A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
such a sentence as It may have been a coincidence,<br />
<strong>of</strong> course, but if it were it was certainly<br />
an extraordinary one, it is hard to see what<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> course serves more than a rhythmic<br />
pause or a pompous clearing <strong>of</strong> the throat.<br />
<strong>of</strong>f. Originally <strong>of</strong>f was the word <strong>of</strong> pronounced<br />
emphatically. The same difference between a v<br />
and an f sound can be heard today in the<br />
auxiliary verb have, which we sometimes pronounce<br />
hafl. Speaking matter-<strong>of</strong>-factly, we might<br />
say Z have to leave, but when we are insisting<br />
we say Z huff to leave. For many centuries this<br />
was the only difference between <strong>of</strong> and <strong>of</strong>f. (See<br />
<strong>of</strong>.) But eventually the words became independent.<br />
Of kept the vaguer genitive meanings<br />
and is now used only as a preposition, that is,<br />
it is used only with an object. Off kept the older<br />
meaning <strong>of</strong> separation or removal from contact<br />
with, and can be used as a preposition, as in<br />
lift it <strong>of</strong>f the shelf; an adverb, as in Z can’t get<br />
it <strong>of</strong>f; or an adjective, as in an <strong>of</strong>f season.<br />
In he bought it <strong>of</strong>7 a peddler, <strong>of</strong>f expresses<br />
the genitive idea <strong>of</strong> source. This use <strong>of</strong> the word<br />
is still acceptable in Great Britain but not in<br />
the United States. In we can make a meal <strong>of</strong>7<br />
sandwiches, <strong>of</strong>f expresses the genitive idea <strong>of</strong><br />
material. This is acceptable only in statements<br />
about eating. All other meanings <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>f are<br />
derived from the idea <strong>of</strong> separation and imply<br />
a discontinuity <strong>of</strong> some kind.<br />
Ofl is related by its meaning to from and by<br />
its history to <strong>of</strong>. Formerly <strong>of</strong>i was <strong>of</strong>ten followed<br />
by <strong>of</strong>, as in lift it <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> the shelf, make<br />
a meal <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> sandwiches. This construction is<br />
still used by educated people in the United<br />
States but is not so used in Great Britain. OfJ<br />
can always be followed by from when the idea<br />
<strong>of</strong> separation is involved, as in we got <strong>of</strong>.7 from<br />
work. The combination o# from is heard in<br />
Great Britain more <strong>of</strong>ten than it is in the United<br />
States. Actually neither <strong>of</strong> nor from is ever<br />
necessary after <strong>of</strong>f. We can say simply <strong>of</strong>f the<br />
shelf, <strong>of</strong>,7 sandwiches, <strong>of</strong>i work. This is the preferred<br />
construction in the United States, but<br />
the compounds are also acceptable.<br />
<strong>of</strong>fensive. See insidious.<br />
<strong>of</strong>fer. This verb may be followed by an infmitive,<br />
as in Z <strong>of</strong>fered to go in his place. It is also heard<br />
with the -ing form <strong>of</strong> a verb, as in Z <strong>of</strong>fered<br />
going in his place, but the infinitive is preferred.<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice (in the sense <strong>of</strong> position). See assignment.<br />
o5cer, in the commonest contemporary sense <strong>of</strong><br />
the word, is one who holds a position <strong>of</strong> rank<br />
or authority in the army, navy, or any similar<br />
organization, especially one who holds a commission<br />
(The unit consisted <strong>of</strong> three <strong>of</strong>ficers and<br />
thirty men. Every time an enlisted man sees an<br />
<strong>of</strong>icer get an extra privilege, it breaks him down<br />
a little more), though there are also petty <strong>of</strong>ficers,<br />
warrant <strong>of</strong>ficers, and noncommissioned<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers. In its broadest sense, <strong>of</strong>icer designates<br />
one who is invested with an <strong>of</strong>fice. There are<br />
corporation <strong>of</strong>ficers and municipal <strong>of</strong>ficers, 05cers<br />
on a ship (these are more like army and<br />
navy <strong>of</strong>ficers) and peace <strong>of</strong>ficers. It is in this last<br />
category that policemen fall and the addressing<br />
<strong>of</strong> a policeman as <strong>of</strong>icer is more a slight<br />
archaism than the compliment it is <strong>of</strong>ten thought<br />
to be. Every policeman is an <strong>of</strong>ficer <strong>of</strong> the law<br />
and may be addressed as <strong>of</strong>ficer, but with the<br />
introduction into most police forces now <strong>of</strong> a<br />
gradation <strong>of</strong> rank similar to and modeled after<br />
that <strong>of</strong> the army, the word is coming to be<br />
applied to those in the force who hold ranks<br />
equal to those that would cause their holders<br />
in the army to be considered <strong>of</strong>ficers. The<br />
chances are that this tendency will increase with<br />
the increasing gradation <strong>of</strong> the police forces.<br />
If so, a new polite form <strong>of</strong> address for the<br />
common policeman will have to be found.<br />
olcial; <strong>of</strong>ficious. Ofhcial means <strong>of</strong> or pertaining<br />
to an <strong>of</strong>fice or position <strong>of</strong> duty, trust, or authority<br />
(His <strong>of</strong>icial powers were quite limited),<br />
authorized or issued authoritatively (The <strong>of</strong>icial<br />
report was eagerly awaited), holding <strong>of</strong>fice<br />
(He had no <strong>of</strong>icial capacity), appointed or authorized<br />
to act in a special capacity (He was at<br />
the convention as an <strong>of</strong>hcial delegate).<br />
O&ions formerly meant ready to serve,<br />
ready to exercise one’s appointed function.<br />
When Dr. Johnson in his elegy on his friend<br />
Robert Levett (1782) referred to Levett as<br />
<strong>of</strong>icious, innocent, sincere, he did not mean<br />
that Levett (who was a sort <strong>of</strong> amateur doctor)<br />
was meddlesome or intrusive but simply that<br />
he was always willing to help. It is a sad commentary<br />
on human nature, on either the vanity<br />
<strong>of</strong> many who give or the ingratitude <strong>of</strong> many<br />
who receive aid, that the word now connotes<br />
forwardness in <strong>of</strong>fering help, a fussy obtrusion<br />
<strong>of</strong> unwanted assistance (This <strong>of</strong>icious bustling<br />
about, with here a nod and there a gesture <strong>of</strong><br />
encouragement, was vastly annoying to most<br />
<strong>of</strong> those present).<br />
Generalizing on current usage, one can say<br />
that <strong>of</strong>icial is a general descriptive term, <strong>of</strong>icious<br />
an emotionally charged term imputing<br />
blame. In diplomatic usage, however, <strong>of</strong>bcious<br />
has a distinctly different meaning. Ofjiciul in<br />
diplomatic usage retains its usual sense <strong>of</strong> formal,<br />
authorized; but <strong>of</strong>icious, with no connotation<br />
<strong>of</strong> meddlesomeness, *means informal,<br />
unauthorized, not binding-the very antithesis<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>icial.<br />
<strong>of</strong>fspring is properly plural (The <strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong> this<br />
union were five boys and three girls). It has<br />
been used so much as a singular, .however<br />
(Have you ever met our <strong>of</strong>fspring, Jimmy,<br />
girls?), that this usage is accepted as standard,<br />
though it usually has a touch <strong>of</strong> the labored or<br />
facetious about it. The word is used <strong>of</strong> a child<br />
or animal in relation to its parent or parents<br />
or to designate a descendant or descendants<br />
collectively. By extension the word may mean<br />
the product, result or effect <strong>of</strong> something<br />
(Xanadu was supposedly the <strong>of</strong>fspring <strong>of</strong> an<br />
opium dream).<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten and frequently may be used interchangeably<br />
in most contexts but, where they differ, <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
is simpler and stronger. It suggests numerous<br />
repetitions and, sometimes, regularity <strong>of</strong> recurrence<br />
(I <strong>of</strong>ten visit my uncle who lives there).<br />
Frequently suggests repetition at short inter-