19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ible . . .?I’) and is used on all occasions to denote<br />

an exacting attention to detail.<br />

Scrupulous and punctilious are really more<br />

suitable words unless one wishes to suggest that<br />

the attention to detail is motivated by timidity.<br />

A punctilious man is one who is attentive to nice<br />

points, especially in conduct, ceremony or proceeding,<br />

observing the forms <strong>of</strong> politeness and<br />

correct social usage with great exactness (The<br />

marshal <strong>of</strong> the faculties insisted on punctilious<br />

consideration <strong>of</strong> academic standing in assigning<br />

the various pr<strong>of</strong>essors to their place in the commencement<br />

procession). A scrupulous man is<br />

one who is cautious for fear <strong>of</strong> erring, attaching<br />

great weight in his uneasiness to minute considerations,<br />

precise, rigorous (He was scrupulously<br />

honest, returning on one occasion to an astonished<br />

host a paper napkin which had been inadvertently<br />

packed among his things).<br />

metonymy is the rhetorical figure which expresses<br />

the name <strong>of</strong> a thing in terms <strong>of</strong> another which<br />

is a part <strong>of</strong> it or is associated with it. The use <strong>of</strong><br />

the part for the whole used to be differentiated<br />

as synecdoche, but the distinction scarcely exists<br />

any more.<br />

This figure <strong>of</strong> speech may take the form <strong>of</strong> an<br />

effect for a cause or a cause for an effect, as in<br />

The pen is mightier than the sword where pen<br />

stands for that which has been written by the<br />

pen. The commonest form <strong>of</strong> metonymy is the<br />

sign for the thing signified, as a good table for<br />

satisfying fare, the chair for the presiding <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />

sitting in the chair, Shakespeare for Shakespeare’s<br />

works, the press for newspapers, Washington<br />

for the federal government, the scepter<br />

for sovereignty or the bottle for strong drink.<br />

metropolis. The plural is metropolises or metropoles.<br />

mettie. See metal.<br />

meum et tuum or, more <strong>of</strong>ten, meum and tuum,<br />

literallv “mine and thine.” is now a clichC when<br />

used ai a general term for private property or<br />

for the distinction between what is one’s own<br />

and what belongs to others.<br />

mews. From meaning cages for hawks, this word<br />

came to mean a group <strong>of</strong> stables. In the United<br />

States it usually means stables that have been<br />

made over into elegant living quarters. The word<br />

is ordinarily a singular but it may also be used as<br />

a plural, as in the mews <strong>of</strong> London. A double<br />

plural mewses occurs in an act <strong>of</strong> Parliament <strong>of</strong><br />

1797 and so has at least that much standing.<br />

miasma. The plural is miasmas or miasmata, not<br />

miasmae.<br />

mice. See mouse.<br />

middle; midst. See center.<br />

Middle West; Middle Western; Midwest; Midwestern.<br />

Middle West is the preferred term to<br />

describe that region <strong>of</strong> the United States which<br />

is bounded on the east by the Allegheny Mountains,<br />

on the west by the Rocky Mountains, and<br />

on the south by the Ohio River and the southern<br />

boundaries <strong>of</strong> Missouri and Kansas. The preference<br />

is not overwhelming, however, and many,<br />

especially among the younger contemporary<br />

writers, seem to prefer Midwest. As adjectives,<br />

usage seems to favor Midwest and Midwestern<br />

over Middle West and Middle Western. The<br />

average inhabitant <strong>of</strong> this region is far more<br />

likely to call himself a Midwesterner than a<br />

Middle Westerner.<br />

midst. A generation ago many grammarians condemned<br />

the expression in our midst, on the<br />

grounds that there was no “true possession”<br />

here. They held that the only acceptable form<br />

was in the midst <strong>of</strong> us. The expression in our<br />

midst had been standard English since the time<br />

<strong>of</strong> Chaucer and there was no justification for<br />

limiting the genitive, or the possessive pronouns,<br />

to instances <strong>of</strong> “possession.” But the word midst<br />

does not seem to have survived the battle. In<br />

current English we say middle for things that<br />

actually have a midd!e, and among for collections<br />

that do not.<br />

midsummer madness, a quotation from Twelfth<br />

Night (III, iv, 61), as a term for the height <strong>of</strong><br />

folly, is worn out.<br />

might. See may.<br />

might and main, with all one%. Might and main<br />

may once have had distinct meanings, such as<br />

skill and strength, but all memory <strong>of</strong> any such<br />

distinction has been forgotten and the phrase<br />

continues in use chiefly through inertia and the<br />

fatal fascination <strong>of</strong> alliteration.<br />

mighty; almighty. The word mighty was once very<br />

popular as an intensive, as in mighty glad to see<br />

you and mighty good <strong>of</strong> you to come. It was<br />

thoroughly respectable and much more forceful<br />

than the little word very. Although it is not<br />

heard as frequently today, it has an old-fashioned<br />

rather than a nonstandard tone. Some<br />

younger people use it half humorously, in imitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> their grandparents.<br />

Almighty was once also used as an intensive in<br />

this country, as in almighty smart, almighty<br />

quick. But this word was always questionable. It<br />

was used by strong men but not by ladies. Perhaps<br />

nobody was quite sure whether it was taking<br />

the name <strong>of</strong> God in vain or not.<br />

mile. Only the singular form mile should be used<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> a compound adjective qualifying a<br />

following noun, as in a ten-mile walk. The form<br />

with s is sometimes heard here, as in a ten-miles<br />

walk, but this is not literary English.<br />

Except in this one position, the singular mile<br />

should not be used in speaking <strong>of</strong> more than one<br />

mile. It sometimes is used in place <strong>of</strong> miles after<br />

a numeral, as in we live ten mile from here. This<br />

construction was literary English two hundred<br />

years ago, but it is not now standard.<br />

militate. See mitigate.<br />

milk <strong>of</strong> human kindness. Lady Macbeth feared<br />

that Macbeth was too full <strong>of</strong> the milk <strong>of</strong> human<br />

kindness to catch the nearest way to the crown<br />

by murdering his liege lord and benefactor. Her<br />

term for humanity or pity, unsurpassed in its<br />

original context, is now hackneyed.<br />

mill. In both England and America mill. as a<br />

transitive verb,-has a meaning consistent with<br />

its primary meaning as a noun; that is, it means<br />

to grind, work, treat, or shape in or with a mill<br />

(In Minneapolis wheat from the prairie states is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!