11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transportation’s <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

Table 2.4 LDV Penetration and GHG Reductions Utiliz<strong>in</strong>g Five Percent<br />

of Natural <strong>Gas</strong> Supply<br />

Year<br />

2-32<br />

Incremental # CNG LDVs<br />

(Millions)<br />

<strong>Gas</strong>ol<strong>in</strong>e Saved<br />

(Mgal/Year)<br />

GHG Reduction<br />

(mmt CO2e/yr)<br />

2030 9.5-19.0 4.0-7.9 7-13<br />

Cost-Effectiveness<br />

The market price of CNG compares quite favorably with that of gasol<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> general. The<br />

AEO Reference case estimates retail national average CNG prices at $1.76 per gge <strong>in</strong> 2010,<br />

compared to $2.14 for gasol<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g taxes. 15 After taxes and credits, the near-term<br />

<strong>in</strong>cremental cost of CNG is estimated to be 33 cents per gallon <strong>in</strong> 2010. 16<br />

Under these<br />

assumptions, CNG obta<strong>in</strong>s a sav<strong>in</strong>gs relative to gasol<strong>in</strong>e (pretax/credit) when retail gas<br />

prices climb above $2.46 per gallon.<br />

A substantial cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs for CNG is expected to develop <strong>in</strong> the long run, with CNG<br />

prices ris<strong>in</strong>g only 16 percent between 2010 and 2030, while gasol<strong>in</strong>e prices are projected to<br />

17 <strong>in</strong>crease by almost 80 percent over this same period. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, a $1.07 per gallon<br />

sav<strong>in</strong>gs is estimated for CNG relative to gasol<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> 2030. Note this assessment assumes<br />

that CNG fuel<strong>in</strong>g station costs are fully recovered <strong>in</strong> the fuel sales price. 18<br />

15 See AEO Tables 12 and 13. Cost differentials are volatile, with fall<strong>in</strong>g gasol<strong>in</strong>e prices erod<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

cost advantage of CNG substantially relative to 2008 fuel prices. The Clean Cities reports also<br />

track the price of CNG over the past few years (U.S. DOE 2009g, p. 14). CNG prices tends to track<br />

with gasol<strong>in</strong>e and have similar seasonal spikes, <strong>in</strong> part because some of the supply comes from<br />

crude oil ref<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>in</strong> part, because natural gas experiences peak demand <strong>in</strong> the summer<br />

similar to gasol<strong>in</strong>e. Similar trends are expected for LNG as liquefaction costs are fairly constant<br />

over the year, although a much smaller market exists and less price data has been collected for<br />

LNG relative to CNG.<br />

16 Assum<strong>in</strong>g 18.3 cents per gge federal tax, no state tax, and a 50 cent per gge excise tax credit for<br />

CNG.<br />

17 AEO Tables 12 and 13.<br />

18 Fuel<strong>in</strong>g station costs are roughly $500,000 per California Energy Commission (2006). The above<br />

CNG prices assume the use of “fast-fill” retail stations. If fuel<strong>in</strong>g is performed us<strong>in</strong>g home<br />

refuel<strong>in</strong>g units, an additional cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs of about 15 cents per gge could be obta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

(http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/archive/aeo08/gas.html) Home refuel<strong>in</strong>g requires an additional<br />

(Footnote cont<strong>in</strong>ued on next page...)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!