A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
and imply only a furthering or seconding <strong>of</strong><br />
another’s efforts. Aid implies a more active helping<br />
than assist which suggests not only less help<br />
but also less need for help (aided and comforted<br />
the enemy;. . .my wife, without whose assistance<br />
this book would never have been published).<br />
Succor derives from a word meaning to<br />
run under, and there is still in it a sense <strong>of</strong><br />
bringing aid, <strong>of</strong> coming to the relief <strong>of</strong>. This is<br />
especially so in military contexts where beleaguered<br />
cities or isolated detachments <strong>of</strong><br />
troops are succored or succor is brought to<br />
them. Succor is a more emotional word than<br />
help or assisf. It suggests not only aid but comfort.<br />
Except in the military sense, it is, however,<br />
slightly bookish.<br />
help; servant. In the sense <strong>of</strong> a domestic servant<br />
or a farm laborer, help has been used in<br />
America, at least in New England, since earliest<br />
times (James Penn shall have 2Os, to be disposed<br />
among such <strong>of</strong> his servants & helps . . . .<br />
He has always had good help on his farm: he<br />
treats them right. In Indiana and Illinois, where<br />
white servants were employed, they would not<br />
tolerate being called servants. They were known<br />
us “the help”). It is now applied to hired laborers,<br />
especially those whose work does not<br />
require any special skills (Help wanted. He<br />
laid 08 half his help). While servant, as applied<br />
to employment in the service <strong>of</strong> a private individual<br />
or organization, is generally regarded as<br />
an undemocratic word, a person in the government<br />
can be called a servant without <strong>of</strong>fense<br />
(a faithful civil servant).<br />
helping hand. The helping hand, especially when<br />
lent, is a clich6.<br />
helpmate; helpmeet. In the second chapter <strong>of</strong><br />
Genesis, according to the King James version,<br />
God said that it was not good that Adam should<br />
be alone and that He would make him an help<br />
meet for him-that is a helper suitable for him.<br />
Wycliffe had translated the phrase an helper like<br />
hym and Coverdale an helpe, to beare him<br />
company. The Revised Standard Version has a<br />
helper fit for him. In the seventeenth century<br />
help and meet, for some reason, were taken to<br />
be one word and since Adam’s fit helper turned<br />
out to be Eve, his wife, the new compound was<br />
applied to a wife or husband, usually to a wife<br />
(A true helpmeet for him, young, beautiful,<br />
rich, and withal virtuous). In the eighteenth<br />
century meet and mate were <strong>of</strong>ten pronounced<br />
alike (as they are in Ireland today) and the<br />
absurd coinage was soon given a semblance <strong>of</strong><br />
sense by being spelled helpmate, though the<br />
older spelling persisted alongside the new one<br />
and is still in use even today, especially among<br />
those who like to be quaintly learned. Both<br />
words are a little affected and bookish.<br />
hemlock. In England hemlock designates a poisonous<br />
umbelliferous herb, Conicum maculatum<br />
(Round about the caldron go;/ In the poison’d<br />
entrails throw, . . ./ Root <strong>of</strong> hemlock digg’d i<br />
the dark). It also designates a poisonous drink<br />
made from this herb (Socrates drinking the<br />
hemlock,/ And Jesus on the rood). In the<br />
219 herself<br />
United States hemlock chiefly designates an<br />
evergreen tree <strong>of</strong> the genus Tsuga, the hemlock<br />
spruce (This is the forest primeval. The murmuring<br />
pines and the hemlocks,/ . . ./ Stand<br />
like Druids <strong>of</strong> old). The early Americans made<br />
a drink from this spruce which they called hemlock<br />
tea. John Galt in his Lawrie Todd (1830)<br />
refers to it as “a pleasant and salutary drink.”<br />
her; hers. Her is one <strong>of</strong> the objective pronouns.<br />
It is used after a verb or a preposition in place<br />
<strong>of</strong> the word she, as in have you seen her? and<br />
did you talk with her? (See objective pronouns.)<br />
Her is also used as a possessive in place <strong>of</strong> the<br />
word hers. In this sense, the form her is required<br />
when the word qualifies a following noun, as<br />
in her home, her money, and the form hers is<br />
required in any other construction, as in have<br />
you seen hers? and compare this with hers. Hers<br />
is the form used in a double possessive where<br />
the word is separated from its following noun<br />
by and, as in hers and Sophia’s bedroom. Today,<br />
this construction is generally avoided. We are<br />
more likely to say her bedroom and Sophia’s or<br />
her own and Sophia’s bedroom. Neither word<br />
order shows clearly whether we are talking<br />
about one thing or two, but the old-fashioned<br />
form, hers and Sophia’s, suggests one thing<br />
possessed in common more strongly than the<br />
forms which use her. In current English the<br />
word hers is never written with an apostrophe.<br />
here. The adverb here cannot qualify a following<br />
noun, as in this here pencil, because too many<br />
teacher-hours have been devoted to saying that<br />
it couldn’t. If anyone uses this construction we<br />
know at once that either he never went to school<br />
a day in his life, or he is dangerously selfassertive.<br />
The trouble is not that here repeats the idea<br />
<strong>of</strong> this, but that it is an adverb standing in the<br />
adjective position. This player here is the purest<br />
English. A few words that are primarily adverbs<br />
have won the right to stand before a noun, as<br />
in the after life, the above remarks, but here is<br />
not likely to become one <strong>of</strong> them. See hither.<br />
hereabout; hereabouts. These forms are equally<br />
acceptable today, and have been for several<br />
centuries. Some grammarians claim that hereabouts<br />
ought to be the preferred form, because<br />
the word is used to qualify a verb and s is a<br />
formal adverbial ending. But there is no evidence<br />
that it actually is preferred.<br />
hem (pronoun) was once acceptable English, but<br />
it has not been used in the literary language for<br />
three hundred years. The only acceptable form<br />
today is hers.<br />
hernia. The plural is hernias or herniae.<br />
hero. The plural is heroes.<br />
heroics. This word is always treated as a plural<br />
and is usually meant derisively, as in these<br />
heroics are wasted on me. The adjectives heroic<br />
and heroical do not carry this sense but belong<br />
to the solemn word hero. Both forms <strong>of</strong> the<br />
adjective are acceptable, but heroic is heard<br />
more <strong>of</strong>ten.<br />
herself. In Ireland this word is sometimes used in<br />
place <strong>of</strong> the word her or she, as in YOII must ask