A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
from diagnosis). It is interesting that among<br />
such formations whose irregularity would, he<br />
felt, be too obvious for anyone to make serious<br />
use <strong>of</strong> them, Fowler lists donate, now a fully<br />
accepted word.<br />
back <strong>of</strong>; in back <strong>of</strong>. Both <strong>of</strong> these phrases are<br />
standard English in the United States. A survey<br />
<strong>of</strong> American usage made about twenty-five years<br />
ago found that back <strong>of</strong> was thoroughly established<br />
but that in back <strong>of</strong> was “disputable.” Since<br />
then, in back <strong>of</strong> has been accepted in the finest<br />
circles. It appears in foreign-language dictionaries<br />
and vocabulary lists compiled by the most<br />
reputable institutions, and in publications <strong>of</strong> the<br />
United States Office <strong>of</strong> Education. (No one any<br />
longer questions the propriety <strong>of</strong> in front <strong>of</strong>.)<br />
backward; backwards. Backward is the only form<br />
that can be used to qualify a following noun, as<br />
in u backward glance. Either form may be used<br />
in any other construction, as in move backwards<br />
and move backward. In the United States the<br />
form backward is generally preferred.<br />
Bacon, the essayist, may be called Francis Bacon,<br />
Sir Francis Bacon, Baron Verulam <strong>of</strong> Verulam,<br />
Lord Verulam, Viscount St. Albans, or Lord<br />
St. Albans. Few men have had as many legitimate<br />
names. It is an error, however, to call him<br />
Lord Bacon.<br />
bacteria is a plural form and traditionally requires<br />
a plural verb.<br />
In general English bacteria is treated as a<br />
plural when it refers to a collection <strong>of</strong> individuals,<br />
as in these bacteria are dead and all bacteria<br />
are larger than viruses. But when it refers to a<br />
class or a variety, it may also be treated as a<br />
singular, as in this particular bacteria is harmless<br />
and a new bucteria has appeared. In this sense,<br />
a regular plural in s is sometimes heard, as in<br />
not enough is known aboat the bacterias. This is<br />
acceptable. But a double Latin plural, bacteriue,<br />
is not.<br />
The Latin singular bacterium is very rare. It<br />
is not heard in general English and is now too<br />
vague a term to be used in the laboratory. A<br />
technician who had isolated one <strong>of</strong> these organisms<br />
would call what he had found something<br />
more specific than a bacterium. The word occurs<br />
chiefly when this form <strong>of</strong> life is being discussed<br />
in connection with a virus.<br />
bad. The comparative form is worse. The superlative<br />
form is worst. At one time bad also had the<br />
forms budder and baddest, but these are no<br />
longer standard.<br />
A few generations ago, the word bud was an<br />
adjective and could only be used to qualify a<br />
noun; the word badly was an adverb and was<br />
the form required to qualify any word that was<br />
not a noun. This means that the form bud was<br />
required in sentences such as I felt bud, he<br />
looked bud, and so on, where it refers to, or<br />
qualifies, the subject <strong>of</strong> the verb. On the other<br />
hand, the form badly was required in sentences<br />
such as it hurt badly, because here the word<br />
refers to or qualifies the verb, that is, it tells how<br />
it hurt.<br />
51 baggage<br />
But today many people believe that I felt<br />
badly is a “nicer” expression than I felt bud.<br />
This technically incorrect form has now become<br />
acceptable English. We may say Z felt bad or<br />
Z felt badly. Having established itself after the<br />
verb feel, badly has begun to appear after other<br />
linking verbs, such as he looks badly, it smells<br />
badly, where bud is the traditionally correct<br />
form. Badly is not yet as well established after<br />
these other verbs as it is after feel. It sounds<br />
like a grammatical mistake to many people. But<br />
it is acceptable to many others and will probably<br />
be thoroughly established in time.<br />
As badly took over some <strong>of</strong> the functions <strong>of</strong><br />
bud, the form bad began to be used in place <strong>of</strong><br />
badly, as in it hnrt bud. This construction, once<br />
standard English, had been obsolete for several<br />
centuries when this revival began. Many people<br />
still object to this use <strong>of</strong> bad but it has not been<br />
attacked as energetically as the adjective use <strong>of</strong><br />
badly and will probably be standard English in<br />
time.<br />
Worse and less are the only comparative<br />
forms in English that do not end in r, and less<br />
now has the duplicate form lesser. The word<br />
worser, as in the worser sort, my worser self,<br />
was formerly as acceptable as lesser now is, but<br />
at present it is out <strong>of</strong> use and considered unacceptable<br />
by many people. The words worse and<br />
worst are both adverbs as well as adjectives.<br />
Only the form worst can be used before <strong>of</strong>,<br />
regardless <strong>of</strong> how many things are being talked<br />
about, as in in the collision between the convertible<br />
and the truck, the convertible got the worst<br />
<strong>of</strong> it. Worse <strong>of</strong> is unidiomatic English, and the<br />
fact that only two objects are being compared is<br />
irrelevant.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> worst for most, as in what I need<br />
worst is money, is objectionable to most people.<br />
bad blood between tbem. To say <strong>of</strong> those who<br />
have long nursed grudges against each other,<br />
who have an ingrained dislike and resentment<br />
<strong>of</strong> each other, that there is bud blood between<br />
them is to employ an anemic cliche.<br />
bade. See bid.<br />
bag and baggage. Baggage has a specialized meaning,<br />
the impedimenta <strong>of</strong> an army. With bag and<br />
baggage-with the property <strong>of</strong> the army as a<br />
whole and the properties <strong>of</strong> the individual soldiers-was<br />
sometimes one <strong>of</strong> the terms <strong>of</strong> an<br />
honorable retreat.<br />
The phrase, meaning “with one’s whole belongings,<br />
completely,” probably remained in<br />
popular use because <strong>of</strong> its alliteration. It is now<br />
a cliche with all <strong>of</strong> its original meaning lost and<br />
should be avoided in ordinary speech or writing.<br />
baggage; luggage. Baggage used to be the American<br />
word, luggage the English. But in recent<br />
years luggage has come into currency in America<br />
too. Airplanes and trains have luggage racks<br />
and what used to be called the trunk <strong>of</strong> an automobile<br />
is now <strong>of</strong>ten called the luggage compartment.<br />
In almost all combinations, however, it remains<br />
baggage: baggage room, baggage agent,