09.02.2013 Views

translation studies. retrospective and prospective views

translation studies. retrospective and prospective views

translation studies. retrospective and prospective views

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

If only implied in The Magus, this constant refusal to take up the<br />

position of the omniscient narrator is directly referred to in The French<br />

Lieutenant’s Woman:<br />

The novelist is still a god, since he creates (<strong>and</strong> not even the most<br />

aleatory avant-garde novel has managed to extirpate its author<br />

completely); what has changed is that we are no longer the gods of the<br />

Victorian image, omniscient <strong>and</strong> decreeing; but in the new theological<br />

image, with freedom our first principle, not authority. (Fowles in<br />

Praisler, 2005: 152)<br />

In The Magus, Conchis may be seen as the embodiment of the<br />

omniscient narrator, whereas omniscience is metaphorically rendered <strong>and</strong><br />

constantly brought under scrutiny in the form of the godgame played at<br />

Bourani. Conchis says many times that “the masque is a metaphor” meant<br />

to educate Nicholas (to see the artificiality of the roles he plays) <strong>and</strong> the<br />

reader to see the inner workings of omniscience <strong>and</strong> its artificiality, its<br />

(dis)illusions. “The role of Conchis, <strong>and</strong> of God, for Fowles is like that of<br />

the novelist vis-à-vis his fiction.” (Foster, 1994: 39)<br />

Conchis is a god-like type of narrator who manipulates his characters<br />

<strong>and</strong> this seems to become clear enough from what his ‘actors’ (st<strong>and</strong>ing in<br />

fact for the ‘characters’) say about him. Julie will tell Nicholas that:<br />

“Everything we say, he hears. He knows.” (196) […] There is a sense in<br />

which he perhaps can hear everything we say. […] Nothing to do with<br />

telepathy. That’s just a blind. A metaphor.” (213) Conchis himself<br />

emphasises the fact that Lily, as a character in the story he narrates,<br />

“…always does exactly what I want.” (170) His ability to hear <strong>and</strong> know<br />

everything without being in their presence may be interpreted as a<br />

reference to the omniscient narrator’s ability to be in several places at once<br />

<strong>and</strong> know everything about his/her characters, even their innermost<br />

thoughts <strong>and</strong> feelings.<br />

Nicholas, in his turn, says “I feel I’m some sort of guinea-pig, God<br />

knows why.” (218) <strong>and</strong> later, during the same conversation with Julie/Lily:<br />

“You must have seen you’re in the h<strong>and</strong>s of someone who’s very skilled at<br />

rearranging reality.” (219) He thinks that “Conchis was trying to recreate<br />

some lost world of his own <strong>and</strong> for some reason I was cast as the jeune<br />

premier in it, his younger self. […]; now I uneasily felt myself being<br />

manoeuvred into a butt.” (192) Nicholas is very angry with Conchis<br />

because he has the power to create <strong>and</strong> then make disappear at will the<br />

world he creates: “I walked back through the darkness, feeling depressed,<br />

<strong>and</strong> increasingly furious that Conchis could spirit his world away; deprive<br />

me of it, like a callous drug-ward doctor with some hooked addict.” (243)<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!