19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

fragile 188<br />

Decimals, which are a class <strong>of</strong> fractions, are<br />

aiways expressed in figures, as in 0.58 grams.<br />

A fraction may be treated as a singular or a<br />

plural, depending on whether it is thought <strong>of</strong><br />

as a unit or as a certain number <strong>of</strong> individuals,<br />

as in three-fourths <strong>of</strong> the surface <strong>of</strong> the earth is<br />

sea and three-fourths <strong>of</strong> the people are illiterate.<br />

In speaking <strong>of</strong> human beings a plural verb is<br />

generally preferred, and we say one percent are,<br />

one in ten are.<br />

Traditionally, a fraction that ends in s, and<br />

that is being used to indicate a physical distance,<br />

drops the s when it stands before another noun,<br />

as in three-eighth inch plate. It retains the s<br />

when it is used to measure anything except distance,<br />

as in a two-thirds reduction, a three-fifths<br />

majority. In the United States today these fractions<br />

usually retain the s, even in distance<br />

measurements, and the form without s is seldom<br />

heard. The word three-quarters is an exception<br />

to the rule. In literary English and in current<br />

speech, it may appear with or without the s, as<br />

in a three-quarter majority, a three-quarters inch<br />

board.<br />

Fractions may be used as adverbs <strong>of</strong> measure,<br />

as in the day is two-thirds gone, he is half dead.<br />

With the exception <strong>of</strong> half, a fraction used in<br />

this way must begin with a numeral or the word<br />

a. We may say it is one-quarter gone or a<br />

quarter gone, but not it is quarter gone.<br />

fragile: frail: brittle. That which is fragile is easilv<br />

broken, shattered, or damaged. it must bk<br />

handled with care to avoid breakage (These<br />

spun glass fiowers are extremely fragile). Frail<br />

is simply a variant <strong>of</strong> fragile and in many contexts<br />

the two words are interchangeable; whatever<br />

is fragile is frail. But frail has acquired<br />

some special meanings <strong>of</strong> its own; everything<br />

that is frail is not necessarily fragile. Frail, in<br />

particular, applies to health and to immaterial<br />

things (Though still active in his ninetieth year,<br />

he was very frail. Alas, her vows proved frail).<br />

Brittle applies to anything that breaks readily<br />

with a comparatively smooth fracture (Old<br />

bones arc brittle). It usually implies a hard outside<br />

finish on delicate material. It has always<br />

had metaphorical uses (One w<strong>of</strong>ul day sweeps<br />

children, friends and wife/ And all the brittle<br />

blessings <strong>of</strong> my life) and at the present is<br />

almost, in this use, a vogue word (brittle wit,<br />

bright and brittle conversation).<br />

fragile; frangible. That is frangible which is capable<br />

<strong>of</strong> being broken. The word is usually restricted<br />

to material objects and literal breakableness.<br />

That is fragile which is easily broken,<br />

delicate, brittle, or frail. It might be said that<br />

human bones are frangible but that the bones<br />

<strong>of</strong> the aged are fragile.<br />

frank, candid and outspoken imply a freedom<br />

from conventional reticence in speech, a blunt<br />

boldness, an uninhibited sincerity and plainness<br />

in speaking the truth. Virtues, surely, yet virtues<br />

that lend themselves so easily and so <strong>of</strong>ten as<br />

disguises for malice that the world, which doesn’t<br />

like them very much anyway, reinforces its<br />

natural distaste with a justified suspicion. Frank<br />

is the least tainted <strong>of</strong> the three. A frank and<br />

open countenance is wholly laudatory. A frank<br />

statement <strong>of</strong> the case, however, is plainly<br />

colored by the speaker’s agreement with the<br />

statement and a frank criticism may be a euphemism<br />

for a spiteful calumny. Candid suggests<br />

fairness, openness <strong>of</strong> mind, sincerity and truthfulness;<br />

yet there is <strong>of</strong>ten a suggestion <strong>of</strong> unpleasantness<br />

about the exercise <strong>of</strong> these admirable<br />

qualities. They are outspoken who express<br />

themselves freely, without reserve or concealment,<br />

even when it is inappropriate to do so.<br />

Such men, like Alceste in Moliere’s The<br />

Misanthrope, displace all mirth and break many<br />

a good meeting with admir’d disorder, and while<br />

they are praised by the simple, especially those<br />

among the simple whose resentments their behavior<br />

has gratified, they are disliked by the<br />

more sophisticated.<br />

Frankenstein. Properly Frankenstein was not the<br />

monster in Mary Shelley’s book but the creator<br />

<strong>of</strong> the monster, a sensitive, high-minded young<br />

student who accidentally stumbled on “the<br />

secret <strong>of</strong> life” and bitterly rued the day he did.<br />

And even the monster himself, for all his resentful<br />

homicides, was not intended to be wholly<br />

repulsive. The novel was written as a Rousseauistic<br />

treatise on education; the monster was bad<br />

because he was unloved. None the less the term<br />

is now established (“almost, but surely not quite,<br />

sanctioned by custom,” cries Fowler in a plea<br />

which he must have felt to be futile) as a name<br />

for any monstrous creation, especially one that<br />

threatens to destroy its creator (The Republicans<br />

have created this Frankenstein. They must deal<br />

with him). In the novel, by the way, the monster<br />

does not kill Frankenstein. Frankenstein dies<br />

from exposure while pursuing the fleeing monster<br />

across the arctic wastes.<br />

frankly. How our hearts sink at a prefatory<br />

frankly, for we know some brutality is to follow,<br />

and a craven brutality, too, that having by this<br />

preface claimed a simple plainness will feel free<br />

to recoil in shocked horror, aghast at our brutality<br />

or pitying our inability to face the truth,<br />

should we reply in kind.<br />

frantic; furious; rabid. To be frantic is to be wild<br />

with excitement, whether it be <strong>of</strong> passion, delight,<br />

fear, or pain, to be in a state <strong>of</strong> frenzy,<br />

bordering on delirium (As the night passed and<br />

the child could not be found the woman grew<br />

frantic and could scarcely be restrained by her<br />

neighbors from rushing out into the storm).<br />

Furious suggests great violence, the releasing <strong>of</strong><br />

tremendous (usually malignant) energies (At<br />

the bursting <strong>of</strong> the oil storage tank the flames<br />

surged furiously upwards and engulfed the remainder<br />

<strong>of</strong> the building). When applied to<br />

human beings, it suggests, like frantic, a state <strong>of</strong><br />

violence close to madness, but furious suggests<br />

a more outward-directed, aggressive violence,<br />

anger carried to the extreme (On receipt <strong>of</strong> the<br />

news he was furious and ordered the hostages<br />

to be massacred). Rabid means raving mad,<br />

irrational in the extreme, furious, raving, but<br />

it is usually applied to the carrying to excess <strong>of</strong><br />

some one concern (The rabid isolationists would<br />

have had us discontinue even commercial rela-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!