11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary of Impacts<br />

Transportation’s <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

Highway operations and management strategies <strong>in</strong>clude traffic management (signal<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ation, ramp meter<strong>in</strong>g, faster clearance of <strong>in</strong>cidents), real-time traveler <strong>in</strong>formation,<br />

and highway bottleneck relief. These strategies have an emission reduction effect by<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g congestion and smooth<strong>in</strong>g traffic flow, thus reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>efficient vehicle operation.<br />

However, the improved conditions they create also result <strong>in</strong> some amount of additional travel<br />

and thus additional emissions through a phenomenon known as <strong>in</strong>duced demand (see section<br />

4.1.4 and Appendix A). Whether the emission-<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g effect of <strong>in</strong>duced demand<br />

outweighs the emission reduc<strong>in</strong>g effect of congestion reduction and traffic smooth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

depends on the amount of <strong>in</strong>duced demand and on the particulars of the strategy.<br />

Quantify<strong>in</strong>g the magnitude of <strong>in</strong>duced travel demand and the impact of this extra traffic on<br />

travel speeds and traffic flow is particularly challeng<strong>in</strong>g, and further research is needed. 1 An<br />

additional source of uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty relates to the vehicle technology or fuels used by future<br />

vehicles, which could further reduce any benefits from congestion reductions strategies. 2<br />

Because of these uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties, numerical estimates are not <strong>in</strong>cluded for highway operations<br />

and management strategies <strong>in</strong> Volume 1 of this report, though outside estimates are <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />

here <strong>in</strong> Volume 2 both <strong>in</strong> this summary section (directly below) and <strong>in</strong> the more detailed<br />

Section 4.2. The estimates presented <strong>in</strong> this section are taken from outside studies and should<br />

be considered illustrative. Despite these uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties, it is worth not<strong>in</strong>g that congestion relief<br />

strategies yield significant cobenefits by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the time travelers spend on the road due to<br />

congestion and delay. Traffic management strategies are technologies and practices to<br />

reduce congestion and smooth traffic flow through improved traffic operations and<br />

management, such as signal coord<strong>in</strong>ation, faster clearance of <strong>in</strong>cidents, and freeway ramp<br />

meter<strong>in</strong>g. Outside studies have <strong>in</strong>corporated simplified assumptions regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>duced<br />

demand to estimate the GHG impacts of highway operations and management strategies.<br />

Analysis for the Mov<strong>in</strong>g Cooler study (Cambridge Systematics, 2009) suggests that widespread<br />

deployment of traffic management strategies would reduce transportation GHG emissions by<br />

a modest 3 amount, 0.5 percent or less <strong>in</strong> 2030. The study found that <strong>in</strong> 2050, there would still<br />

be net emission reductions.<br />

1 U.S. DOT is design<strong>in</strong>g research to provide a better understand<strong>in</strong>g of the role of <strong>in</strong>duced demand<br />

<strong>in</strong> offsett<strong>in</strong>g GHG improvements from congestion reduction strategies.<br />

2 If vehicle technology evolves to rely heavily on electric-drivetra<strong>in</strong> technology (such as hybrids, batteryelectrics,<br />

or fuel-cell vehicles), the energy and GHG benefits of congestion reduction will be greatly<br />

reduced or disappear altogether. Because the efficiency of these vehicles typically is not reduced at<br />

lower speeds, their emission levels stay relatively constant even under congested conditions. In<br />

addition, for any highway operations strategy, future improvements <strong>in</strong> fuel efficiency or reductions <strong>in</strong><br />

the carbon content of fuels beyond the basel<strong>in</strong>e assumed <strong>in</strong> this report will lead to lower absolute<br />

benefits from any of these strategies.<br />

3 In this report, when referr<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>dividual strategy effects, “modest” refers to reductions <strong>in</strong> CO2e<br />

emissions of less than 0.5 percent of total transportation emissions, or 12 mmt <strong>in</strong> 2030; “moderate”<br />

to reductions <strong>in</strong> the range of 0.5 to 2.5 percent of total transportation emissions, or 12 to 60 mmt <strong>in</strong><br />

(Footnote cont<strong>in</strong>ued on next page...)<br />

4-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!