19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

pied by troops, forf and fortress are interchangeable.<br />

In common usage fortress is applied to<br />

larger forts or groups <strong>of</strong> forts or to the more<br />

heavily armed forts (the great Belgian fortress<br />

<strong>of</strong> Eben Emnel). There is an old joke that fortress<br />

is feminine and hence harder to silence.<br />

The fortified trading posts <strong>of</strong> the West were invariably<br />

called forts and the term survives today<br />

in many American place names. Of the two<br />

words only fortress is used metaphorically (A<br />

mighty fortress is our God).<br />

fortitude. See patience.<br />

fortnight, meaning the space <strong>of</strong> fourteen nights<br />

and days, is in everyday use in England but is<br />

archaic in the United States where two weeks is<br />

used instead (I gef a two weeks’ vacation! early<br />

in September). Fortnight is known in America,<br />

at least to the educated, but is rarely used.<br />

fortuitous. That is fortuitous which is accidental<br />

or happens by chance (This fortuitous encounter<br />

was the cause <strong>of</strong> his death). Some fortuitous<br />

events may be favorable but the word is not a<br />

synonym for fortunate and it is a mistake so to<br />

use it.<br />

forum. The plural is forums or fora.<br />

forward; forwards. Forward is the only form that<br />

can be used to qualify a following noun, :as in a<br />

forward thrust. It is also the only form used in<br />

the two expressions look forward and from that<br />

day forward. It is the preferred form in giving<br />

a command, as in those behind cried “Forward.“’<br />

and those before cried “Back!” Either<br />

form may be used in’any other construcf.on, as<br />

in move forwards and move forward. ln the<br />

United States the form forward is generally preferred.<br />

forward; dispatch; transmit. The use <strong>of</strong> forward<br />

and dispatch as simple synonyms <strong>of</strong> send has<br />

little justification, though it is common in commercial<br />

letters (We regret that a slight debzy will<br />

be necessary, but assure you that the goods will<br />

be forwarded as soon as possible. We have received<br />

your order and will dispatch within the<br />

week, etc.). A letter or package is certainly forwarded<br />

when it is sent ahead to an address at<br />

which the addressee will be and it is forwarded<br />

when it is sent on after him to another address.<br />

Transmit for send is labored elegance unless it<br />

carries the definite idea <strong>of</strong> passing something<br />

through or over an intermediary. Jones transmits<br />

a message or letter from Smith to Robinson.<br />

Though hasten is now an archaic meaning <strong>of</strong><br />

dispatch, the idea <strong>of</strong> haste is still in the word and<br />

it means to send <strong>of</strong>f promptly or quickly, with<br />

some sense <strong>of</strong> urgency.<br />

for your information. If that which follows is<br />

truly informative, the introductory phrarse for<br />

your information weakens its effect. If it is not,<br />

it is simply exasperating. Its use is chiefly ironical.<br />

It serves as a polite expression <strong>of</strong> annoyance<br />

at someone else’s assertiveness.<br />

In inter<strong>of</strong>fice communication, and Such like,<br />

it is <strong>of</strong>ten used to mean “You don’t have to do<br />

anything about this; we’re merely informing<br />

you . . . .” In this use it is an established and<br />

acceptable formula, <strong>of</strong>ten abbreviated to FYI.<br />

187 fractions<br />

fought. See fight.<br />

found. See find.<br />

fowl. The preferred plural is fowls. The singular<br />

form fowl is <strong>of</strong>ten used generically, or collectively,<br />

to mean all <strong>of</strong> them, as in the fowl <strong>of</strong> the<br />

air. It may also be used as a mass word meaning<br />

this kind <strong>of</strong> food, as in they ate fowl all winter.<br />

But only hunters use it as a true plural, as in<br />

several dead fowl.<br />

fraction. The use <strong>of</strong> fraction to mean a small piece,<br />

a remnant (He will recover only a fraction <strong>of</strong><br />

the cost), is over three hundred years old.<br />

Shakespeare so uses it. Troilus in Troilus and<br />

Cressida says bitterly <strong>of</strong> Cressida that The fractions<br />

<strong>of</strong> her faith, orts <strong>of</strong> her love,/ The fragments,<br />

scraps, the bits, and greasy relics/ Of her<br />

o’ereaten faith, are given to Diomed. It is true<br />

that the mathematical senses <strong>of</strong> one or more<br />

aliquot parts <strong>of</strong> a unit, the ratio between any two<br />

numbers, or a ratio <strong>of</strong> algebraic quantities analogous<br />

to the arithmetical vulgar fraction, are<br />

older by several centuries. But three hundred<br />

and fifty years <strong>of</strong> use by the best writers is surely<br />

enough to establish a usage as standard. None<br />

the less, with the spread <strong>of</strong> education the mathematical<br />

meaning has become the dominant one<br />

and those who object to using fraction to mean<br />

a small part (insisting that since 9/lOths is a<br />

fraction, a fraction need not necessarily be a<br />

small fragment) have a somewhat better case<br />

than they had fifty years ago. But still not a<br />

strong enough one, not yet at least, to insist that<br />

this common use <strong>of</strong> the word is an error. Partridge’s<br />

designation <strong>of</strong> it as “infelicitous” is about<br />

as far as anyone can now go.<br />

fractions. With the exception <strong>of</strong> half and quarter,<br />

the second term in a fraction is an ordinal number.<br />

such as third, fourth, fifth. But the fractions<br />

are’not ordinals. They represent quantities. Unlike<br />

the cardinals, they are primarily nouns, but<br />

today, especially in scientific work, they are taking<br />

on the adjective uses characteristic <strong>of</strong> cardinals.<br />

Because a fraction is a noun and represents a<br />

part <strong>of</strong> some whole, it is traditionally joined to<br />

a following noun by <strong>of</strong> and a definitive adjective<br />

(such as a, the, this, my, all), as in one-third <strong>of</strong><br />

the men, three-fifths <strong>of</strong> a mile. In current English<br />

this <strong>of</strong> may be dropped, but not the definitive<br />

adjective, as in one-third the men. This is<br />

more likely to occur with simple fractions, such<br />

as one-third, than with more complicated ones,<br />

but we also say it has nine-tenths the density <strong>of</strong><br />

water. When a pronoun follows a fraction, as in<br />

three-fourths <strong>of</strong> them, the <strong>of</strong> cannot be dropped.<br />

A generation ago the expression two miles<br />

and a quarter was considered finer English than<br />

two and a quarter miles, hecause in the second<br />

form the noun quarter is being used as an adjective.<br />

Today, the second form is generally<br />

preferred. Both are acceptable.<br />

One hyphen is used in a fraction, but not two.<br />

We write one-twentieth but one twenty-fourth.<br />

When fractions are expressed in figures, <strong>of</strong> and<br />

the definitive adjective are dropped and the<br />

following noun is made plural, as in 94 miles.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!