19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Here the is an adverb <strong>of</strong> degree and means “that<br />

much.” In literary English this adverbial the is<br />

not used unless something else is said somewhere<br />

in the context that has a bearing on “that<br />

much.” For this reason, adverbial the is sometimes<br />

called a conjunction. The “something else”<br />

may refer to the cause <strong>of</strong> the increase, as for if<br />

in the example given; or it may refer to the<br />

amount. The amount is frequently “none” or<br />

“all,” as in none the worse and all the .better.<br />

Sometimes a double adverbial the is used to<br />

show that two increases are equal, as .in the<br />

more the merrier, the more he gets the more he<br />

wants. A comparative form should not be used<br />

with both the and than. The adjective t.he requires<br />

or implies <strong>of</strong>, as in the keener <strong>of</strong> the two,<br />

the keener man. Adverbial the merely indicates<br />

that additional information is available, and is<br />

never used in making a comparison. A the which<br />

serves neither function should not be used, as it<br />

is in if you are not the politer I will slap you.<br />

Sometimes a comparison <strong>of</strong> equality, requiring<br />

as . . . as, and a comparison <strong>of</strong> inequality, requiring<br />

than, are combined in the same statement,<br />

as in he had as much or more troubl(e than<br />

I did and he had more or at least as much<br />

trouble as I did. In both cases the comparisons<br />

have been telescoped. In the first sentence a<br />

second as, needed for a comparison <strong>of</strong> equality,<br />

has been lost. In the second sentence a than,<br />

needed for the inequality, is lost. Some grammarians<br />

object to telescoped constructions <strong>of</strong><br />

this kind, but they are acceptable, and customary,<br />

English. If one wants to please the igrammarians<br />

he can avoid the problem by writing,<br />

for example, he had as much trouble as I a’id, or<br />

more.<br />

There are a number <strong>of</strong> words in English ending<br />

in -ior, such as superior, inferior, posterior,<br />

interior, senior, which are Latin comparatives.<br />

In English they are not felt as comparatives and<br />

may be qualified by more or less. But they may<br />

also be used alone in making comparisons.<br />

When they are, they require the preposition ro<br />

and not the conjunction than.<br />

A few words, such as former, latter, #elder,<br />

inner, upper, are English comparative forms that<br />

are no longer used in making comparisons. They<br />

are now felt as simple adjectives which name a<br />

relationship and describe or identify individuals.<br />

We may say the latter period, the elder man,<br />

but we cannot say this period is latter than, this<br />

man is elder than.<br />

comparisons are odious is a proverb, and no wise<br />

man would agree to exclude proverbs from his<br />

speech or writing. But he will take care to use<br />

them sparingly and only when the occasion calls<br />

without doubt for their use. This one is hackneyed-though<br />

<strong>of</strong> course its wisdom is pr<strong>of</strong>’ound<br />

and useful. That comparisons are odorous is<br />

from Much Ado About Nothing and no wise<br />

man will attempt to cheat Shakespeare <strong>of</strong> whatever<br />

honor there is in its wit.<br />

compasses. In referring to an instrument for drawing<br />

circles, the singular form compass may be<br />

used, as in fix one foot <strong>of</strong> the compass here, and<br />

the plural compasses in speaking <strong>of</strong> several such<br />

107 competent<br />

instruments, as in we have three compasses, But<br />

the plural form is also used in speaking <strong>of</strong> one<br />

instrument, as in fix one foot <strong>of</strong> the compasses<br />

here, and three instruments are called three pairs<br />

<strong>of</strong> compnsses. Both constructions are standard<br />

English today. Only the singular form compass<br />

is used as the first element in a compound, as in<br />

a compass leg.<br />

cumpel; impel. Compel and impel both mean the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> a force, physical or otherwise, to<br />

cause something to be done. Compel has now<br />

more the sense <strong>of</strong> coercion, <strong>of</strong> constraining someone<br />

to do something which he does not want to<br />

do (The failure <strong>of</strong> the bank compelled them to<br />

retrench severely and to adopt a wholly different<br />

way <strong>of</strong> living). To impel is to urge forward<br />

(The wave behind impelled the wave before)<br />

and in all figurative uses it has the sense <strong>of</strong><br />

constraining or inciting towards a goal (A sense<br />

<strong>of</strong> duty impels me to speak in favor <strong>of</strong> the<br />

measure). Both words may be followed by an<br />

infinitive, as in he compelled her to lead a dreary<br />

life, but not by the -ing form <strong>of</strong> a verb. We<br />

cannot say he compelled her to leading a dreary<br />

life.<br />

compendious means concise, or containing the<br />

substance <strong>of</strong> a subject in brief form (A dictionary<br />

is u compendious work). It is sometimes<br />

misused, perhaps because <strong>of</strong> the similarity <strong>of</strong> its<br />

sound to stupendous and tremendous, to mean<br />

a large book or treatise. A compendious work<br />

may be large or small, but its compendiousness<br />

has nothing to do with its size.<br />

compendium. The plural is compendiums or compendia.<br />

compensate; compensation. To compensate is to<br />

counterbalance, to <strong>of</strong>fset, to make up for. The<br />

application <strong>of</strong> the term to payment for services<br />

rendered was originally a stilted piece <strong>of</strong> elaborate<br />

politeness, a way <strong>of</strong> saying “Of course we<br />

wouldn’t do anything so vulgar as to pay you;<br />

we <strong>of</strong>fer this sum merely to <strong>of</strong>fset the loss <strong>of</strong><br />

your time.” It is like calling a fee an honorarium,<br />

by which it is implied that the one <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

the sum could not hope to pay what the speaker’s<br />

time and wisdom are really worth and is making<br />

merely a token payment. In America the term<br />

compensation has been used so much for wages<br />

or salary that il is now standard in that sense,<br />

with none <strong>of</strong> the connotation <strong>of</strong> making amends<br />

for loss or damage (The salaries <strong>of</strong> American<br />

judges are rather low in comparison with the<br />

compensation <strong>of</strong>fered to judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers in<br />

Europe) that it would have in English usage.<br />

competent; competence. To be competent is to be<br />

properly qualified, to be adequate, to have abilities<br />

sufficient to the purpose. In regard to any<br />

great or difficult undertaking, it is plainly high<br />

praise to be competent; but in critical reviews,<br />

particularly <strong>of</strong> dramatic and musical performances,<br />

where superlatives are the rule, the word<br />

is almost condemnatory, meaning that the performer<br />

had abilities sufficient for the purpose<br />

but nothing more (Smith’s performance was<br />

competent but the applause <strong>of</strong> the evening was<br />

reserved for Jones).<br />

Competent may be followed by an infinitive,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!