18.01.2013 Views

Hrvatski filmski ljetopis, broj 56 (2008) - Hrvatski filmski savez

Hrvatski filmski ljetopis, broj 56 (2008) - Hrvatski filmski savez

Hrvatski filmski ljetopis, broj 56 (2008) - Hrvatski filmski savez

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

hfl_<strong>56</strong>-q6.qxp <strong>2008</strong>-12-18 15:22 Page 173<br />

Hrvat. film. ljeto, Zagreb / god 14 (<strong>2008</strong>), br. <strong>56</strong>, str. 167 do 174 Sa`eci / Summaries<br />

dio europskoga i svjetskoga filmskog i kulturnog naslije|a. Bez takvog polazi{ta<br />

u razmatranju problema vrednovanja filmskoga gradiva nemogu}e je<br />

utvrditi vrijednost pojedinog djela ili ve}ih cjelina i to sa stajali{ta pojedinoga<br />

filmskog roda, vrste, autorskog opusa i sli~no. Takav pristup u vrednovanju<br />

filmskoga gradiva nu`an je posebno u radu filmskog arhiva jer je on<br />

precizan i svrhovit i zbog stalne potrebe prosu|ivanja Nacionalne filmske<br />

zbirke radi provo|enja primjerenih mjera za{tite: restauracije, rekonstrukcije<br />

te izradbe zamjenskog izvornog filmskoga gradiva, {to je temeljna zada-<br />

}a svakog nacionalnog filmskog arhiva.<br />

Tatjana Rezec Stibilj<br />

^etrdeset godina Slovenskoga filmskog<br />

arhiva pri Arhivu Republike Slovenije<br />

UDK: 791.53:930.25(497.4)<br />

Povijesni pregled rada i temeljnih djelatnosti Slovenskoga filmskog arhiva,<br />

koji ove godine obilje`ava 40 godina osnutka. Na prostoru biv{e Jugoslavije<br />

nakon 1945. godine isprva je osnovana Jugoslovenska kinoteka u Beogradu,<br />

koja je od 1957. do 1971. imala status <strong>savez</strong>ne ustanove gdje su filmsku<br />

produkciju ~uvala republi~ka filmska poduze}a, pa tako i slovenski Triglav<br />

film. Godine 1968. pri Arhivu Socijalisti~ke Republike Slovenije osnovan<br />

je odjel Slovenski <strong>filmski</strong> arhiv (u nastavku SFA), specijaliziran za evidentiranje,<br />

skupljanje, odr`avanje i ~uvanje slovenskog filmskog naslije|a.<br />

SNIMATELJSKI PRILOZI<br />

Enes Mid`i}<br />

Mit o prvoj vo`nji kamere i snimci s<br />

mleta~ke gondole<br />

UDK: 778.53(091)<br />

Podatak da je Promio 1896. godine u Veneciji snimio Canal Grande kamerom<br />

iz gondole u vo`nji znat }e spomenuti svaki povjesni~ar filma. No, niti<br />

je prvu filmsku vo`nju izveo Promio, a sasvim je neuvjerljivo da je ta vo`nja<br />

kamere izvedena gondolom. Za prvu je tvrdnju dovoljno prelistati precizne<br />

onodobne ili pak danas a`urirane i sistematizirane kataloge tvrtke Lumière<br />

ili onodobne novinske napise iz Lyona, koji spominju filmske vo`nje datirane<br />

prije Promiove (film koji predstavlja prvu poznatu snimku kamerom u<br />

vo`nji je Panorama pris d'un bateau, kat. br. 130, snimljen 21. rujna 1896.<br />

u Kölnu s parobroda na Rajni). Dokazom druge tvrdnje detaljno se bavi<br />

ovaj tekst, analiziraju}i sa snimateljskog i vizualnog stajali{ta Promiovu<br />

snimku, dokazuju}i (pogotovo s obzirom na visinu pogleda i snimljene<br />

objekte u prolazu, a uzimaju}i u obzir visinu vaporetta i gondole) da je<br />

snimka ura|ena s vaporetta, {to uostalom sugerira i izvorni naslov filma iz<br />

kataloga tvrtke Lumière — Panorama du Grand Canal pris d'un bateau (kat.<br />

br. 295).<br />

Kre{imir Miki}<br />

Portret snimatelja — Robby Müller<br />

UDK: 778.53-051Müller, R.<br />

Prvi iz serije Portreti snimatelja u kojoj }e se obra|ivati neke od najzna~ajnijih<br />

svjetskih snimatelja autor zapo~inje portretom Robyja Müllera, nagla-<br />

{avaju}i njegovu suradnju s redateljima (stil bez stila), pristup kadriranju,<br />

kompoziciji kadra, pokretima kamere, odabiru objektiva, osvjetljenju i drugim<br />

snimateljskim izra`ajnim sredstvima. Posebice se zadr`ava na filmovima<br />

koje je Müller snimio za Wendersa i to onima u crnobijeloj tehnici (primjerice<br />

Tijekom vremena), ali se osvr}e i an filmove Down by Law (J. Jarmusch,<br />

1986) i Korczak (A. Wajda, 1990). Najopse`nije ukazuje na Mrtav<br />

~ovjek (1995) ulaze}i u ra{~lambi na mogu}e specifi~nosti fotografije u Jarmuschevu<br />

filmu poveznice fotografije i filma, mogu}e utjecaje fotografa na<br />

snimatelje. Pritom ukazuje na sli~nosti mjesta doga|anja i motive, ali ujedno<br />

i na stati~nost fotografske snimke za razliku od kadra koji je uvijek dio<br />

monta`nog slijeda. U zaklju~ku autor nagla{ava kako Müllerovo stvarala{-<br />

archival material. Many anthological works of Croatian cinematography<br />

are a cultural good of the highest value; at the same time, Croatian film<br />

heritage is an integral part of European and world film and cultural heritage.<br />

Without such a starting point in considering the problem of film<br />

material evaluation, it would be impossible to determine the value of an<br />

individual piece of art or larger wholes, especially from the standpoint of a<br />

particular film genre, type, author's opus and the like. Such an approach to<br />

film material evaluation is necessary especially in the work of film archives<br />

because it is precise and purposeful. It is an approach required also due to<br />

the permanent need of evaluating the National Film Collection with the<br />

aim of taking adequate protective measures, such as restoration, reconstruction<br />

and the creation of reserve original film materials, which is the<br />

basic task of any national film archive.<br />

Tatjana Rezec Stibilj<br />

Forty years of the Slovene Film Archives<br />

UDK: 791.53:930.25(497.4)<br />

A historical overview of the work and basic activities of the Slovene Film<br />

Archive, which celebrates 40 years of existence. After 1945, in former<br />

Yugoslavia there was first formed a Yugoslav Cinemateque in Belgrade,<br />

which from 1957 to 1971 had the status of a federal institution where all<br />

republican film companies, including the Slovene Triglav film, kept their<br />

film production. In 1968, a department was formed within the Archives of<br />

the Socialist Republic of Slovenia: the Slovene Film Archives (SFA), which<br />

specialised in recording, collecting, maintenance and safeguarding of<br />

Slovene film heritage.<br />

STUDIES IN CINEMATOGRAPHY<br />

Enes Mid`i}<br />

The Myth on the first moving camera<br />

and the shot from a Venetian gondola<br />

UDK: 778.53(091)<br />

That in 1896 Alexandre Promio filmed the Canal Grande in Venice from a<br />

moving gondola is a piece of information every film historian is bound to<br />

know. However, the first moving camera was not an act of Promio and it is<br />

hard to believe that the camera movement device was a gondola. To substantiate<br />

the first statement, all one needs to do is flick through the precise<br />

Lumière catalogues of the time or the updated and systemised ones of<br />

today, or the Lyon newspaper articles of the time that mention moving<br />

camera shots on dates earlier than Promio's (a film representing the first<br />

known moving camera shot is Panorama pris d'un bateau, cat. no. 130, shot<br />

on 21st September 1896 in Cologne from a steamship on the river Rhine).<br />

The second statement is at the centre of this text, as it provides a camera<br />

and visual analysis of Promio's recording, proving (especially with regard to<br />

the height of the view and objects filmed on the way, and taking into consideration<br />

the height of the vaporetto and gondola) that the shot was filmed<br />

from a vaporetto, a point suggested by the original title of the film from the<br />

Lumière company catalogue — Panorama du Grand Canal pris d'un bateau<br />

(cat. no. 295).<br />

Kre{imir Miki}<br />

Portrait of a cinematographer Robby<br />

Müller<br />

UDK: 778.53-051Müller, R.<br />

The author announces a series of texts entitled Portraits of Cinematographers<br />

that shall tackle some of the most prominent world cinematographers.<br />

The series of articles begins with a portrait of Robby Müller, placing<br />

an emphasis on his cooperation with film directors (style without style),<br />

his approach to framing, frame composition, camera movements, choice of<br />

lenses, lighting and other means of expression of a camera. The author<br />

specifically tackles films in which Müller worked with Wenders, the black<br />

and white films (for example Kings of the Road), but he also tackles the<br />

films Down by Law (J. Jarmusch, 1986) and Korczak (A. Wajda, 1990). He<br />

elaborates on the particularity of cinematography in Jarmusch's Dead Man<br />

(1995) indicating possible links between photography and film, influence<br />

173<br />

H R V A T S K I F I L M S K I L J E T O P I S <strong>56</strong>/<strong>2008</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!