19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

intensive pronoun in a that clause is always<br />

placed at the end, as in a man that had seel? it<br />

himself. A man that himself had is contrary to<br />

the literary tradition and contrary to presentday<br />

speech habits.<br />

In current English, a reflexive pronoun. is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten omitted where formerly it would h#ave<br />

been expressed. In the population doubled and<br />

the fog lifted a reflexive itself is understood.<br />

Similafly, a yozzrself is understood in prepare<br />

fo die and don’t bother. We say the child<br />

behaved well although a reflexive was required<br />

here until recently. A reflexive is still required<br />

after some verbs, including perjure. We must<br />

say he perjured himself although with the<br />

present-day meaning <strong>of</strong> this word he could not<br />

possibly perjure anyone else.<br />

At one time the -self words and the personal<br />

pronouns could be used interchangeably.<br />

Today, the -self words are preferred in some<br />

constructions and the personal pronouns in<br />

others.<br />

In older English, personal pronouns were<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten used as reflexives, as in let every soldier<br />

hew him down a bough, I could accuse me <strong>of</strong><br />

such things, and arm you. This is still standLard<br />

English after prepositions showing direction, a.~<br />

in we looked at the stars above us and she drew<br />

it toward her. There is still a tendency to use<br />

personal pronouns as reflexives when the word<br />

is an indirect object, as in I will get me one.<br />

This construction is condemned by many grammarians<br />

and seldom appears in print, but it is<br />

heard frequently in the speech <strong>of</strong> educated<br />

people. A personal pronoun may still be used<br />

reflexively as the object <strong>of</strong> the verb lay, as in<br />

I lay me down at night to dream, but in general<br />

a -self word is required for the true object <strong>of</strong><br />

a verb. We no longer say I will wash me or<br />

I will dress me. A personal pronoun is still very<br />

effective when used as an intensive, as in the<br />

bells they sound so clear. This construction is<br />

condemned by most grammarians on the<br />

grounds that the pronoun is redundant, but the<br />

device is too forceful to be given up, either in<br />

speech or in line writing.<br />

Formerly, the -self words were <strong>of</strong>ten used<br />

non-reflexively, that is, in sentences where they<br />

did not reflect the subject <strong>of</strong> the verb, as yourself<br />

in I am inviting yourself and your wife. In<br />

current English these words have an old<br />

fashioned tone and the personal pronouns, in<br />

this case you, are generally preferred. Myself<br />

is an exception and is still <strong>of</strong>ten used in place<br />

<strong>of</strong> I or me. See myself.<br />

reflexive verbs. A verb is said to be reflexive<br />

when its subject and object represent the same<br />

thing, usually a person, as feed in the baby can<br />

feed himself now. See transitive verbs.<br />

reft. See reave.<br />

refuse. This word may be followed by an intiitive,<br />

as in he refused to see me. It is also hleard<br />

with the -ing form <strong>of</strong> a verb, as in he refused<br />

seeing me, but this is not standard.<br />

refute; confute; deny. To refute is to prove, by<br />

argument or countervailing evidence, that<br />

415 register<br />

something asserted as true is false or erroneous,<br />

to overcome in argument, to prove to be in<br />

error, to show that allegations or charges are<br />

groundless (An insinuation is dificult to refute,<br />

for it rarely makes a specific charge that can be<br />

closely examined). To confute is to prove to be<br />

false, to overthrow by evidence or stronger<br />

argument (Ten yards <strong>of</strong> string and a stone were<br />

suficient to confute the local belief that the<br />

well was bottomless). Confute is confined to<br />

arguments, theories, reasoning, sophistries.<br />

Refute applies to arguments and charges. Both<br />

words, by the way, convey the suggestion <strong>of</strong> a<br />

quick as well as a thorough answer.<br />

Deny is a much weaker term. It simply means<br />

that one asserts that an opinion or a charge is<br />

false or erroneous (He denied the allegation<br />

and defied the alligator). A denial does not<br />

necessarily carry any supporting argument or<br />

evidence; a refutation or a confutation carrks<br />

overwhelming pro<strong>of</strong>.<br />

regal. See kingly.<br />

regard; regards. The singular noun regard is used<br />

in the compound prepositions with regard to, in<br />

regard to, in regard <strong>of</strong>. These all mean “with<br />

reference to” and they are all standard English,<br />

although the last is not used as much today as<br />

formerly. The plural noun regards should never<br />

be used in these phrases.<br />

As regards is a verbal phrase meaning “as<br />

far as it relates to” and the third person singular<br />

form ending in s, regards, should always be<br />

used.<br />

The verb regard cannot be followed by an<br />

infinitive. We cannot say I regard it to be an<br />

honor; nor can we use an objective complement<br />

and say I regard it an honor. Idiom requires<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> as here, as in I regard it as an honor.<br />

The noun regard is properly a mass noun<br />

and does not have a plural form. The plural<br />

regards, like the plural noun respects, is used<br />

only in formal expressions <strong>of</strong> good will, as in<br />

give my regards to your mother.<br />

regarding; respecting; relating; concerning; with<br />

regard to; etc. Many writers will go to great<br />

lengths to avoid using the prepositions about<br />

and on. If all the memoranda beginning Let<br />

me have your comments regarding/ respecting/<br />

relating to/ with regard to . . . were laid end<br />

to end they would reach to a wastebasket on<br />

the moon. See also re; in re.<br />

regimen <strong>of</strong> a preposition. See object <strong>of</strong> a preposition.<br />

register. In its broadest and earliest sense register<br />

is to enter formally in a register (The spaniel’s<br />

pedigree was fully registered). Usage has established<br />

as standard the more specialized sense <strong>of</strong><br />

“record,” that is to indicate by record or to indicate<br />

as records do. From this it was only a<br />

step to “show,” to indicate, as on a scale. And<br />

from this has come the popular figurative<br />

meaning <strong>of</strong> showing emotion as by facial expression<br />

or by action (She registered all<br />

pleasant emotions by smirking and all unpleasant<br />

ones by frowning or pouting). This is<br />

a vague use, which the careful writer will

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!