11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Transportation's</strong> <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 1<br />

3-26<br />

Table 3.1 Potential Petroleum Sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> 2030 107<br />

Petroleum Sav<strong>in</strong>gs (billions of gallons of<br />

gasol<strong>in</strong>e and diesel)<br />

Strategy Family<br />

Low High<br />

Price Carbon 6.3 10.4<br />

Improve Transportation On-road 4.6 8.0<br />

System Efficiency<br />

Air, Rail, Mar<strong>in</strong>e 1.8 5.1<br />

Reduce Carbon-Intensive Travel Activity 12.1 40.3<br />

Source: Cambridge Systematics analysis.<br />

Note: Vehicle efficiency and low carbon fuels strategies are not <strong>in</strong>cluded here because of ongo<strong>in</strong>g<br />

rulemak<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

NHTSA, <strong>in</strong> its prelim<strong>in</strong>ary rulemak<strong>in</strong>g for revised CAFE standards as required<br />

by the Energy Independence and Security Act, reviews literature on the<br />

economic costs of dependence on foreign oil, and therefore the benefit of fuel<br />

sav<strong>in</strong>gs result<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>in</strong>creased CAFE standards. NHTSA estimates the benefits<br />

related to oil supply disruptions and monopsony costs (higher prices for<br />

petroleum products result<strong>in</strong>g from the effect of U.S. oil import demand on the<br />

world oil price) to range from about $0.108 to $0.539 per gallon saved, with a best<br />

estimate of $0.298 per gallon. These estimates do not <strong>in</strong>clude reduced outlays for<br />

military operations, as NHTSA concludes that fuel efficiency standards will not<br />

materially affect these costs. 108<br />

As vehicle fuel efficiency and low-carbon fuel strategies are implemented,<br />

transportation cont<strong>in</strong>ues to fulfill the same function (mov<strong>in</strong>g people and goods)<br />

with little impact on mobility or accessibility. In contrast, most system efficiency<br />

strategies have significant mobility cobenefits, especially travel time sav<strong>in</strong>gs and<br />

107 This table is based on rough estimates of fuel sav<strong>in</strong>gs for <strong>in</strong>dividual strategies. For all<br />

strategies except low-carbon fuels, these estimates were derived by back-calculat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

fuel sav<strong>in</strong>gs based on the GHG reductions from the strategy, consider<strong>in</strong>g the carbon<br />

content of gasol<strong>in</strong>e, diesel, and/or jet fuel as appropriate for the strategy. Conversion<br />

factors of 9.16, 10.56, and 9.95 kg CO2e per gallon were used respectively for gasol<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

diesel, and jet fuel reflect<strong>in</strong>g the carbon content of the fuel (8.81, 10.15 ,and 9.57<br />

kg/gallon) <strong>in</strong>flated by 4 percent to account for non-CO2 GHG emissions. The gasol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

conversion factor was used for strategies affect<strong>in</strong>g light-duty vehicle travel, the diesel<br />

factor for strategies affect<strong>in</strong>g heavy-duty, rail, and mar<strong>in</strong>e travel, and the jet fuel factor<br />

for strategies affect<strong>in</strong>g aviation. For strategies affect<strong>in</strong>g all highway travel, factors were<br />

weighted 69 percent gasol<strong>in</strong>e and 31 percent diesel, based on the fraction of these<br />

vehicles used <strong>in</strong> on-road vehicles as estimated from FHWA’s Highway Statistics. .<br />

108 National Highway and Traffic Safety Adm<strong>in</strong>istration (2009). Corporate Average Fuel<br />

Economy for MY 2012-2016 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks: Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary Regulatory Impact<br />

Analysis. Figures are <strong>in</strong> 2007 U.S. dollars.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!