11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transportation’s <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

account, cost-effectiveness is estimated to range from -$40 to -$80 per tonne (Cambridge<br />

Systematics, 2009). S<strong>in</strong>ce there was no net benefit from bottleneck relief over the 2010-<br />

2050 period once <strong>in</strong>duced demand was <strong>in</strong>cluded, cost per tonne could not be calculated <strong>in</strong><br />

this scenario.<br />

Cobenefits<br />

Bottleneck relief will have strong cobenefits <strong>in</strong> terms of reduced delay (time sav<strong>in</strong>gs) for<br />

passenger and freight travelers and reduced vehicle operat<strong>in</strong>g costs. These time and cost<br />

sav<strong>in</strong>gs for travel are then passed along as benefits to the larger economy. Low-cost<br />

bottleneck treatments have proven to be highly cost effective, even when travel time<br />

sav<strong>in</strong>gs is the only criterion used. For example, three low-cost bottleneck projects <strong>in</strong> the<br />

M<strong>in</strong>neapolis–St. Paul area (rang<strong>in</strong>g from $2.6 to $10.5 million) produced delay reductions<br />

of 87,000 to over 1 million hours annually, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a benefit/cost ratio of between 3:1<br />

and 13:1 (FHWA, 2007b). This study did not consider <strong>in</strong>duced demand effects.<br />

With the exception of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), other major categories of automobile<br />

emissions will be reduced with the reduction <strong>in</strong> congestion. Also, because crash history is<br />

generally addressed when major <strong>in</strong>terchanges are redesigned, there will be safety benefits<br />

as well. All of these benefits accrue over multiple years after improvements are made.<br />

The American Highway Users Alliance estimated the total benefits <strong>in</strong> several categories<br />

from improv<strong>in</strong>g the top 223 bottlenecks <strong>in</strong> the country (Table 4.3). These benefits are<br />

assumed to accumulate over the course of 20 years after improvements are made, and are<br />

for all vehicles mov<strong>in</strong>g through the bottlenecks’ areas of <strong>in</strong>fluence, which was assumed to<br />

extend for five miles (two and one-half miles <strong>in</strong> each direction from the bottleneck).<br />

Aga<strong>in</strong>, this study did not consider any offsett<strong>in</strong>g reductions <strong>in</strong> benefits as a result of<br />

<strong>in</strong>duced demand.<br />

Table 4.3 Total Benefits from Improv<strong>in</strong>g the Nation’s Worst Traffic<br />

Bottlenecks (223 Locations)<br />

Reduction Due to<br />

Improvement<br />

Percentage Change Over<br />

Benefit Type<br />

(Over 20 Years of Project Life) Five-Mile Segment<br />

Carbon Monoxide (million tons) 27.1 -54%<br />

Volatile Organic Compounds (million<br />

tons)<br />

2.7 -50%<br />

Carbon Dioxide (million tons) 390 -77%<br />

Total Delay (million hours) 48,100 -77%<br />

Total Fuel Sav<strong>in</strong>gs (million gallons) 40,011,800 -77%<br />

Total Crashes 449,600 N/A<br />

Source: AHUA, 2004.<br />

4-35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!