19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

abouts ought to be the preferred form, because<br />

the word is used to qualify a verb and s is a<br />

formal adverbial ending. But there is no evidence<br />

that it actually is preferred. Both forms<br />

may be used figuratively, as thereabouts in 5000<br />

inhabitants or thereabouts.<br />

there’s the rob; ay, there’s the rob. For those who<br />

choose to vary tedium with monotony the clich6<br />

there’s the rub may at times be replaced by its<br />

fuller form ay, there’s the rub. Rub, in this famous<br />

phrase (Hamlet, Act III, Scene l), means<br />

an obstacle, impediment, or hindrance, <strong>of</strong> a nonmaterial<br />

nature. It is derived from a term used<br />

in the game <strong>of</strong> bowls, where a rub is some obstacle<br />

or impediment by which a bowl is hindered<br />

or diverted from its intended course.<br />

thesaurus. The plural is thesauruses or thesauri.<br />

these. See this; that.<br />

thesis. The plural is thesises or theses.<br />

they. The words they, them, their, are used in<br />

speaking <strong>of</strong> more than one Ldividual. They may<br />

also be used in speaking <strong>of</strong> a single individual<br />

whose sex is unknown. For example, only the<br />

word his would be used in every soldier carried<br />

his O)Y~ pack, but most people would say their<br />

rather than his in everybody brought their own<br />

lunch. And it would be a violation <strong>of</strong> English<br />

idiom to say was he? in nobody was killed, were<br />

they? The use <strong>of</strong> they in speaking <strong>of</strong> a single<br />

individual is not a modern deviation from classical<br />

English. It is found in the works <strong>of</strong> many<br />

great writers, including Malory, Shakespeare,<br />

Swift, Defoe, Shelley, Austen, Scott, Kingsley,<br />

Dickens, Ruskin, George Eliot.<br />

They may be used generally or with a vague<br />

reference, as in they say, what have they done<br />

to you?, and they had strikes even then. This<br />

construction may be out <strong>of</strong> place when something<br />

more specific than they is wanted. But<br />

grammatically, this USC <strong>of</strong> they is in a class with<br />

the similar use <strong>of</strong> people or men and is equally<br />

acceptable.<br />

They may be used before a numeral, as in<br />

they two will wed the morrow morn. This is<br />

literary English, but archaic. To many people<br />

it sounds like the unacceptable use <strong>of</strong> them<br />

before a noun, as in them books, and the forms<br />

these two, those two, the two, are generally<br />

preferred. Traditionally, they and them may<br />

stand before a qualifying phrase or clause, as<br />

in blessed are they that mourn and the third<br />

and fourth generation <strong>of</strong> them that hate me, but<br />

in current English the words rhose or these are<br />

generally preferred in this position. (For when<br />

to use they rather than them, see subjective pronouns.)<br />

thick as thieves. As a humorous simile for a<br />

close, and slightly conspiratorial, intimacy, as<br />

thick as thieves, although it seems to be a creation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the twentieth century, is already a clichC.<br />

For those who want to avoid it but still feel a<br />

need for some such comparison, there are many<br />

established metaphors waiting: as thick as hail,<br />

as thick as hops, as thick as huckleberries, for<br />

those who wish to emphasize pr<strong>of</strong>usion; as thick<br />

as porridge, for those who have specific density<br />

509 think<br />

in mind; and for chumminess, a fine old Scotch<br />

simile, as thick as three in a bed.<br />

thief. The plural is thieves.<br />

thief; robber; burglar; bandit; gangster. A thief is<br />

one who takes another’s property by stealth, without<br />

the other’s knowledge. It is a word <strong>of</strong> contempt<br />

(Now does he feel his title/ Hang loose<br />

about him, like a giant’s robe/ Upon a dwarfish<br />

thief). A robber trespasses upon the house,<br />

property, or person <strong>of</strong> another, and makes away<br />

with things <strong>of</strong> value, even using violence (The<br />

robbers seem to have made their escape through<br />

the trap door and over the ro<strong>of</strong>s. Three masked<br />

robbers held up the First National Bank shortly<br />

after noon today). Where the robbery is committed<br />

in the open, with the threat or use <strong>of</strong> a<br />

knife or gun, or with felonious assault, the more<br />

common term in America today is hold-up man<br />

or men and the robbery itself is termed a holdup.<br />

Masked robbers or robbers whose depradations<br />

are accompanied by some dash or bravado<br />

are usually called, in the papers at least, bandits.<br />

It is a journalistic clicht, however, being little<br />

employed in ordinary speech or writing unless<br />

one is referring to Mexican outlaws. Gangster,<br />

a far-too-common word, is applied to members<br />

or assumed members <strong>of</strong> armed gangs, especially<br />

to those thought to be members <strong>of</strong> closely knit<br />

organizations controlled by some criminal mastermind,<br />

or to robbers or murderers whose violence<br />

is akin to that employed by the gangsters<br />

in their feuds or brushes with the law. Burglar<br />

is now a slightly old-fashioned term. It describes<br />

a felonious housebreaker, especially one who<br />

commits robbery by breaking into a house at<br />

night. See also steal; purloin; pilfer; etc.<br />

thieve. See steal.<br />

thieves. This is the plural <strong>of</strong> thief.<br />

thimblerig. See shell game.<br />

thine. See thy; tbine and my; mine.<br />

thing. In present-day English thing ordinarily<br />

means a material and inanimate thing, but the<br />

word is not limited to this meaning. Whatever<br />

can be talked about may be called a thing, as in<br />

men who were engineers and business managers<br />

and (I dozen other things. Under some circumstances<br />

even a quality may be called a thing, as<br />

in she was good, kind, honest, and everything a<br />

woman should be.<br />

think. The past tense is thought. The participle is<br />

also thought.<br />

If think is used in a passive form it may be<br />

followed by an infinitive, as in he is thought to<br />

have left. When it is used in an active form it<br />

may be followed by a clause, as in I think he has<br />

left. If the -ing form <strong>of</strong> a verb is used it must be<br />

introduced by <strong>of</strong>, as in he did not think <strong>of</strong><br />

leaving. Think, in an active form, is sometimes<br />

followed by an infinitive, as in I did not think to<br />

tell him. If in this sentence the word think means<br />

plan or expect, the construction is archaic. If it<br />

means remember, the construction is condemned<br />

by some grammarians, but is standard usage in<br />

the United States today.<br />

Think for is the standard English idiom in<br />

comparisons with than or as, as in more than

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!