19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in a mnn that 2 respect, or a contact clause<br />

containing no relative is used, as in a man I<br />

respect. Neither that nor a contact clause can<br />

be used after a proper name. Here whom is<br />

preferred to who when the word is the object<br />

<strong>of</strong> the verb; but who is also acceptable, as in<br />

Fanny, who I hope you will see soon.<br />

whoever; whomever. Whoever is an indefinite<br />

pronoun and may be used as a singular or a<br />

plural. It can be thought <strong>of</strong> as a combined<br />

personal pronoun and relative pronoun, such as<br />

he who or they who, and is used in statements<br />

about everyone who fits the description that<br />

follows, as whoever comes, whoever likes me.<br />

It is not an interrogative and should not be<br />

used where no description can be given, as in<br />

whoever do you mean? and I can’t imagine<br />

whoever you are thinking <strong>of</strong>. Sentences <strong>of</strong> this<br />

kind are not standard and nothing is saved by<br />

writing whoever as two words, as in who ever<br />

do you mean? However, a question such as who<br />

ever heard <strong>of</strong> that? is entirely different. Here<br />

ever is an adverb attached to heard, and is<br />

above reproach.<br />

The form whoever is required whenever the<br />

word is the subject <strong>of</strong> a verb, as in whoever<br />

told you that is mistaken. It is also acceptable<br />

as the object <strong>of</strong> a verb or preposition, as in<br />

ask whoever you see and ask whoever you speak<br />

to. The form whomever is not required but may<br />

be used when the word is the object <strong>of</strong> the verb<br />

or <strong>of</strong> a preposition in the subordinate, descriptive<br />

clause. It should not be used when the word<br />

is the subject <strong>of</strong> the subordinate verb. For<br />

example, whoever is required and whomever<br />

would be a mistake in he iells whoever comes<br />

along and he was angry with whoever opposed<br />

him, because the form <strong>of</strong> the word is determined<br />

by the fact that it is the subject <strong>of</strong> the<br />

following verb, comes or opposed, and not by<br />

the fact that it is the object <strong>of</strong> a preceding verb,<br />

tells, or a preceding preposition, with. Whomever<br />

is an extremely literary word and should<br />

not be used unless it is used in the literary<br />

manner.<br />

Whoever (and whomever) came into general<br />

use a little more than three hundred years ago.<br />

The King James Bible uses an older form whosoever,<br />

which is now archaic. A still older form,<br />

whosomever, was archaic in 1600 and does not<br />

appear in Biblical English, but it is still heard<br />

in rural areas in the United States.<br />

In current English the possessive form <strong>of</strong><br />

whoever is whoever’s, as in whoever’s dog it is.<br />

But an older form, whosever, is also used, especially<br />

when no noun follows, as in whosever<br />

it is. Since whosoever is a purely literary word,<br />

it has only the old possessive form whosesoever.<br />

whole. See complete.<br />

whorl. See whirl.<br />

whose is a possessive pronoun. When used as tho<br />

possessive form <strong>of</strong> an interrogative pronoun, it<br />

refers only to persons, as in whose it is? When<br />

used as the possessive form <strong>of</strong> a relative pronoun,<br />

it may refer to things as well as to<br />

557 Wild<br />

persons or animals, as in a land whose stones<br />

are iron and out <strong>of</strong> whose hills thou mayesf dig<br />

brass. A country whose rainfall is abundant is<br />

better English than a country, the rainfall <strong>of</strong><br />

which is abundant.<br />

The form who’s is a contraction <strong>of</strong> who is<br />

and should not be used in place <strong>of</strong> the possessive<br />

pronoun whose.<br />

why. This word may be used at the beginnlng <strong>of</strong><br />

a sentence to show surprise, as in Why! This &<br />

a pleasure! It may be used anywhere in a<br />

sentence so long as it means “the reason” or<br />

“for what reason,” as in I know why he didn’t<br />

stay.<br />

The word reason is <strong>of</strong>ten followed by the<br />

word why, as in I know the reason why he<br />

didn’t stay. This use <strong>of</strong> why is sometimes condemned<br />

as redundant or pleonastic, but the<br />

phrase the reason why is a standard English<br />

idiom, and has been for many centuries. Anyone<br />

who wants to can always omit words that<br />

are not strictly necessary to his meaning, but<br />

if this is done consistently the result ia a stiff,<br />

unnatural English. As a rule, it is better to be<br />

natural than to be correct according to theories<br />

that other people have never heard <strong>of</strong>. (For<br />

the reason is because, see because.)<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> why in the middle <strong>of</strong> a sentence,<br />

as a loose connective with no reference at all<br />

to a reason, does not have the same standing.<br />

Sentences such as when I got there, why she<br />

was waiting for me are heard only in careless or<br />

uneducated speech.<br />

wide. See broad.<br />

-wide. See soilixes.<br />

wide awake; wide-awake; wideawake. Wide awake<br />

means fully awake, alert, keenly conscious and<br />

aware. In England wideawake and wide-awake<br />

may be used as adjectives meaning fully awake,<br />

with the eyes wide open (He gave him a wideawake<br />

stare); alert, keen, or knowing (only a<br />

wide-awake young man can fill the position).<br />

As nouns, wideawake and wide-awake were<br />

used formerly to describe a s<strong>of</strong>t, low-crowned<br />

felt hat. In the United States only wide-awake<br />

is now used as an adjective, though wideawake<br />

(especially in reference to the hat) once was.<br />

wideness, width. See breadth.<br />

wide open spaces. Used seriously in reference to<br />

the unsettled sections <strong>of</strong> the country, particularly<br />

the western desert and semi-desert, Ihe<br />

wide open spaces is a clichC. Used facetiously,<br />

it is a bore.<br />

wife. The plural is wives.<br />

The expression an old wives’ tale contains an<br />

old form <strong>of</strong> the genitive and is equivalent to<br />

an old wife’s tale. This is not an instance <strong>of</strong> a<br />

plural noun used as the first element in a compound.<br />

And wife’s here means “woman’s” not<br />

necessarily “married wornan’s.”<br />

wild horses could not drag it from me. As a hyperbolic<br />

affirmation <strong>of</strong> secrecy, the assurance that<br />

wild horses couldn’t drag it from me is a clich&<br />

The reference is to a form <strong>of</strong> torture and<br />

punishment in which each arm and each leg <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!