</strong> 1987, 3) a gradual decl<strong>in</strong>e from the peak to 19.3 mpg <strong>in</strong> 2004, and<br />

4) consecutive annual <strong>in</strong>creases beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2005, grow<strong>in</strong>g to 20.8 mpg <strong>in</strong> 2008” (U.S.<br />

EPA, 2008a). Figure 3.2 displays these trends s<strong>in</strong>ce 1975.<br />

While LDV fuel economy has rema<strong>in</strong>ed relatively flat s<strong>in</strong>ce the mid 1980s, the automotive<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry has cont<strong>in</strong>ually improved the efficiency of the vehicles themselves. However,<br />

these advances have been used to enhance vehicle performance and utility, and to permit<br />

weight <strong>in</strong>creases, rather than <strong>in</strong> the service of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g miles per gallon rat<strong>in</strong>gs. In fact,<br />

8 The sales fraction of light trucks and SUVs has been roughly constant s<strong>in</strong>ce 2002 (U.S. EPA 2008),<br />

and is assumed to rema<strong>in</strong> at these levels <strong>in</strong>to future years for the purposes of this analysis.<br />

Heywood et al po<strong>in</strong>t out that even with sizable sw<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> these sales fractions (between 30 and<br />

70 percent), the result<strong>in</strong>g impact on fleet wide GHG emissions varies only by about 2 percent<br />

through 2035 (Heywood et al., 2008).<br />

3-21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!