19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IlO 320<br />

no man and no men. A singular noun qualified<br />

by no requires a singular verb, as in no man<br />

knows, and a plural noun a plural verb, as in<br />

no birds sing. The adjective no cannot be used<br />

alone as a noun or pronoun; the form for this<br />

is none.<br />

As a rule, the adjective no makes an entire<br />

statement negative. That is, no great man would<br />

say that is equivalent to a great man would not<br />

say that. For this reason, a noun can <strong>of</strong>ten be<br />

qualified by no when what is meant is the verb<br />

qualified by not, as in I was troubled by no<br />

doubt and you need have no fear. But this is<br />

not always true. No little usually means much<br />

and no few, many, as in it added no little to<br />

his happiness and tender dreams, no few <strong>of</strong><br />

which have since been realized.<br />

No may be used as an adverb to qualify<br />

other, diRerent, and the comparative forms <strong>of</strong><br />

adjectives and adverbs, as in if is no different<br />

and Z will waif no longer. (The rest <strong>of</strong> this paragraph<br />

involves some hair-splitting. It should not<br />

be read except by those who enjoy this sort <strong>of</strong><br />

thing.) Some grammarians feel that no is also<br />

used as an adverb with the positive form <strong>of</strong><br />

certain adjectives, as in at no inconsiderable<br />

yearly loss. Here, if no qualifies only the word<br />

that -immediately follows, that is, inconsiderable.<br />

it is an adverb. If it aualifies all the words<br />

that’ follow, including the noun, that is, if it<br />

qualifies inconsiderable yearly loss, it is an adjective.<br />

To say which <strong>of</strong> these interpretations is<br />

the better one requires a subtle feeling for the<br />

meaning <strong>of</strong> words. But anyone who can see the<br />

problem has a right to his own conclusions. If<br />

no is an adverb here it may be preceded by a<br />

definitive word, as in at the no inconsiderable<br />

or at my no inconsiderable. If it is an adjective<br />

it cannot be used after a word <strong>of</strong> this kind<br />

because no is itself a definitive. Some grammarians<br />

say that no is here an adjective and<br />

that therefore the construction with the, my, or<br />

any other definitive word, is ungrammatical.<br />

Others say that the fact that this construction<br />

is used proves that no is here an adverb.<br />

No may be used to answer a question, as in<br />

Did you hear that? No.: or to introduce a negative<br />

statement, as in No, Z don’t. In these uses<br />

<strong>of</strong> the word, no is interpreted as an adverb<br />

aualifvinr a verb. This adverbial no may be<br />

.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!