19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

When little means a small amount or not<br />

much, it is always singular. It is used with a<br />

singular verb and cannot qualify a plural noun.<br />

If we say they gave us little troubles, the word<br />

little inevitably takes on the meaning <strong>of</strong> small<br />

in size or small in importance. To express the<br />

idea <strong>of</strong> small in amount with a plural noun, we<br />

must use the word few.<br />

Lesser is the comparative form <strong>of</strong> little in the<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> small in value or importance. Less is<br />

the comparative form in the sense <strong>of</strong> small in<br />

amount. (For the difference in the uses <strong>of</strong> these<br />

two words, see less; lesser.)<br />

Least is the superlative form for both less and<br />

lesser. At one time it could also be used in the<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> smallest in size, but this is now extremely<br />

rare. It may be used as an adjective, as<br />

in her least whim, or as an adverb, as in I am<br />

least happy now and with what I most enjoy,<br />

contented least. When the least qualifies a verb,<br />

it means in the least degree. Like the prepositional<br />

phrase, it can be used in a conditional<br />

clause, a question, or a negative statement, but<br />

not in an affirmative statement. We may say if<br />

you are the least worried or I am not the least<br />

worried, but we cannot say I am the least worried.<br />

We may, however, say I am the least bit<br />

worried, because here the least is not an adverb<br />

qualifying the verb but an adjective qualifying<br />

the noun bit, which in turn is functioning as an<br />

adverb.<br />

Lesser is a comparative form made from the<br />

comparative form less and is equivalent to more<br />

smaller. This does not prevent it from being<br />

standard English. On the other hand, the double<br />

superlative the leastest is not standard. But we<br />

may say the least little if we like.<br />

little bird told me. As a way <strong>of</strong> saying I have<br />

heard something but will not name my informant,<br />

a little bird told me is infantile, a sad attempt<br />

to appear cute.<br />

liturgy. See litany.<br />

live. This verb may be followed by an adjective<br />

describing the subject, as in they lived happy or<br />

they lived poor. It may also be followed by an<br />

adverb describing the verb, as in they lived happily<br />

or they lived poorly. Sometimes there is no<br />

real difference in meaning between the two<br />

forms. See also reside.<br />

live (adjective). In the meanings <strong>of</strong> alert and <strong>of</strong><br />

present interest (He’s a live fellow, that man!<br />

It’s still a live issue in these parts), live is slang,<br />

not standard. The trouble with such uses is that<br />

they are too general. Obviously, an alert man<br />

must be live, but a live man need not be alert,<br />

for alert suggests being live in a certain wayhaving<br />

a ready and prompt attentiveness together<br />

with a quick intelligence.<br />

live audience. Since an audience is an assembly<br />

<strong>of</strong> hearers or spectators, live audience should<br />

logically be a redundancy. And such it certainly<br />

would have been up until this generation. But it<br />

is an illustration <strong>of</strong> the strange and rapid ways<br />

that words can change their meanings and, at<br />

the same time, <strong>of</strong> the irrelevancy <strong>of</strong> applying<br />

logic to language, that this phrase has a clear<br />

locality<br />

and definite meaning to millions <strong>of</strong> people today<br />

and fills a need in their speech. In many radio<br />

shows that are heard and even some television<br />

shows that are being seen, the audience, whose<br />

ecstatic delight with the performance is intended<br />

to move the viewers either to join in thoughtlessly<br />

or at least to feel that if they don’t laugh<br />

the fault is theirs, is not there at all. The sounds<br />

are dubbed in from recordings made <strong>of</strong> genuine<br />

laughter at more amusing shows.<br />

livelong. See lifelong.<br />

lively. See breezy.<br />

lives. This is the plural <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

living from hand to mouth. As a term for improvidence<br />

or for a complete lack <strong>of</strong> any store<br />

<strong>of</strong> necessities, living from hand to mouth is worn<br />

threadbare.<br />

living in clover. As a term for luxurious living<br />

or simply good fortune living in clover or <strong>of</strong>ten,<br />

now, merely in clover (both shortenings <strong>of</strong> living<br />

like pigs in clover, clover being very rich<br />

fodder) is a cliche.<br />

Lloyd’s is a London insurance underwriting corporation,<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> some three hundred syndicates.<br />

It is so called because it was founded in<br />

the late seventeenth century at Edward Lloyd’s<br />

c<strong>of</strong>feehouse. It is spelled Lloyd’s, not Lloyds or<br />

Lloyds’.<br />

load. See jag.<br />

load down; load up. In the passive, American<br />

load down equals English load up (He returned<br />

from the New York Public Librarv loaded down<br />

with books. The lorries pulled out <strong>of</strong> Tilbury<br />

loaded up with ammunition). In the active,<br />

however, an American uses load up (Load up on<br />

that stuff you can grab and let’s get out <strong>of</strong> here).<br />

Ioadstone; lodestone. Though either form is correct,<br />

loadstone is preferred to lodestone. Lodestar,<br />

however, is preferred to loadstar.<br />

loaf. The plural is loaves.<br />

loan. The use <strong>of</strong> loan as a verb, as in he loaned<br />

me five dollars, is condemned in Great Britain<br />

as an Americanism. Actually, it is a very respectable<br />

verb. It has been in existence for almost<br />

eight hundred years and was used in an act<br />

<strong>of</strong> Parliament in 1542. It is thoroughly acceptable<br />

in the United States, especially when used<br />

by bankers or in speaking about money.<br />

loathe. This word may be followed by the -ing<br />

form <strong>of</strong> a verb, as in 2 loathe washing dishes, or<br />

by an infinitive, as in I loathe to wash dishes.<br />

Both forms are acceptable in the United States.<br />

See also hate.<br />

loaves. This is the plural <strong>of</strong> loaf.<br />

local habitation and a name. Shakespeare, in a<br />

glorious passage in A Midsummer Night’s<br />

Dream, says that the poet’s imagination bodies<br />

forth the forms <strong>of</strong> things rdnknown and his pen<br />

Turns them to shapes, and gives to airy nothing/<br />

A local habitation and a name. As a term for<br />

anything fixed and definite, the concluding<br />

phrase has been reduced to dreary meaninglessness<br />

by tedious repetition.<br />

locality; location. A locality is a place, spot, or<br />

district, with or without reference to things or<br />

persons in it, viewed in reference to its geo-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!