11.01.2013 Views

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

Transportation's Role in Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Transportation’s <strong>Role</strong> <strong>in</strong> Reduc<strong>in</strong>g U.S. <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> <strong>Emissions</strong>: Volume 2<br />

Magnitude and Tim<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>Greenhouse</strong> <strong>Gas</strong> Reductions<br />

Optimal operat<strong>in</strong>g speeds vary depend<strong>in</strong>g on a number of factors. An evaluation of 11<br />

different light-duty gasol<strong>in</strong>e makes and models found their optimal speed ranged from 25<br />

to 55 mph (GAO, 2008). Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the benefit of establish<strong>in</strong>g a uniform speed limit will<br />

vary from vehicle to vehicle. In addition, the fuel consumption benefit also varies<br />

depend<strong>in</strong>g upon the <strong>in</strong>itial basel<strong>in</strong>e speed of the vehicle. For example, us<strong>in</strong>g EPA’s<br />

Physical Emission Rate Estimator (PERE) model, a 2009 Toyota Camry is estimated to<br />

improve its fuel efficiency by approximately 2.4 mpg when slow<strong>in</strong>g from 60 to 55 mph. A<br />

larger reduction from 70 to 55 mph will result <strong>in</strong> a 6.1 mpg improvement (U.S. EPA,<br />

2005a). Heavy-duty diesel vehicles are estimated to obta<strong>in</strong> a 0.1 mpg improvement<br />

(approximately 1.5 percent improvement) on average per one mph of speed reduction at<br />

highway speeds (U.S. EPA, 2004).<br />

Special Report 204: 55: A Decade of Experience, published <strong>in</strong> 1984 by the Transportation<br />

Research Board, evaluated the national 55 miles per hour speed limit imposed <strong>in</strong> 1974 and<br />

concluded that it resulted <strong>in</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs of about two percent of annual gasol<strong>in</strong>e consumption<br />

while <strong>in</strong> effect (TRB, 1984).<br />

A recent DOE evaluation estimated that a 55 mph speed limit implemented at the national<br />

level could result <strong>in</strong> a fuel consumption sav<strong>in</strong>gs between 175,000 and 275,000 barrels of oil<br />

per day, or about 27 to 43 mmt CO2e per year, which represents about 1.6 to 2.4 percent of<br />

on-road vehicle fuel consumption and emissions. For this assessment DOE assumed that<br />

35 percent of all on-road mileage would be impacted by the reduced speed limit, along<br />

with a 50 percent compliance rate (GAO, 2008). The non-compliance rate ranged from<br />

49% to 54% of traffic exceed<strong>in</strong>g 55 mph on all highways marked at 55 mph for the period<br />

1980 to 1983, accord<strong>in</strong>g to speed data reported by the States to the Federal government<br />

from automated devices embedded <strong>in</strong> pavements (TRB, 1984). Future compliance rates<br />

would depend on enforcement and public acceptance.<br />

An International Energy Agency study us<strong>in</strong>g a mechanical eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g equation of fuel<br />

efficiency by speed found that comprehensive enforcement of a 55 mph speed limit could<br />

generate a reduction of up to 3.2 percent <strong>in</strong> fuel consumption and thus GHG emissions <strong>in</strong><br />

the U.S. (IEA, 2005), or about 56 mmt CO2e per year.<br />

The benefits will be lower if vehicle fuel efficiency improves beyond the basel<strong>in</strong>e levels<br />

assumed <strong>in</strong> this analysis. Changes <strong>in</strong> vehicle technology also could affect the magnitude<br />

of benefits from speed limit reductions. For example, hybrids are expected to constitute<br />

an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g fraction of the light-duty fleet over time. Fuel consumption <strong>in</strong> light-duty<br />

hybrid gasol<strong>in</strong>e vehicles rises disproportionately quickly above 50 mph, compared with<br />

conventional vehicles. To illustrate, the PERE model predicts a 9.5 mpg improvement <strong>in</strong><br />

fuel economy for hybrid vehicles slow<strong>in</strong>g from 70 to 55 mph, compared to just 6.1 mpg for<br />

comparable conventional gasol<strong>in</strong>e vehicles. The higher basel<strong>in</strong>e fuel economy makes total<br />

fuel consumption impacts lower <strong>in</strong> absolute terms, however. A European study found<br />

that GHG emissions from modern vehicles tend to show much less dependence on vehicle<br />

speeds (at least at highway speeds) compared with older vehicles (Carsten et al., 2008).<br />

4-38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!