19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sions that are difficult to explain but which are<br />

nevertheless standard English. Let ulone may<br />

mean “not to mention,” as in he Imd never owned<br />

a white mouse, let alone a white elephant. When<br />

an object stands between let and alone, as in let<br />

the cat alone, the compound means “stop annoying.”<br />

The expression let go <strong>of</strong> is impossible to<br />

analyze grammatically, but it is standard English<br />

for “take your hand <strong>of</strong>f.”<br />

Let is also used to form a peculiar imperative<br />

that includes the speaker along with the person<br />

addressed, as in let us be true to one another.<br />

This is sometimes called the first person plural<br />

imperative. In spoken English this let us is usually<br />

contracted to let’s, as in let’s wash the dishes.<br />

The uncontracted form let us is always used<br />

when let is a regular imperative followed by us,<br />

that is, when let us wash the dishes means “allow<br />

us to” and is addressed to somebody not included<br />

in the “us.” This is a valuable distinction<br />

that is made in speech but very <strong>of</strong>ten lost in<br />

print, largely because <strong>of</strong> the mistaken notion<br />

that contractions are undignified.<br />

When let is used as a regular imperative it<br />

cannot be followed by a subjective pronoun.<br />

That is, we say let John and me wash the dishes<br />

and not let John and I wash them. According<br />

to the theoretical rules <strong>of</strong> grammar, the same<br />

thing holds true for the peculiar imperative with<br />

let’s. The contracted us is an objective pronoun<br />

and presumably should be repeated by the objective<br />

me, and not the subjective I, in a sentence<br />

such as let’s you and me wash the dishes. But in<br />

actual practice, the subjective I, as in let’s you<br />

and I wash the dishes, is preferred by many people,<br />

including some <strong>of</strong> our best writers. This<br />

could be defended, academically, on the grounds<br />

that let’s is here merely a sign <strong>of</strong> the imperative,<br />

that the true imperative is wash, and you and Z<br />

its subject. In any case, let’s you and I is heard<br />

too <strong>of</strong>ten not to be called standard. Let’s you<br />

and me is preferred by purists, but both forms<br />

are acceptable.<br />

Us is sometimes used after let’s, as in let’s us<br />

try it out. This construction is not <strong>of</strong>ten seen in<br />

print and is condemned by many grammarians<br />

as redundant, although it is hard to see why us<br />

is any more redundant than you and me.<br />

let the cat out <strong>of</strong> the bag. As a term for disclosing<br />

a secret, usually inadvertently, to let the cat<br />

out <strong>of</strong> the hap is hackneved. The origin <strong>of</strong> the<br />

phrask is uncertain. Some think it may refer to<br />

revealing the fact that a cat had been substituted<br />

for a pig in a sack (pig in a poke), but this is<br />

not established.<br />

liable. In Great Britain liable means subject to or<br />

exposed to some undesirable change or action,<br />

as in the adventure is liable to end sadly and<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the colors are liable to fade. Lord Chesterfield<br />

wrote in 1749: You know, I suppose,<br />

that liable can never be used in a good sense.<br />

But in older English it was used at least in an<br />

indifferent sense and meant subject to any kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> action, good or bad. This usage survives in<br />

the United States and an American might say<br />

we are liable to be in Chicago next week with-<br />

273 libel<br />

out meaning that that would be a calamity.<br />

Liable also has the legal meaning <strong>of</strong> bound by<br />

law or legally answerable for.<br />

Americans who see no reason to question<br />

their own speech habits <strong>of</strong>ten use liable in the<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> likely. This is true <strong>of</strong> many public <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />

and highly respected citizens. Anyone who<br />

wants to use the word in this way is in good<br />

company. But on the other hand, a great many<br />

people know that there is some question about<br />

this word, without knowing what the question is.<br />

These people are likely to think that liable is not<br />

standard, even when it is used in the purest<br />

British manner. Anyone who wants to avoid<br />

giving <strong>of</strong>fense in any quarter will have to avoid<br />

the word entirely, except in its purely legal uses.<br />

liaison; alliance. In military terminology liaison<br />

is the contact maintained between units in order<br />

to ensure concerted action. In cookery liaison is<br />

a thickening for soups, gravies, and so on. In<br />

phonetics it means the running together <strong>of</strong><br />

words in their pronunciation. In personal relationships<br />

it describes an illicit intimacy between<br />

a man and a woman (He [Byron] has a permanent<br />

sort <strong>of</strong> liaison with <strong>Cont</strong>essa Guiccioli).<br />

These are the accepted meanings <strong>of</strong> liaison. It<br />

should not be used to mean any combination or<br />

alliance. An alliance is a regularized connection<br />

entered into for mutual benefit (A marriage is<br />

an alliance, not a liaison. The alliance between<br />

the Western powers and Russia could last only<br />

so long as they were threatened by a common<br />

enemy).<br />

libation; drink. A libation is a pouring out <strong>of</strong><br />

wine or other liquid in honor <strong>of</strong> a deity or th,e<br />

liquid so poured out. The ancient Greeks made<br />

libations to their gods as a part <strong>of</strong> their worship<br />

(Aeschylus’s play, The Libation Bearers, begins<br />

with libations at the grave <strong>of</strong> Agamemnon). The<br />

word is not a synonym for drink and if so used<br />

jocularly is a tedious affectation.<br />

libel; slander; scandal; calumny; defamation. The<br />

blanket term to describe the wrong <strong>of</strong> injuring<br />

another’s reputation without good reason or justification<br />

is defamation. Calumny is a seldom<br />

used term to describe a false and malicious<br />

statement designed to injure someone’s reputation<br />

(Be thou chaste as ice, as pure as snow,<br />

thou shalt not escape calumny).<br />

In the legal sense, libel (from the Latin word<br />

meaning a little book) means defamation by<br />

written or printed words, pictures, or any form<br />

other than spoken words or gestures (When in<br />

Smith’s article Jones was alluded to as a petty<br />

mobster, Jones sued him for libel). Slander<br />

designates defamation by oral utterance (Had it<br />

not been for his senatorial immunity, he would<br />

have fallen afoul the laws <strong>of</strong> slander). In popular<br />

speech libel and slander are used synonymously<br />

for defamation, though libel usually<br />

implies a somewhat more serious charge. It is<br />

best, however, to keep the legal distinction between<br />

the two words in mind.<br />

Scandal, in so far as it is synonymous with<br />

libel and slander, means defamatory talk or malicious<br />

gossip. But it is a milder word than the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!