19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

from diagnosis). It is interesting that among<br />

such formations whose irregularity would, he<br />

felt, be too obvious for anyone to make serious<br />

use <strong>of</strong> them, Fowler lists donate, now a fully<br />

accepted word.<br />

back <strong>of</strong>; in back <strong>of</strong>. Both <strong>of</strong> these phrases are<br />

standard English in the United States. A survey<br />

<strong>of</strong> American usage made about twenty-five years<br />

ago found that back <strong>of</strong> was thoroughly established<br />

but that in back <strong>of</strong> was “disputable.” Since<br />

then, in back <strong>of</strong> has been accepted in the finest<br />

circles. It appears in foreign-language dictionaries<br />

and vocabulary lists compiled by the most<br />

reputable institutions, and in publications <strong>of</strong> the<br />

United States Office <strong>of</strong> Education. (No one any<br />

longer questions the propriety <strong>of</strong> in front <strong>of</strong>.)<br />

backward; backwards. Backward is the only form<br />

that can be used to qualify a following noun, as<br />

in u backward glance. Either form may be used<br />

in any other construction, as in move backwards<br />

and move backward. In the United States the<br />

form backward is generally preferred.<br />

Bacon, the essayist, may be called Francis Bacon,<br />

Sir Francis Bacon, Baron Verulam <strong>of</strong> Verulam,<br />

Lord Verulam, Viscount St. Albans, or Lord<br />

St. Albans. Few men have had as many legitimate<br />

names. It is an error, however, to call him<br />

Lord Bacon.<br />

bacteria is a plural form and traditionally requires<br />

a plural verb.<br />

In general English bacteria is treated as a<br />

plural when it refers to a collection <strong>of</strong> individuals,<br />

as in these bacteria are dead and all bacteria<br />

are larger than viruses. But when it refers to a<br />

class or a variety, it may also be treated as a<br />

singular, as in this particular bacteria is harmless<br />

and a new bucteria has appeared. In this sense,<br />

a regular plural in s is sometimes heard, as in<br />

not enough is known aboat the bacterias. This is<br />

acceptable. But a double Latin plural, bacteriue,<br />

is not.<br />

The Latin singular bacterium is very rare. It<br />

is not heard in general English and is now too<br />

vague a term to be used in the laboratory. A<br />

technician who had isolated one <strong>of</strong> these organisms<br />

would call what he had found something<br />

more specific than a bacterium. The word occurs<br />

chiefly when this form <strong>of</strong> life is being discussed<br />

in connection with a virus.<br />

bad. The comparative form is worse. The superlative<br />

form is worst. At one time bad also had the<br />

forms budder and baddest, but these are no<br />

longer standard.<br />

A few generations ago, the word bud was an<br />

adjective and could only be used to qualify a<br />

noun; the word badly was an adverb and was<br />

the form required to qualify any word that was<br />

not a noun. This means that the form bud was<br />

required in sentences such as I felt bud, he<br />

looked bud, and so on, where it refers to, or<br />

qualifies, the subject <strong>of</strong> the verb. On the other<br />

hand, the form badly was required in sentences<br />

such as it hurt badly, because here the word<br />

refers to or qualifies the verb, that is, it tells how<br />

it hurt.<br />

51 baggage<br />

But today many people believe that I felt<br />

badly is a “nicer” expression than I felt bud.<br />

This technically incorrect form has now become<br />

acceptable English. We may say Z felt bad or<br />

Z felt badly. Having established itself after the<br />

verb feel, badly has begun to appear after other<br />

linking verbs, such as he looks badly, it smells<br />

badly, where bud is the traditionally correct<br />

form. Badly is not yet as well established after<br />

these other verbs as it is after feel. It sounds<br />

like a grammatical mistake to many people. But<br />

it is acceptable to many others and will probably<br />

be thoroughly established in time.<br />

As badly took over some <strong>of</strong> the functions <strong>of</strong><br />

bud, the form bad began to be used in place <strong>of</strong><br />

badly, as in it hnrt bud. This construction, once<br />

standard English, had been obsolete for several<br />

centuries when this revival began. Many people<br />

still object to this use <strong>of</strong> bad but it has not been<br />

attacked as energetically as the adjective use <strong>of</strong><br />

badly and will probably be standard English in<br />

time.<br />

Worse and less are the only comparative<br />

forms in English that do not end in r, and less<br />

now has the duplicate form lesser. The word<br />

worser, as in the worser sort, my worser self,<br />

was formerly as acceptable as lesser now is, but<br />

at present it is out <strong>of</strong> use and considered unacceptable<br />

by many people. The words worse and<br />

worst are both adverbs as well as adjectives.<br />

Only the form worst can be used before <strong>of</strong>,<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> how many things are being talked<br />

about, as in in the collision between the convertible<br />

and the truck, the convertible got the worst<br />

<strong>of</strong> it. Worse <strong>of</strong> is unidiomatic English, and the<br />

fact that only two objects are being compared is<br />

irrelevant.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> worst for most, as in what I need<br />

worst is money, is objectionable to most people.<br />

bad blood between tbem. To say <strong>of</strong> those who<br />

have long nursed grudges against each other,<br />

who have an ingrained dislike and resentment<br />

<strong>of</strong> each other, that there is bud blood between<br />

them is to employ an anemic cliche.<br />

bade. See bid.<br />

bag and baggage. Baggage has a specialized meaning,<br />

the impedimenta <strong>of</strong> an army. With bag and<br />

baggage-with the property <strong>of</strong> the army as a<br />

whole and the properties <strong>of</strong> the individual soldiers-was<br />

sometimes one <strong>of</strong> the terms <strong>of</strong> an<br />

honorable retreat.<br />

The phrase, meaning “with one’s whole belongings,<br />

completely,” probably remained in<br />

popular use because <strong>of</strong> its alliteration. It is now<br />

a cliche with all <strong>of</strong> its original meaning lost and<br />

should be avoided in ordinary speech or writing.<br />

baggage; luggage. Baggage used to be the American<br />

word, luggage the English. But in recent<br />

years luggage has come into currency in America<br />

too. Airplanes and trains have luggage racks<br />

and what used to be called the trunk <strong>of</strong> an automobile<br />

is now <strong>of</strong>ten called the luggage compartment.<br />

In almost all combinations, however, it remains<br />

baggage: baggage room, baggage agent,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!