11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Transportations <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

Fossil Diesel<br />

Despite the growth of alternative fuels and technologies, diesel is still the dom<strong>in</strong>ant fuel<br />

for the transit bus sector. Because of the high-energy density of diesel fuel and the<br />

thermodynamics of compression-ignition eng<strong>in</strong>es, diesel-powered vehicles tend to have<br />

good fuel efficiency. However, they emit have historically emitted relatively high<br />

amounts of certa<strong>in</strong> types of air pollutants, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g NOx and particulate matter.<br />

Consequently, Federal regulations have <strong>in</strong>creased emission standards for heavy-duty<br />

vehicles and required the use of ultra low-sulfur diesel, both of which <strong>in</strong>crease the capital<br />

and operat<strong>in</strong>g cost of a transit bus somewhat (Clark et al, 2007). S<strong>in</strong>ce 2004, U.S. EPA’s<br />

National Clean Diesel Campaign has been seek<strong>in</strong>g to improve the environmental<br />

performance of diesel eng<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> many sectors through both regulatory and voluntary<br />

measures, and as a result, diesel eng<strong>in</strong>es are cleaner than ever (U.S. EPA, 2009b).<br />

Compressed and Liquefied Natural <strong>Gas</strong><br />

While natural gas generally combusts more cleanly than diesel and gasol<strong>in</strong>e, there are no<br />

clear greenhouse gas-reduction benefits from CNG or LNG buses (Clark et al, 2007) as<br />

total GHG emissions are about the same on a per-mile basis as for diesel buses. This is<br />

especially true if CNG is mishandled and leaks occur, s<strong>in</strong>ce CNG is composed of 85-<br />

99 percent methane (IEA, 2002) a potent greenhouse gas. CNG has historically been costcompetitive<br />

compared to diesel fuel, but transit buses us<strong>in</strong>g CNG require an expensive<br />

fuel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>frastructure consist<strong>in</strong>g of high-pressure storage, compressors, and dispensers.<br />

The median costs of modify<strong>in</strong>g CNG/LNG-ready bus depots and build<strong>in</strong>g refuel<strong>in</strong>g<br />

stations have been found to be around $875,000 and $2 million respectively (<strong>in</strong> 2007<br />

dollars). However, once a fuel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>frastructure is established, the operat<strong>in</strong>g costs of a<br />

CNG/LNG fleet can be lower than for other technologies, due to lower overall fuel and<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance costs (Clark et al, 2007). However, CNG and LNG have lower energy<br />

content than diesel fuels, reduc<strong>in</strong>g the total driv<strong>in</strong>g range compared to diesel. There were<br />

6,600 CNG and 1,000 LNG transit buses operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the United States as of January 2005<br />

(CCAP, no date).<br />

Electric and Hybrid-Electric Systems<br />

Electric and hybrid-electric vehicles are steadily grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> popularity across transit bus<br />

fleets. Pure electric vehicles, powered by on-board batteries, are quiet and do not directly<br />

emit pollutants <strong>in</strong>to the atmosphere, characteristics that make them highly desirable <strong>in</strong><br />

communities where a premium is placed on local air quality. Hybrid diesel-electric and<br />

gasol<strong>in</strong>e-electric vehicles are powered <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation by an <strong>in</strong>ternal combustion eng<strong>in</strong>e<br />

and an electric motor. These buses can obta<strong>in</strong> 10 to 50 percent better fuel efficiency than<br />

their conventional diesel counterparts, with similar reductions <strong>in</strong> GHG emissions (IEA,<br />

2002; Greene and Schafer, 2003; CCAP, no date). Actual <strong>in</strong>-service fuel efficiency<br />

improvements depend strongly on the duty cycle of the bus; hybrids are most<br />

advantageous when used on routes with more stop-start cycles, hills, and time where the<br />

bus is at rest (such as <strong>in</strong> traffic or at passenger stops). While hybrid diesel-electric systems<br />

are ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> popularity, vehicles us<strong>in</strong>g this technology are still relatively expensive<br />

3-84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!