19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

differentiated whole. Words <strong>of</strong> this kind that<br />

have a singular form are usually followed by a<br />

singular verb. Words <strong>of</strong> this kind that have a<br />

plural form are usually followed by a plural<br />

verb but are treated in other respects as singulars.<br />

See mass nouns.<br />

The difference between these three classes <strong>of</strong><br />

words is not always clear. Mass nouns are used<br />

generically more <strong>of</strong>ten than not and some generic<br />

singulars are indistinguishable from group<br />

names. For this reason, many grammarians use<br />

the term collective noun to mean all. three<br />

classes. Many others limit the term to what is<br />

called in this dictionary group names.<br />

Some grammarians include as collectives the<br />

name <strong>of</strong> any whole made up <strong>of</strong> similar parts,<br />

such as chain, library, forest. This is a philosophical<br />

distinction, not a grammatical one.<br />

Words <strong>of</strong> this kind have no grammatical peculiarities<br />

and nothing is gained by putting them in<br />

a special class. Some grammarians also list as<br />

collectives any noun that has the same form in<br />

the singular and the plural, such as deer and<br />

grouse. But words <strong>of</strong> this kind are true singulars<br />

and true plurals. They have no peculiarities beyond<br />

the fact that the plural is formed irregularly.<br />

In this book a word like deer is considered<br />

as two forms, one singular and one plural,, which<br />

happen to be alike.<br />

college. See university.<br />

colloquialisms. Colloquial English does not mean<br />

English that is not standard. It means the iaccepted<br />

spoken idiom, in contrast to a formal, literary<br />

idiom. A grammar published in 1930 lists do<br />

you have swordfish? as a colloquial construction;<br />

the literary form is given as have you swordfish?<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> the best contemporary writers and<br />

public speakers use colloquial English by preference.<br />

They avoid literary forms that could not<br />

be used in conversation.<br />

It used to be said that colloquial English was<br />

like a good business suit and literary English<br />

like formal dress. The analogy still holds. But<br />

one should remember that times have changed,<br />

that a good business suit is seldom out <strong>of</strong> place,<br />

and that formal dress, where it is not requiredat<br />

a picnic, for example-may be ridiculous.<br />

collusion; connivance. Collusion is secret agreement<br />

for fraudulent purpose. It is sometimes<br />

confused with collaboration but men act in collaboration<br />

for good ends, in collusion for bad<br />

(The fudge said that the witnesses were in collusion<br />

and dismissed the case).<br />

Connivance implies winking at wrongdoing,<br />

assenting to it guiltily, although without taking<br />

any active part in it. The word derives from a<br />

Latin word meaning to shut the eyes. M:en are<br />

in collusion. They connive at it.<br />

colon. The colon is used almost exclusively for<br />

formal writing. Its main function is to call attention<br />

to what follows. It is used:<br />

1. To introduce ideas in a series after an introductory<br />

phrase, as in these are the main exports:<br />

metals, primarily iron, copper and tin;<br />

grains, primarily wheat; and cotton.<br />

2. To introduce formally any subject, as in<br />

Mr. Brown moved that the following question<br />

be referred to the Committee: What are the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> zoning laws on downtown building<br />

activity?<br />

3. To introduce a quotation <strong>of</strong> a full sentence<br />

or more, as in in his previous book the author<br />

stated: (Quotation follows).<br />

4. Between clauses when the second summarizes<br />

or restates the first, as in in spite <strong>of</strong> the<br />

politicians, it is the people who will finally decide<br />

the issue: they have always been the deciding<br />

factor ultimately.<br />

5. After the salutation in a formal letter, as<br />

in Dear Sir: (In some European countries an<br />

exclamation point is used after the salutation in<br />

a formal letter, and a c0mm.a in informal<br />

letters.)<br />

6. In formal bibliographies, between author<br />

and title, between place <strong>of</strong> publication and publisher,<br />

and between volume and page, as in<br />

Keynes, John Maynard: A Treatise on Probability.<br />

London: Macmillan and Co., 1921 and<br />

Foreign Affairs 32:353.<br />

7. To show clock time, as in 4:30 p.m.<br />

8. To show proportions, as in The paint<br />

should be mixed 1:4.<br />

Either a capital letter or a lower-case letter<br />

may be used after a colon. If a full sentence follows<br />

the colon, it generally starts with a capital,<br />

as in The following result was reported: Unanimous<br />

agreement was reached by the Council<br />

after a very short discussion period. But we<br />

write the result: unanimous agreement.<br />

When a colon follows an abbreviation there<br />

is no period before the colon, as in he took the<br />

following courses while studying for his M.A:<br />

history, psychology, anthropology. . . .<br />

A dash should not be used after a colon. In<br />

informal writing the dash can <strong>of</strong>ten take the<br />

place <strong>of</strong> the colon, but the two are no longer<br />

used together.<br />

colored. As a euphemism for Negro, colored sometimes<br />

has an element <strong>of</strong> condescension. It is not<br />

usually intended to be an <strong>of</strong>fensive word, for it<br />

carries a plain intention <strong>of</strong> politeness.<br />

In the Union <strong>of</strong> South Africa colored is the<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial description <strong>of</strong> the man with mixed blood.<br />

No Bantu is there ever called colored; no man<br />

with a dark skin, not a full-blooded Negro, is<br />

there ever called a Negro-as he would be in<br />

the United States. The white South Africans<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten use colored as a noun, referring to a Colored.<br />

This is resented by the educated among<br />

those so referred to, though they do not feel so<br />

strongly when the word is used as an adjective.<br />

See African, Creole, mulatto, Negro.<br />

colossal. That is properly colossal which is like a<br />

colossus-<strong>of</strong> vast size, gigantic, huge, enormous<br />

(He was a man <strong>of</strong> colossal stature. Wagner’s<br />

colossal dramas).<br />

As a mere intensive, however, (a colossal<br />

liar) with a suggestion <strong>of</strong> the amusing or absurd<br />

(He was a colossal idiot) the word is not standard,<br />

being a catchword picked up from the<br />

Germans among whom, in the nineteen twenties<br />

and thirties, kolossal superseded almost every<br />

other adjective <strong>of</strong> admiration and wonder.<br />

colossns. The plural is colossuses or colossi.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!