11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transportations <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

On-road heavy-duty vehicle strategies can provide significant GHG reductions as well,<br />

beyond efficiency improvements already considered <strong>in</strong> basel<strong>in</strong>e projections. Unlike most<br />

vehicle strategies evaluated here, retrofits of heavy-duty trucks (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g aerodynamic<br />

fair<strong>in</strong>gs, trailer side skirts, and low-roll<strong>in</strong>g resistance tires, among others), particularly<br />

long-haul freight trucks, can provide significant reductions <strong>in</strong> the near term. Most of these<br />

technologies currently are available. Significant additional reductions <strong>in</strong> the medium to<br />

long term are possible for eng<strong>in</strong>e and powertra<strong>in</strong> modifications that require time to<br />

penetrate the fleet. Examples of emerg<strong>in</strong>g powertra<strong>in</strong> technologies <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

turbocompound<strong>in</strong>g, bottom<strong>in</strong>g cycle, and hybridization. Some of these technologies are<br />

proven and are beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to penetrate the market (such as hybridization), while others<br />

(such as bottom<strong>in</strong>g cycle) require further research and demonstration. Per vehicle costs<br />

can be sizeable, at least $10,000 for aggressive tractor and trailer retrofits, to over $20,000<br />

per unit for a full suite of retrofit, eng<strong>in</strong>e, and powertra<strong>in</strong> improvements us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

conventional technologies, or over $60,000 us<strong>in</strong>g advanced technologies on large (Class 8)<br />

trucks. Most of these improvements yield net cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs over the lifetime of the vehicle<br />

due to fuel sav<strong>in</strong>gs, assum<strong>in</strong>g basel<strong>in</strong>e AEO fuel price projections.<br />

Bus strategies, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g hybridization and fuel cells, offer substantial reductions on a per<br />

vehicle basis. However, the entire bus sector, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g transit buses, school buses, and<br />

<strong>in</strong>tercity buses, is responsible for less than 1 percent of total on-road GHG emissions <strong>in</strong> the<br />

U.S (about 20 mmt CO2e). As such, no strategy offers more than modest reduction GHG<br />

potential, with benefits and costs only addressed qualitatively <strong>in</strong> this section. While<br />

technology options are generally available, capital costs currently are high due to low<br />

production volumes and other factors, although <strong>in</strong>itial costs will be at least partially<br />

recouped over time through operat<strong>in</strong>g cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

GHG reductions are possible through the use of genset and hybrid locomotives <strong>in</strong> rail<br />

yards (35 to 60 percent per locomotive), as well as through improvements to l<strong>in</strong>e-haul<br />

locomotives and tra<strong>in</strong> sets, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g more efficient l<strong>in</strong>e-haul locomotives (10 to 20 percent<br />

improvement), lightweight cars, aerodynamic improvements, wheel-to-rail lubrication<br />

technologies, and drive system operation (22 to 31 percent comb<strong>in</strong>ed improvement per<br />

tra<strong>in</strong>). All of these technologies are commercialized and available for immediate use,<br />

although some must be phased <strong>in</strong> over time as fleet turnover occurs. While <strong>in</strong>curr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

higher up-front capital costs, most of these strategies have the potential to pay for<br />

themselves <strong>in</strong> less than 10 years through fuel cost sav<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Improvements to mar<strong>in</strong>e vessel design can reduce fuel consumption and GHG emissions<br />

by 2 to 35 percent per vessel. Changes to propulsion systems (such as diesel-electric or<br />

hybrid systems) can have a similar impact for vessels that vary their operations frequently<br />

such as harbor vessel, cruise ships and vessels <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> short sea shipments. Changes<br />

<strong>in</strong> propeller design can improve efficiency by 4 to 15 percent while solar photovoltaic<br />

technologies can provide a fuel sav<strong>in</strong>gs and GHG reduction of 5 to 7 percent. In the<br />

longer term, application of devices that utilize w<strong>in</strong>d power to supplement vessel energy<br />

supply may provide fuel sav<strong>in</strong>gs between 5 and 30 percent for long-distance vessels. All<br />

of these technologies are commercially available, although solar photovoltaics are still<br />

expensive and w<strong>in</strong>d power rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the demonstration stages. While some<br />

technologies (such as propeller designs and solar panels) can be retrofit on exist<strong>in</strong>g vessels<br />

3-9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!