19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The word way is sometimes used without the<br />

article a to mean “far <strong>of</strong>f ,” as in way down upon<br />

the Swanee river. This is a Scottish idiom. It is<br />

acceptable in the United States but not in England,<br />

where away is required, as in away down<br />

the river, a hundred miles or more.<br />

The sutlix -ways (but not the sufTix -way) may<br />

be added to a noun to show direction, as in edgeways,<br />

endways, sideways. Both forms, -way and<br />

-ways, are used in adverbs <strong>of</strong> manner, as in nnyway<br />

and anyways. Some grammarians hold that<br />

words expressing manner should not have the s<br />

ending, but should be anyway, someway, and so<br />

on. This restriction is not observed in literary<br />

English, but the forms without s are generally<br />

preferred in the United States today.<br />

wny; weigh. Under way is the correct expression<br />

to mean in motion, or moving along, as a ship<br />

that has weighed anchor and is moving on her<br />

course (We got under way at midnight and by<br />

sunrise were in position to bombard the coastal<br />

defenses). Weigh, when applied to an anchor,<br />

has the highly specialized meaning <strong>of</strong> to lift or<br />

raise. Many people use under weigh, being apparently<br />

<strong>of</strong> the impression that it has something<br />

to do with weighing anchor. But while a ship<br />

cannot be under way until she has weighed<br />

anchor, she may weigh anchor and yet not get<br />

under way. The term is no less incorrect when<br />

used figuratively (as in Now that he had a<br />

project under weigh his spirits rose).<br />

we. The word I does not actually have a plural.<br />

We means “I and others” rather than “more<br />

than one I.” Who the others are is sometimes<br />

vague. When necessary we can make it specific<br />

by adding words, as in we the people or we here<br />

present.<br />

We is sometimes used to mean a single individual.<br />

One form <strong>of</strong> this is called the modest we.<br />

Here a person uses a plural form in order not to<br />

call attention to himself as an individual. This<br />

device is sometimes silly, but it is very old and<br />

is found even in classical Latin.<br />

There is also a royal we. At one period in<br />

history the Roman empire was governed by two<br />

or three men who ruled together and issued joint<br />

proclamations, using a plural form. Later, smaller<br />

rulers used the same form because they were<br />

speaking for themselves and a body <strong>of</strong> advisors.<br />

In this way the plural became associated with<br />

the highest authority and was eventually used by<br />

single, independent rulers as a sign <strong>of</strong> royalty.<br />

In English the old form ourselj, and not the<br />

modern plural form ourselves, is used in referring<br />

to a royal we, as in we will ourselj take time<br />

to hear your cause.<br />

The editorial we is <strong>of</strong>ten a true plural. That is,<br />

a writer <strong>of</strong>ten uses we to mean himself and his<br />

associates or himself and his readers. When he<br />

does, he will also use the plural form ourselves,<br />

as in we ourselves believe. When the form ourself<br />

is used here, as in we oztrselj believe, the<br />

editorial we slides into the royal we and becomes<br />

pompous.<br />

Finally, there is a we that is only used in<br />

speaking to very young children or adults who<br />

weasel<br />

are sick. Here we actually means you, as in how<br />

are we feeling today? and can’t we operz our<br />

mouth a little wider? This might be called the<br />

patronizing we, or the humiliating we.<br />

For when to use we rather than us, see snbjective<br />

pronouns.<br />

weak verbs. See strong verbs.<br />

weaker sex. To refer to women as the weaker sex<br />

is to employ a tedious -and questionablebanality.<br />

weakness. See fault.<br />

weal. See wale.<br />

wealthy. See rich.<br />

wear. The past tense is wore. The participle is<br />

worn. A participle wore, as in had wore, is heard<br />

but is standard only as a term in sailing, where<br />

it means a particular way <strong>of</strong> bringing a ship<br />

about.<br />

Wear may be followed by an adjective describing<br />

what wears, as in it wore thin. It may<br />

also be followed by an adverb describing the<br />

wearing, as in it wore well.<br />

wear and tear, especially when used as a mere<br />

intensive for wear, is hackneyed.<br />

wear one’s heart upon one’s sleeve. As a term<br />

for making an ingenuous display <strong>of</strong> one’s feelings<br />

and hence, one’s affections being known, to<br />

be vulnerable to slights and scorns, to wear one’s<br />

heart upon one’s sleeve is a clich& The expression<br />

is taken from one <strong>of</strong> Iago’s early speeches<br />

in Othello when, boasting to the gullible Roderigo,<br />

he says that he is not what for his own<br />

purposes he seems to be, For when my outward<br />

action doth demonstrate/ The native act arzd<br />

figure <strong>of</strong> my heart/ In compliment extern, ‘tis<br />

not long after/ Bzct I will wear my heart upon<br />

my sleeve/ For daws to peck at.<br />

wearied; weary; wearisome. Weary is now simply<br />

a synonym for tired. It is slightly bookish. Wearied<br />

still retains a little <strong>of</strong> the older idea <strong>of</strong> being<br />

exhausted with exertion, worn out <strong>of</strong> strength or<br />

patience. Wearisome has now almost exclusively<br />

the sense <strong>of</strong> “tedious.” See also tired.<br />

weasel. Figurative uses <strong>of</strong> weasel are apparent11<br />

an American phenomenon. A weasel is a cunning,<br />

sneaking fellow who models his behavior<br />

on the sinuous animal. Weasel words mean intentionally<br />

ambiguous statements. The image is<br />

not, as commonly assumed, <strong>of</strong> words that can<br />

glide, as a weasel glides, out <strong>of</strong> their seeming<br />

meaning. It is a better figure than that. It is<br />

based on the weasel’s habit <strong>of</strong> sucking eggs. And<br />

a weasel word is one which, by equivocal qualification,<br />

sucks all the real meaning out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

word to which the hearer or reader has attached<br />

significance. The phrase seems to have been<br />

coined by Stewart Chaplin in an article in<br />

Century Magazine in 1900 and popularized by<br />

Theodore Roosevelt in a speech delivered at St.<br />

Louis in 1916. Roosevelt said, “One <strong>of</strong> our defects<br />

as a nation is a tendency to use what have<br />

been called ‘weasel words.’ When a weasel sucks<br />

an egg, the meat is sucked out <strong>of</strong> the egg; and<br />

if you use a ‘weasel word’ after another there is<br />

nothing left <strong>of</strong> the other.”<br />

Weasel is used colloquially as a verb, mean-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!