translation studies. retrospective and prospective views
translation studies. retrospective and prospective views
translation studies. retrospective and prospective views
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Katherine Tarbox, in her turn, states that:<br />
The author refuses to collect his readers. He desires in his fiction to<br />
allow the reader the same psychoanalytic, reconstructive experience<br />
as the protagonist, with its attendant, sometimes uneasy freedoms.<br />
(1988: 9)<br />
Through his unusual technical strategies Fowles shows in each novel<br />
how limited our seeing is in everyday life, how time bound <strong>and</strong><br />
tradition bound we are, how accustomed we are to looking at the<br />
world with collector-consciousness […]. (1988: 8)<br />
The story Fowles tells all readers in his novels is that of individual<br />
freedom. His main preoccupation seems to be that of making us all<br />
underst<strong>and</strong> what an important role fiction plays in achieving this<br />
individual freedom. In his interview with Katherine Tarbox, Fowles<br />
pointed out:<br />
Life does condition us so frightfully, that it’s terribly difficult to sense<br />
… the underlying nature of existence. You know, we are caged more<br />
<strong>and</strong> more by present society in roles, <strong>and</strong> I think being able to see<br />
through the roles is most important…. Most people like to be<br />
conditioned; unfortunately, it’s a fallacy that everybody wants to be<br />
freer in the sense we’re talking about. They’re much happier I think,<br />
having fixed routines <strong>and</strong> a limited way of life. (in Tarbox, 1988: 8)<br />
Fowles believes in the power of fiction to awake us from this<br />
“existential torpor” <strong>and</strong> in “his extravagant metaphor of the godgame,” he<br />
implies that “fiction itself is the great awakener, the great teacher. […]<br />
Fiction is the great existential adventure.” (Tarbox, 1988: 8)<br />
Thomas C. Foster considers The Magus an “allegory of the act of<br />
reading” <strong>and</strong> we would like to add to his statement our own interpretation.<br />
Bearing in mind that, in John Fowles’s conception, reading equates with<br />
self-knowledge, we think this is one of the reasons why the labyrinth,<br />
symbolic of initiation <strong>and</strong> self-knowledge, is so often referred to in the<br />
book. Thus, The Magus may also be seen as an allegory of the quest of the<br />
self. Entering the labyrinth of John Fowles’s (meta)fiction, as uncomfortable<br />
as it may seem at a first glance, proves in the end stimulating <strong>and</strong><br />
gratifying since our search will have made us achieve a better<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ing of our true self <strong>and</strong> of the world.<br />
55