11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transportation’s <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

Incremental costs for CNG LDVs range from approximately $3,000 to $6,000 for orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

equipment manufacturer (OEM) vehicles (NGA, no date), to approximately $15,000 for<br />

conversion of an exist<strong>in</strong>g gasol<strong>in</strong>e vehicle (NGVA, 2009). Much of the costs to the vehicle<br />

owner may be defrayed through tax credits, however. This analysis assumes the use of<br />

dedicated OEM vehicles <strong>in</strong> the medium to long term. In this timeframe, OEM vehicle costs<br />

would likely decrease under higher production volume scenarios (NGA, no date).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the lower value of $3,000 is assumed for the 2030 assessment.<br />

Table 2.5 summarizes the <strong>in</strong>cremental costs, sav<strong>in</strong>gs, and emission reduction benefits<br />

associated with CNG use as an alternative to gasol<strong>in</strong>e LDVs <strong>in</strong> 2030, with an estimated<br />

cost-effectiveness of -$132/tonne. One estimate was identified <strong>in</strong> the literature regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

potential cost-effectiveness of CNG vehicles <strong>in</strong> the medium term (McK<strong>in</strong>sey, 2009, page<br />

100), at approximately -$50/tonne. These negative cost per tonne values are likely the<br />

result of large fuel sav<strong>in</strong>gs assumed <strong>in</strong> these analyses.<br />

Table 2.5 CNG per Vehicle Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Ranges by Time<br />

Period<br />

Year<br />

Incremental<br />

Vehicle<br />

Cost MPGGE a<br />

Lifetime<br />

<strong>Gas</strong>ol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Saved<br />

(Gallons)<br />

Discounted<br />

Fuel<br />

Sav<strong>in</strong>gs b<br />

Net<br />

Discounted<br />

Cost/Sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Average GHG<br />

Reduction<br />

(Tonnes/Year)<br />

Dollars/<br />

Tonne –<br />

Calculated<br />

2030 $3,000 28 6,500 $4,460 -$1,460 0.7 -$132 to -$50<br />

a Equal to AEO 2030 conventional gasol<strong>in</strong>e vehicle.<br />

b Us<strong>in</strong>g pretax AEO gasol<strong>in</strong>e and CNG gge price projections for 2030 (long-term) of $3.43 and $2.36,<br />

respectively.<br />

Cobenefits<br />

Natural gas, as either LNG or CNG, is clean-burn<strong>in</strong>g and emits somewhat lower levels of<br />

particulate matter and ozone precursors compared to gasol<strong>in</strong>e or diesel light-duty<br />

vehicles. The GREET model estimates life-cycle reductions for dedicated CNG LDVs<br />

relative to conventional gasol<strong>in</strong>e vehicles, as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2.6. The differentials may<br />

vary, however, depend<strong>in</strong>g upon the gasol<strong>in</strong>e vehicle emissions control technology.<br />

$4,500 for the necessary slow-fill equipment (CRS, 2008). This analysis assumes exclusive use of<br />

fast-fill retail stations.<br />

2-33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!