19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

peevish 362<br />

few others as good, but he never met his peer).<br />

The error stems from the fact that peer in English<br />

usage describes a nobleman--a duke, a marquis,<br />

an earl, a viscount, or a baron. The holders<br />

<strong>of</strong> such titles are each other’s peers. When they<br />

are tried by a jury <strong>of</strong> their peers, they are tried<br />

not by a jury <strong>of</strong> commoners but by the House <strong>of</strong><br />

Lords or, as it is sometimes called, the House <strong>of</strong><br />

Peers, or the Peers. Though they are each other’s<br />

peers, they are not, legally, on a level with common<br />

citizens. Very few distinctions are now<br />

made, though formerly there were many and<br />

they were important, and it is only natural<br />

(linguistically) that the word which signified<br />

equality in the higher rank should signify superiority<br />

in the lower rank. But it is ironic that the<br />

error should be so persistent in the country<br />

which abrogated all distinctions <strong>of</strong> rank and<br />

reduced (or exalted) all to a peerage.<br />

peevish. See petulant.<br />

pejorative means depreciative, having a disparaging<br />

force. In grammar it is used <strong>of</strong> words which<br />

through certain uses and associations have come<br />

to have a worse meaning than the one they<br />

originally had and convey contempt or condemnation<br />

<strong>of</strong> that to which they are applied. Thus<br />

knave once meant a boy, a boor was only a<br />

farmer, and a villain a serf or peasant. Certain<br />

suffixes have a pejorative effect; -ster is one <strong>of</strong><br />

these, though it does not invariably suggest<br />

disparagement. A poetaster is not a true poet<br />

but a mere versifier or dabbler in rime. In<br />

punster there is a suggestion <strong>of</strong> contempt for one<br />

who is addicted to punning.<br />

pence; penny. Pence is a peculiarly British term<br />

to denote the collective plural <strong>of</strong> penny. The<br />

distributive plural <strong>of</strong> penny is pennies; that is,<br />

the word which describes the number <strong>of</strong> coins,<br />

in distinction from the sum indicating value (I<br />

gave him three pennies to pay my threepence<br />

fare). Since it is used collectively, pence is treated<br />

as singular (Fourpence is the usual fee). Pence<br />

is not used <strong>of</strong> American sums. Penny and pennies<br />

are used loosely, for cent and cents, a folk<br />

memory, perhaps, <strong>of</strong> the days before and the<br />

generation or so after the Revolution when the<br />

penny was a part <strong>of</strong> our currency.<br />

penetrate; pervade. To penetrate is to pierce into<br />

or through, to enter the interior <strong>of</strong> (Only heavy<br />

slugs will penetrate the armor. No one seems<br />

able to penetrate his reserve). To pervade is to<br />

diffuse throughout, to extend activities and influence<br />

throughout (Goodwill pervaded the conference).<br />

If we say, for example, The smell <strong>of</strong> ether<br />

penetrated the doctor’s <strong>of</strong>fice, we mean that the<br />

smell reached that far and entered. If we say<br />

The smell <strong>of</strong> ether pervaded the doctor’s <strong>of</strong>ice,<br />

we mean that it was everywhere throughout the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice. The difficulty lies in the fact that the two<br />

effects are not always clearly distinguishable.<br />

Oils and heat, liniments, and even ideas, can<br />

penetrate and pervade. This has led to the<br />

meaning <strong>of</strong> pervading <strong>of</strong>ten being expressed as<br />

penetrating, and where the two actions are inseparable<br />

the usage must be acceptable. But<br />

where they are distinguishable it is well to use<br />

the proper verb. See also pervade.<br />

penmanship. Pride in handwriting as expression<br />

<strong>of</strong> character is no longer cultivated. In fact, it<br />

seems to have been replaced by the notion that<br />

illegibility in itself reflects certain admired traits<br />

-such as dash, authority and savoir-faire. Perhaps<br />

our great-grandfathers spent too much time<br />

on penmanship, as they did on spelling, learning<br />

more to form attractive, readable characters<br />

than to express themselves in meaningful language.<br />

In the late nineteenth century the approved<br />

style <strong>of</strong> penmanship was the Spencerian, recognizable<br />

by its light upstrokes, heavy downstrokes<br />

and elaborate curlicues. The twentieth century<br />

saw this superseded by the Palmer method,<br />

whose watchword was “free arm-movement.”<br />

The decorative style <strong>of</strong> the Spencerian method<br />

was replaced by a simpler, more graceful script<br />

which sought only to be legible.<br />

In most moderately progressive schools today,<br />

cursive writing is not taught until the third grade<br />

-and typing is usually <strong>of</strong>fered as an elective in<br />

the eighth grade. It is claimed that small muscles<br />

are not sufficiently coordinated to make the fine<br />

movements necessary for handwriting; whereas<br />

printing is much less demanding. Many children<br />

continue to print as long as it is acceptable at<br />

school, or develop a combination <strong>of</strong> printing<br />

and cursive styles. If legibility is the aim there<br />

can be no objection to this, for it serves that end<br />

very well, and it may be that we have now<br />

waded so far into illegibility <strong>of</strong> script that the<br />

easiest way out is to go ahead with printing.<br />

Certainly something will have to be done, unless<br />

we become complete artifacts and have<br />

typewriters built into us, for most handwritings<br />

now are almost entirely illegible. Much <strong>of</strong> everyday<br />

business still depends on written communications<br />

and memoranda and these must be legible.<br />

The Illinois Bell Telephone Company has<br />

stated that it loses $50,000 a year because<br />

operators can’t write call tickets plainly, and<br />

probably every other large business suffers a<br />

similar loss, a loss which in the aggregate must<br />

run into many millions. Post <strong>of</strong>fices across the<br />

country are full <strong>of</strong> dead letters, most <strong>of</strong> which<br />

are dead because they are illegible, illegible even<br />

to the staff <strong>of</strong> experts in illegibility which the<br />

Post Office has to maintain.<br />

pen name. See nom de plume.<br />

penniless. See poor.<br />

penult, penultimate; antepenult, autepenultimate.<br />

Penult and penultimate are the short and long<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> a noun meaning the last syllable but<br />

one <strong>of</strong> a word. Of the two, penult is preferable<br />

(The penult in American is i). Similarly, both<br />

antepenult and antepenultimate are forms <strong>of</strong> a<br />

noun meaning the last syllable but two in a word<br />

(The antepenult <strong>of</strong> American is er). Again, the<br />

shorter form is preferable in the noun. In the<br />

adjective, penultimute and. antepenultimate are<br />

preferred.<br />

penurious. See poor.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!