11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transportation’s <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

consequent fuel sav<strong>in</strong>gs could be achieved on all switchyard locomotives, GHG emissions<br />

could potentially be reduced by up to 680,000 metric tonnes CO2e annually. 33<br />

A study exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g rail gateway chokepo<strong>in</strong>t improvements <strong>in</strong> New Orleans estimated that<br />

the improvements would elim<strong>in</strong>ate 91 hours per week of rail idl<strong>in</strong>g (Brown Cunn<strong>in</strong>gham<br />

Gannuch, 2007). This translates <strong>in</strong>to a reduction of 215 metric tonnes of CO2e per year.<br />

No data have been developed to extrapolate similar estimates to chokepo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

improvements at a national level.<br />

Rail-highway grade separation projects also should have a GHG benefit by reduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

vehicle delay. A study <strong>in</strong> Riverside County, California estimate that 20 proposed grade<br />

separation projects <strong>in</strong> the county would elim<strong>in</strong>ate 2,700 daily vehicle hours of delay <strong>in</strong><br />

2030, reduc<strong>in</strong>g annual GHG emissions by 544 tonnes (Riverside County Transportation<br />

Commission, 2008). Assum<strong>in</strong>g that similar benefits per cross<strong>in</strong>g could be achieved<br />

elsewhere, clos<strong>in</strong>g 10 percent of the 225,000 grade cross<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the U.S. would reduce<br />

GHG emissions by 611,000 tonnes annually. 34<br />

Efficiency improvements to rail operations such as switch yard idle reduction can be<br />

implemented relatively quickly—with<strong>in</strong> a few years—compared to major capital<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestments such as chokepo<strong>in</strong>t relief. Idle reduction technologies can be applied to<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g locomotives.<br />

The evolution of rail vehicle technology has the potential to affect the future benefits of<br />

operational strategies. In particular, the use of hybrid-electric locomotives would likely<br />

reduce the GHG emissions associated with idl<strong>in</strong>g and other <strong>in</strong>efficient movements,<br />

thereby also reduc<strong>in</strong>g the emissions benefits of strategies to reduce these movements.<br />

(Hybrid-electric locomotives are discussed <strong>in</strong> more detail <strong>in</strong> Section 3.0, Energy<br />

Efficiency.) However, locomotives tend to have a useful life of 40 years or more, so this<br />

effect will occur slowly as the fleet turns over.<br />

Cost-Effectiveness<br />

Comprehensive cost-effectiveness estimates for the operations benefits of rail<br />

improvements have not been developed. Idle reduction technologies for locomotives can<br />

cost as little as $4,000 to $7,000 for electrification or automatic eng<strong>in</strong>e shut-down/start-up,<br />

or up to $35,000 for a diesel-driven heat<strong>in</strong>g system; these costs can be offset through fuel<br />

sav<strong>in</strong>gs. In a test <strong>in</strong> a Chicago rail yard, the comb<strong>in</strong>ed sav<strong>in</strong>gs from locomotive idle<br />

reduction technology was estimated to have a payback period of about 2.5 years at $1.00<br />

per gallon of diesel fuel (EPA, 2004).<br />

33 This calculation assumes total annual switchyard fuel consumption of 311 million gallons (DOT<br />

R-1 forms 2009), 27 percent consumed <strong>in</strong> idl<strong>in</strong>g (Argonne), an 80 percent reduction <strong>in</strong> idl<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />

0.0101 metric tonnes CO2 per gallon of diesel fuel. It does not account for the offsett<strong>in</strong>g fuel use<br />

from the idle reduction technologies.<br />

34 Grade cross<strong>in</strong>g data from FRA (2009).<br />

4-66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!