20.03.2013 Views

Assessing Student's Needs for Assistive Technology (ASNAT)

Assessing Student's Needs for Assistive Technology (ASNAT)

Assessing Student's Needs for Assistive Technology (ASNAT)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 1 - <strong>Assistive</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Assessment<br />

Considering the Need <strong>for</strong> <strong>Assistive</strong> <strong>Technology</strong><br />

Every IEP Team is now required to “consider” the child’s need <strong>for</strong> assistive technology. When you do<br />

“consider” assistive technology, that process should involve some discussion and examination of<br />

potential assistive technology. It should not be ignored or skipped over. It should not be someone<br />

saying, “<strong>Assistive</strong> technology? No, he doesn’t need that.” with no real discussion. Consideration is<br />

defined in the American Heritage Dictionary as “to think carefully about, to <strong>for</strong>m an opinion about, or to<br />

look at thoughtfully.” We believe that Congress did not choose that word by accident, but clearly<br />

intended that there would be some thought about whether assistive technology may be needed by this<br />

child.<br />

This “thoughtful look” should certainly include at least a brief discussion of which assistive technology<br />

might be useful and whether it is needed. In order to do that, someone on the IEP team will need to be<br />

sufficiently knowledgeable about assistive technology to help lead the discussion. That person may<br />

bring along specific resource in<strong>for</strong>mation about assistive technology to help all team members focus on<br />

what assistive technology exists <strong>for</strong> the tasks that are challenging to the student. That in<strong>for</strong>mation might<br />

be books, catalogs, printouts from a website, or actual hardware or software to see. Whether resources<br />

are brought along or not, there should be a brief discussion of assistive technology during which at least<br />

one person displays some knowledge about relevant assistive technology.<br />

Because this discussion should be brief, it should last at least a minute or two, but no more than 15 to 20<br />

minutes. Congress intended that we could do this within the confines of an IEP meeting, so it should not<br />

add appreciably to the length of that meeting. If understanding and agreement cannot be reached in<br />

twenty minutes, then it is possible that there are questions that need to be addressed in another <strong>for</strong>um<br />

such as an assistive technology evaluation.<br />

In addition to talking about the assistive technology itself, there should be a discussion about assistive<br />

technology services. School districts are required to provide both the devices and the services, and the<br />

“consideration” requirement also includes assistive technology services. Specific assistive technology<br />

services may include: an evaluation of the student’s need <strong>for</strong> assistive technology; training of the<br />

student, members of the family or staff on how to use the assistive technology; technical assistance<br />

about its operation or use; modification or customization of the assistive technology; and other supports<br />

to the school personnel that might be necessary <strong>for</strong> the assistive technology to be appropriately used.<br />

What these other supports might be is not specified in the law. It could include anything that is needed,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, training on how to add new vocabulary to an augmentative communication device or scan<br />

new materials into a software program that reads the text, or time <strong>for</strong> planning about how and when<br />

these things will happen and who is responsible.<br />

<strong>Assessing</strong> Students’ <strong>Needs</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Assistive</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> (2004) 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!