A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
peevish 362<br />
few others as good, but he never met his peer).<br />
The error stems from the fact that peer in English<br />
usage describes a nobleman--a duke, a marquis,<br />
an earl, a viscount, or a baron. The holders<br />
<strong>of</strong> such titles are each other’s peers. When they<br />
are tried by a jury <strong>of</strong> their peers, they are tried<br />
not by a jury <strong>of</strong> commoners but by the House <strong>of</strong><br />
Lords or, as it is sometimes called, the House <strong>of</strong><br />
Peers, or the Peers. Though they are each other’s<br />
peers, they are not, legally, on a level with common<br />
citizens. Very few distinctions are now<br />
made, though formerly there were many and<br />
they were important, and it is only natural<br />
(linguistically) that the word which signified<br />
equality in the higher rank should signify superiority<br />
in the lower rank. But it is ironic that the<br />
error should be so persistent in the country<br />
which abrogated all distinctions <strong>of</strong> rank and<br />
reduced (or exalted) all to a peerage.<br />
peevish. See petulant.<br />
pejorative means depreciative, having a disparaging<br />
force. In grammar it is used <strong>of</strong> words which<br />
through certain uses and associations have come<br />
to have a worse meaning than the one they<br />
originally had and convey contempt or condemnation<br />
<strong>of</strong> that to which they are applied. Thus<br />
knave once meant a boy, a boor was only a<br />
farmer, and a villain a serf or peasant. Certain<br />
suffixes have a pejorative effect; -ster is one <strong>of</strong><br />
these, though it does not invariably suggest<br />
disparagement. A poetaster is not a true poet<br />
but a mere versifier or dabbler in rime. In<br />
punster there is a suggestion <strong>of</strong> contempt for one<br />
who is addicted to punning.<br />
pence; penny. Pence is a peculiarly British term<br />
to denote the collective plural <strong>of</strong> penny. The<br />
distributive plural <strong>of</strong> penny is pennies; that is,<br />
the word which describes the number <strong>of</strong> coins,<br />
in distinction from the sum indicating value (I<br />
gave him three pennies to pay my threepence<br />
fare). Since it is used collectively, pence is treated<br />
as singular (Fourpence is the usual fee). Pence<br />
is not used <strong>of</strong> American sums. Penny and pennies<br />
are used loosely, for cent and cents, a folk<br />
memory, perhaps, <strong>of</strong> the days before and the<br />
generation or so after the Revolution when the<br />
penny was a part <strong>of</strong> our currency.<br />
penetrate; pervade. To penetrate is to pierce into<br />
or through, to enter the interior <strong>of</strong> (Only heavy<br />
slugs will penetrate the armor. No one seems<br />
able to penetrate his reserve). To pervade is to<br />
diffuse throughout, to extend activities and influence<br />
throughout (Goodwill pervaded the conference).<br />
If we say, for example, The smell <strong>of</strong> ether<br />
penetrated the doctor’s <strong>of</strong>fice, we mean that the<br />
smell reached that far and entered. If we say<br />
The smell <strong>of</strong> ether pervaded the doctor’s <strong>of</strong>ice,<br />
we mean that it was everywhere throughout the<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice. The difficulty lies in the fact that the two<br />
effects are not always clearly distinguishable.<br />
Oils and heat, liniments, and even ideas, can<br />
penetrate and pervade. This has led to the<br />
meaning <strong>of</strong> pervading <strong>of</strong>ten being expressed as<br />
penetrating, and where the two actions are inseparable<br />
the usage must be acceptable. But<br />
where they are distinguishable it is well to use<br />
the proper verb. See also pervade.<br />
penmanship. Pride in handwriting as expression<br />
<strong>of</strong> character is no longer cultivated. In fact, it<br />
seems to have been replaced by the notion that<br />
illegibility in itself reflects certain admired traits<br />
-such as dash, authority and savoir-faire. Perhaps<br />
our great-grandfathers spent too much time<br />
on penmanship, as they did on spelling, learning<br />
more to form attractive, readable characters<br />
than to express themselves in meaningful language.<br />
In the late nineteenth century the approved<br />
style <strong>of</strong> penmanship was the Spencerian, recognizable<br />
by its light upstrokes, heavy downstrokes<br />
and elaborate curlicues. The twentieth century<br />
saw this superseded by the Palmer method,<br />
whose watchword was “free arm-movement.”<br />
The decorative style <strong>of</strong> the Spencerian method<br />
was replaced by a simpler, more graceful script<br />
which sought only to be legible.<br />
In most moderately progressive schools today,<br />
cursive writing is not taught until the third grade<br />
-and typing is usually <strong>of</strong>fered as an elective in<br />
the eighth grade. It is claimed that small muscles<br />
are not sufficiently coordinated to make the fine<br />
movements necessary for handwriting; whereas<br />
printing is much less demanding. Many children<br />
continue to print as long as it is acceptable at<br />
school, or develop a combination <strong>of</strong> printing<br />
and cursive styles. If legibility is the aim there<br />
can be no objection to this, for it serves that end<br />
very well, and it may be that we have now<br />
waded so far into illegibility <strong>of</strong> script that the<br />
easiest way out is to go ahead with printing.<br />
Certainly something will have to be done, unless<br />
we become complete artifacts and have<br />
typewriters built into us, for most handwritings<br />
now are almost entirely illegible. Much <strong>of</strong> everyday<br />
business still depends on written communications<br />
and memoranda and these must be legible.<br />
The Illinois Bell Telephone Company has<br />
stated that it loses $50,000 a year because<br />
operators can’t write call tickets plainly, and<br />
probably every other large business suffers a<br />
similar loss, a loss which in the aggregate must<br />
run into many millions. Post <strong>of</strong>fices across the<br />
country are full <strong>of</strong> dead letters, most <strong>of</strong> which<br />
are dead because they are illegible, illegible even<br />
to the staff <strong>of</strong> experts in illegibility which the<br />
Post Office has to maintain.<br />
pen name. See nom de plume.<br />
penniless. See poor.<br />
penult, penultimate; antepenult, autepenultimate.<br />
Penult and penultimate are the short and long<br />
forms <strong>of</strong> a noun meaning the last syllable but<br />
one <strong>of</strong> a word. Of the two, penult is preferable<br />
(The penult in American is i). Similarly, both<br />
antepenult and antepenultimate are forms <strong>of</strong> a<br />
noun meaning the last syllable but two in a word<br />
(The antepenult <strong>of</strong> American is er). Again, the<br />
shorter form is preferable in the noun. In the<br />
adjective, penultimute and. antepenultimate are<br />
preferred.<br />
penurious. See poor.