A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
fragile 188<br />
Decimals, which are a class <strong>of</strong> fractions, are<br />
aiways expressed in figures, as in 0.58 grams.<br />
A fraction may be treated as a singular or a<br />
plural, depending on whether it is thought <strong>of</strong><br />
as a unit or as a certain number <strong>of</strong> individuals,<br />
as in three-fourths <strong>of</strong> the surface <strong>of</strong> the earth is<br />
sea and three-fourths <strong>of</strong> the people are illiterate.<br />
In speaking <strong>of</strong> human beings a plural verb is<br />
generally preferred, and we say one percent are,<br />
one in ten are.<br />
Traditionally, a fraction that ends in s, and<br />
that is being used to indicate a physical distance,<br />
drops the s when it stands before another noun,<br />
as in three-eighth inch plate. It retains the s<br />
when it is used to measure anything except distance,<br />
as in a two-thirds reduction, a three-fifths<br />
majority. In the United States today these fractions<br />
usually retain the s, even in distance<br />
measurements, and the form without s is seldom<br />
heard. The word three-quarters is an exception<br />
to the rule. In literary English and in current<br />
speech, it may appear with or without the s, as<br />
in a three-quarter majority, a three-quarters inch<br />
board.<br />
Fractions may be used as adverbs <strong>of</strong> measure,<br />
as in the day is two-thirds gone, he is half dead.<br />
With the exception <strong>of</strong> half, a fraction used in<br />
this way must begin with a numeral or the word<br />
a. We may say it is one-quarter gone or a<br />
quarter gone, but not it is quarter gone.<br />
fragile: frail: brittle. That which is fragile is easilv<br />
broken, shattered, or damaged. it must bk<br />
handled with care to avoid breakage (These<br />
spun glass fiowers are extremely fragile). Frail<br />
is simply a variant <strong>of</strong> fragile and in many contexts<br />
the two words are interchangeable; whatever<br />
is fragile is frail. But frail has acquired<br />
some special meanings <strong>of</strong> its own; everything<br />
that is frail is not necessarily fragile. Frail, in<br />
particular, applies to health and to immaterial<br />
things (Though still active in his ninetieth year,<br />
he was very frail. Alas, her vows proved frail).<br />
Brittle applies to anything that breaks readily<br />
with a comparatively smooth fracture (Old<br />
bones arc brittle). It usually implies a hard outside<br />
finish on delicate material. It has always<br />
had metaphorical uses (One w<strong>of</strong>ul day sweeps<br />
children, friends and wife/ And all the brittle<br />
blessings <strong>of</strong> my life) and at the present is<br />
almost, in this use, a vogue word (brittle wit,<br />
bright and brittle conversation).<br />
fragile; frangible. That is frangible which is capable<br />
<strong>of</strong> being broken. The word is usually restricted<br />
to material objects and literal breakableness.<br />
That is fragile which is easily broken,<br />
delicate, brittle, or frail. It might be said that<br />
human bones are frangible but that the bones<br />
<strong>of</strong> the aged are fragile.<br />
frank, candid and outspoken imply a freedom<br />
from conventional reticence in speech, a blunt<br />
boldness, an uninhibited sincerity and plainness<br />
in speaking the truth. Virtues, surely, yet virtues<br />
that lend themselves so easily and so <strong>of</strong>ten as<br />
disguises for malice that the world, which doesn’t<br />
like them very much anyway, reinforces its<br />
natural distaste with a justified suspicion. Frank<br />
is the least tainted <strong>of</strong> the three. A frank and<br />
open countenance is wholly laudatory. A frank<br />
statement <strong>of</strong> the case, however, is plainly<br />
colored by the speaker’s agreement with the<br />
statement and a frank criticism may be a euphemism<br />
for a spiteful calumny. Candid suggests<br />
fairness, openness <strong>of</strong> mind, sincerity and truthfulness;<br />
yet there is <strong>of</strong>ten a suggestion <strong>of</strong> unpleasantness<br />
about the exercise <strong>of</strong> these admirable<br />
qualities. They are outspoken who express<br />
themselves freely, without reserve or concealment,<br />
even when it is inappropriate to do so.<br />
Such men, like Alceste in Moliere’s The<br />
Misanthrope, displace all mirth and break many<br />
a good meeting with admir’d disorder, and while<br />
they are praised by the simple, especially those<br />
among the simple whose resentments their behavior<br />
has gratified, they are disliked by the<br />
more sophisticated.<br />
Frankenstein. Properly Frankenstein was not the<br />
monster in Mary Shelley’s book but the creator<br />
<strong>of</strong> the monster, a sensitive, high-minded young<br />
student who accidentally stumbled on “the<br />
secret <strong>of</strong> life” and bitterly rued the day he did.<br />
And even the monster himself, for all his resentful<br />
homicides, was not intended to be wholly<br />
repulsive. The novel was written as a Rousseauistic<br />
treatise on education; the monster was bad<br />
because he was unloved. None the less the term<br />
is now established (“almost, but surely not quite,<br />
sanctioned by custom,” cries Fowler in a plea<br />
which he must have felt to be futile) as a name<br />
for any monstrous creation, especially one that<br />
threatens to destroy its creator (The Republicans<br />
have created this Frankenstein. They must deal<br />
with him). In the novel, by the way, the monster<br />
does not kill Frankenstein. Frankenstein dies<br />
from exposure while pursuing the fleeing monster<br />
across the arctic wastes.<br />
frankly. How our hearts sink at a prefatory<br />
frankly, for we know some brutality is to follow,<br />
and a craven brutality, too, that having by this<br />
preface claimed a simple plainness will feel free<br />
to recoil in shocked horror, aghast at our brutality<br />
or pitying our inability to face the truth,<br />
should we reply in kind.<br />
frantic; furious; rabid. To be frantic is to be wild<br />
with excitement, whether it be <strong>of</strong> passion, delight,<br />
fear, or pain, to be in a state <strong>of</strong> frenzy,<br />
bordering on delirium (As the night passed and<br />
the child could not be found the woman grew<br />
frantic and could scarcely be restrained by her<br />
neighbors from rushing out into the storm).<br />
Furious suggests great violence, the releasing <strong>of</strong><br />
tremendous (usually malignant) energies (At<br />
the bursting <strong>of</strong> the oil storage tank the flames<br />
surged furiously upwards and engulfed the remainder<br />
<strong>of</strong> the building). When applied to<br />
human beings, it suggests, like frantic, a state <strong>of</strong><br />
violence close to madness, but furious suggests<br />
a more outward-directed, aggressive violence,<br />
anger carried to the extreme (On receipt <strong>of</strong> the<br />
news he was furious and ordered the hostages<br />
to be massacred). Rabid means raving mad,<br />
irrational in the extreme, furious, raving, but<br />
it is usually applied to the carrying to excess <strong>of</strong><br />
some one concern (The rabid isolationists would<br />
have had us discontinue even commercial rela-