11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Transportation’s <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

Even if emissions levels per tonne are higher from mar<strong>in</strong>e vessels, the net health impacts<br />

of these emissions will be lower if they are concentrated offshore, away from populated<br />

areas, as opposed to land-based truck and rail traffic concentrated near populated areas.<br />

Feasibility<br />

Public <strong>in</strong>vestment may be required <strong>in</strong> subsidiz<strong>in</strong>g services such as short-sea shipp<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong><br />

order to establish services that may not be viable for the private sector. Substantial<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> fuel costs could potentially make short-sea shipp<strong>in</strong>g more competitive. Shortsea<br />

shipp<strong>in</strong>g has some unique additional constra<strong>in</strong>ts. As for truck-rail movements, costs<br />

are largely determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the cost of handl<strong>in</strong>g shipments at the <strong>in</strong>terchanges. The<br />

handl<strong>in</strong>g costs at ports are often high – the result of labor agreements as well as lower<br />

productivity rates <strong>in</strong> mov<strong>in</strong>g small volumes of conta<strong>in</strong>er or trailers to and from barges<br />

compared to ocean-go<strong>in</strong>g conta<strong>in</strong>erships. An additional constra<strong>in</strong>t on short-sea shipp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

is the Jones Act, which restricts water transport of cargo between U.S. ports to U.S.flagged<br />

carriers. The provisions of the Jones Act protects U.S.-flagged carriers from<br />

competition by lower-cost foreign carriers (lower cost because the foreign carriers may be<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g under less rigorous labor, safety, and environmental regulations), but those<br />

provisions also make short-sea shipp<strong>in</strong>g more costly and less competitive than domestic<br />

truck<strong>in</strong>g and rail-freight service.<br />

Rail and Intermodal Term<strong>in</strong>al Operations<br />

Description<br />

<strong>Emissions</strong> may be reduced from<br />

locomotives through reduced idl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

or other operational efficiencies.<br />

Operat<strong>in</strong>g efficiency improvements<br />

may be realized by reliev<strong>in</strong>g<br />

chokepo<strong>in</strong>ts as discussed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

previous strategy, as well as by<br />

implement<strong>in</strong>g revised operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

procedures and idle reduction<br />

technologies <strong>in</strong> rail yards.<br />

The most significant efficiency<br />

benefits may be from switcher<br />

locomotives, which spend virtually<br />

all of their time with<strong>in</strong> a rail yard,<br />

assembl<strong>in</strong>g and disassembl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>s. Switcher locomotives never<br />

reach high speeds and can spend up<br />

to 75 percent of their time idl<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

consum<strong>in</strong>g 27 percent of their fuel<br />

while idl<strong>in</strong>g (Argonne, 2009). Idle<br />

4-64<br />

Rail and Intermodal Term<strong>in</strong>al Operations<br />

Benefits: Low: 1-2 mmt CO2e <strong>in</strong> 2030<br />

• Includes only switchyard idle reduction and railhighway<br />

grade cross<strong>in</strong>g elim<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Direct Costs: Unknown<br />

Net Included Costs: Unknown<br />

• Net sav<strong>in</strong>gs for locomotive idl<strong>in</strong>g reduction<br />

Confidence <strong>in</strong> Estimates: Low<br />

• Benefits of chokepo<strong>in</strong>t relief, rail operations, and<br />

port/term<strong>in</strong>al equipment unknown<br />

Key Co-Benefits and Impacts: Positive<br />

• Air quality benefits from reduced idl<strong>in</strong>g and other<br />

emissions; cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs to shippers<br />

Feasibility: Moderate<br />

• Some idle reduction <strong>in</strong>itiatives undertaken at a State<br />

level<br />

Key Policy Options:<br />

• Investment <strong>in</strong> rail and <strong>in</strong>termodal <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

• Regulations or voluntary partnerships with railroads<br />

to promote GHG assessment and reduction practices<br />

(e.g., idle reduction)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!