25.11.2014 Views

Miljø- og samfundsøkonomisk vurdering af ... - Miljøstyrelsen

Miljø- og samfundsøkonomisk vurdering af ... - Miljøstyrelsen

Miljø- og samfundsøkonomisk vurdering af ... - Miljøstyrelsen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Environmental savings per ton of recycled material are highest for aluminum in all the<br />

environmental impact categories except from photochemical sm<strong>og</strong>. Iron, paper and plastics also<br />

contribute to significant savings per tonnes of recycled material, especially for global warming. The<br />

treatment of organic household waste in manure-based AD facilities or waste incineration plants<br />

results in approximately the same numbers as for global warming. For nutrient enrichment,<br />

however, incineration is better (see also footnote 6). For the recyclable waste fractions, that could be<br />

used for energy production in waste incineration plants (especially for CO2-neutral fuels such as<br />

paper and cardboard), the potential environmental savings from incineration of the different waste<br />

fractions are not explicitly shown in the report, as the scenarios are not designed to compare<br />

recycling and energy recovery for specific individual waste fractions.<br />

Toksiske kategorier<br />

20<br />

Humantoksicitet via luft Humantoksicitet via jord Humantoksicitet via vand Økotoksicitet i vand Økotoksicitet i jord<br />

0<br />

-20<br />

mPE / ton dagrenovation<br />

-40<br />

-60<br />

-80<br />

-100<br />

-120<br />

-140<br />

-160<br />

1 2A 2F 2Z 3A 3F 3Z 4 5A 5F 6A 6F 7<br />

Figure C<br />

Potential toxic environmental impacts of the 13 scenarios for one mixed catchment area.<br />

All scenarios show small resource savings for each of the resources coal, natural gas and oil, iron,<br />

aluminum and phosphorus corresponding to 0 mill. to 11 mill. person reserves / ton household<br />

waste. 19<br />

Resource savings of phosphorus from the application of anaerobic digested, source separated<br />

organic household waste is approx. 0.35 kg phosphorus / ton household waste corresponding to<br />

approx. 650 tonnes phosphorus/year for Denmark (out of a total of approx. 1,050 tonnes of<br />

phosphorus in the total volume of organic household waste).<br />

Economic Assessment<br />

The socio-economic assessment includes costs of collection (bag consumption, capital for and<br />

maintenance of bins, collection and transport, and information), operation and capital costs for<br />

facilities for central sorting, anaerobic digestion and waste incineration, income from the sale of<br />

energy (equivalent to the avoided energy production from i.e. coal), dry materials and<br />

digestate/compost, environmental costs of national and international air emissions (valuation<br />

projected for 2020), as well as tax distortion loss from financing renevue effect. A green field project<br />

is applied including all costs of establishing a treatment plant. The investments are depreciated over<br />

a 8-25 years period depending on the type of installation.<br />

19<br />

Person reserve determines the amount of a given resource available globally for an average person and its<br />

descendants.<br />

26 Miljø- <strong>og</strong> samfundsøkonomisk <strong>vurdering</strong> <strong>af</strong> muligheder for øget genanvendelse <strong>af</strong> papir, pap, plast, metal <strong>og</strong> organisk <strong>af</strong>fald fra<br />

dagrenovation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!