11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Transportations <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

equivalent leakage emissions by 99.7 percent when HFC-134a is completely phased out.<br />

HFC-152 would reduce CO2 equivalent leakage emissions by 91.3 percent at full phaseout,<br />

and R-744 would reduce equivalent leakage emissions by 99.9 percent. Currently, a<br />

phaseout of HFC-134a is planned <strong>in</strong> the EU. This phaseout does not specify a replacement<br />

refrigerant, but rather that no new vehicle may be sold after 2011 conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g refrigerant<br />

with a GWP over 150 (U.S. EPA, 2007d).<br />

Little specific data exist compar<strong>in</strong>g the eng<strong>in</strong>e load requirements of the alternative<br />

refrigerants. The available data suggest that HFC-1234yf would <strong>in</strong>crease required eng<strong>in</strong>e<br />

load by 2.3 to 6 percent over HFC-134a. R-744, however, would <strong>in</strong>crease eng<strong>in</strong>e load by<br />

70 percent to 100 percent over HFC-134a (Atk<strong>in</strong>son, 2008). The move to alternative<br />

refrigerants represents a long-term option for GHG reduction <strong>in</strong> the case of HFC-152a and<br />

R-744, as <strong>in</strong>use vehicles are not likely to be retrofitted with this refrigerant. HFC-1234yf<br />

may be used with current vehicles with little to no modification, mak<strong>in</strong>g it possible that<br />

GHG benefits for this refrigerant could be realized <strong>in</strong> the short term, if research shows that<br />

direct substitution <strong>in</strong>to current R-134a systems is feasible.<br />

In addition, accord<strong>in</strong>g to a 2004 report, it was estimated that mechanical loads from LDV<br />

MAC system use <strong>in</strong>creases fleetwide gasol<strong>in</strong>e consumption by 7 billion gallons per year<br />

(U.S. EPA, 2009d), or approximately 5 percent of total LDV consumption <strong>in</strong> 2010.<br />

Reduction of vehicle cool<strong>in</strong>g loads can reduce these emissions. Solar reflective glaz<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

and pa<strong>in</strong>ts can reduce MAC fuel use by up to 30 percent (Rugh et al., 2006). If new<br />

vehicles adopted secondary loop systems, a reduction <strong>in</strong> fuel use also could be realized. It<br />

is estimated that a small car operat<strong>in</strong>g with a secondary loop system with HFC-152a<br />

refrigerant would have 21 percent lower MAC-related fuel usage than a similar vehicle<br />

with a conventional MAC system. The implementation of improved compressor cycl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and control, coupled with more efficient compressors and heat exchangers, also could<br />

result <strong>in</strong> fuel consumption reductions of up to 30 percent. 67<br />

Cost-Effectiveness<br />

It is expected that these<br />

technologies could enter the market <strong>in</strong> the next few years but would likely only affect new<br />

vehicles sold, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> these reductions only be<strong>in</strong>g realized <strong>in</strong> the medium term (U.S.<br />

EPA, 2007e).<br />

Cost estimates for DIY MAC service restrictions are taken from California ARB estimates.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>creased cost of a DIY “can ban” comes primarily from the <strong>in</strong>creased cost of<br />

professional vehicle servic<strong>in</strong>g. It is estimated that the cost <strong>in</strong>crease, borne primarily by<br />

consumers that had previously performed DIY service on their own vehicles, would be<br />

$135 per tonne CO2e. Implement<strong>in</strong>g a deposit program also would create additional costs<br />

for the consumer. It is estimated that this type of program to reduce heel emissions would<br />

cost between $9 and $19 per tonne CO2e, largely paid for by consumers <strong>in</strong> the form of<br />

more costly conta<strong>in</strong>ers and shipp<strong>in</strong>g logistics. The cost-effectiveness of add<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

67 Personal communication with Dr. Stephen Andersen, U.S. EPA.<br />

3-121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!