19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Morpheus 306<br />

mean a stupid person (Any moron would know<br />

enough not to give his right name) and has become<br />

a term in the more sensational newspapers<br />

for a sex pervert (Moron strikes again. Removing<br />

shrubbery and lagoons will not improve the<br />

morals <strong>of</strong> a moron). This last use is not standard<br />

and should be discouraged if only because it<br />

helps to obscure a serious social problem.<br />

Morpheus, in the arms <strong>of</strong>. To refer to being<br />

asleep as being in the arms <strong>of</strong> Morpheus is to<br />

employ a strained and tedious expression. It is a<br />

pedantic observation, though the affectation <strong>of</strong><br />

the usual reference to Morpheus justifies it, but<br />

Morpheus was not the god <strong>of</strong> sleep. He was the<br />

shaper <strong>of</strong> dreams. His father, Hypnos, was the<br />

god <strong>of</strong> sleep.<br />

mortal. In addition to its standard meanings <strong>of</strong><br />

liable to death or pertaining to man as subject to<br />

death or pertaining to death or to this world,<br />

mortal has a number <strong>of</strong> meanings in America,<br />

none <strong>of</strong> which are found in literary English. It<br />

means long and wearisome (She held me there<br />

three mortal hours, going into the details <strong>of</strong> her<br />

various ailments), great (He was in a mortal<br />

hurry), and possible or conceivable (The thing<br />

was <strong>of</strong> no mortal rrse). The last <strong>of</strong> these is probably<br />

an extension <strong>of</strong> its standard meaning <strong>of</strong><br />

“related to this world in which all living things<br />

are mortal.” That is, “It is <strong>of</strong> no use in this<br />

world.”<br />

Moses, as meek as. We don’t hear As meek as<br />

Moses as much as we used to, but the conservative<br />

force <strong>of</strong> alliteration still keeps it alive.<br />

The phrase is a cliche and seemingly a contradiction.<br />

We are assured in Numbers 12:3 that<br />

the man Moses was very meek, above all the<br />

men which were upon the face <strong>of</strong> the earth. But<br />

his actions hardly bear this out. He killed the<br />

Egyptian taskmaster, he destroyed Pharaoh’s<br />

host. he smashed the tablets <strong>of</strong> the Ten Commandments,<br />

he literally forced the golden calf<br />

down the throats <strong>of</strong> the backsliders, he instigated<br />

the slaying <strong>of</strong> about three thousand Israelites<br />

as a disciplinary measure and smote the<br />

rock which God had commanded him merely to<br />

speak to.<br />

All <strong>of</strong> this may indicate a vigor <strong>of</strong> character<br />

inseparable from his powers <strong>of</strong> leadership but it<br />

doesn’t accord with any known definition <strong>of</strong><br />

meekness. The commentators have striven manfully<br />

with the passage, though their task has been<br />

the more difficult in that until quite recently it<br />

was assumed that Moses himself had written it<br />

and it is hard to reconcile the possession <strong>of</strong><br />

meekness with so unequivocal a declaration <strong>of</strong><br />

it. The Bishops and Clergy <strong>of</strong> the Anglican<br />

Church (in 1888) saw in Moses’ account <strong>of</strong> his<br />

own humility “the simplicity <strong>of</strong> one who bears<br />

witness <strong>of</strong> himself” and felt that his engaging<br />

frankness in the matter “especially manifested<br />

the direction <strong>of</strong> the Holv Spirit.” Weedon<br />

felt that since this particular virtue <strong>of</strong> the prophet’s<br />

might otherwise have escaped our attention<br />

we had cause to be grateful to him for setting<br />

false modesty aside and pointing it out to us.<br />

The Cambridge Bible sought to resolve the<br />

difficulty by suggesting that meek was here to be<br />

understood in the sense <strong>of</strong> “pious,” though they<br />

admitted that the suggestion <strong>of</strong>fered “serious<br />

difficulty,” not the least <strong>of</strong> which was that no<br />

dictionary recognized any such sense.<br />

Then in 1941, speaking before the annual<br />

meeting <strong>of</strong> the Oriental Society, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor 0.<br />

R. Sellers, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Old Testament at the<br />

Presbyterian Theological Seminary in Chicago,<br />

pointed out that meek was a mistranslation <strong>of</strong><br />

the Hebrew word that would be better rendered<br />

as vexed, put out, or irritable.<br />

most; mostly. Most is the superlative form <strong>of</strong> the<br />

words much and many.<br />

The adjective most may mean greatest in<br />

amount and qualify a singular noun, as in the<br />

most power. It may also mean greatest in number<br />

or nearly all and qualify a plural noun, as in<br />

most men. It may be used in both senses as if<br />

it were a noun, as in the most he could give was<br />

ten dollars and most <strong>of</strong> his friends are awav. In<br />

England the article the is no longer used before<br />

most when it has a plural sense and the use <strong>of</strong><br />

the in a construction <strong>of</strong> this kind is considered a<br />

Scotch idiom. In the United States the is not<br />

used when most means nearly all but it is still<br />

used when most means the greatest number, as<br />

in the most were on my side.<br />

The suffix -most is added to certain nouns and<br />

adjectives to form superlative adjectives indicating<br />

position, as in topmost, bottommost, furthermost,<br />

innermost.<br />

Most is also used as an adverb and means to<br />

the greatest extent or in the highest degree, as<br />

in he works most. It may be used before an<br />

adjective or adverb to make what is equivalent<br />

to a superlative form, as in most extraordinary,<br />

most quickly. (See comparison <strong>of</strong> adjectives<br />

and adverbs.) It may also be used in this position<br />

as a pure intensive, or a stronger form <strong>of</strong><br />

very, as in it was most convincing and a most<br />

wholesome meal. It always has this intensive<br />

force when it follows the article a rather than<br />

the article the.<br />

In standard English most is not used freely as<br />

an adverb with the meaning <strong>of</strong> nearly or almost.<br />

It cannot be used in this sense to qualify a verb,<br />

as in he most won, or before the article the, as<br />

in he is most the richest man I know. But it is<br />

used in this sense to qualify the adjective-pronouns<br />

all, everyone, everybody, anyone, anybody,<br />

and the one adverb always, as in most anyone<br />

would say and we most always go shopping<br />

on Saturday. Some grammarians claim that most<br />

used in the sense <strong>of</strong> almost is always unacceptable.<br />

But there is no doubt that these forms are<br />

acceptable spoken English in the United States.<br />

They are heard everywhere. And there is no<br />

theoretical, or grammatical, reason why most<br />

should not be used in this way.<br />

The adverb mostly could once be used interchangeably<br />

with the adverb most. The two words<br />

may still be used in the same positions but they<br />

now mean different things. Mostly means in the<br />

main or on the whole, as in their homes are<br />

mostly shabby. The adverb most, on the other

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!