19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

go through with the encounter to which he was<br />

committed. The expression is used to mean this<br />

today but is also used loosely to mean up to<br />

normal, doing as well as could be expected. In<br />

either sense it is hackneyed.<br />

up to the hilt. A dagger plunged into someone’s<br />

body up to the hilt was, plainly, in as deep as it<br />

could go. But one may be deeply involved in<br />

many things <strong>of</strong> such a nature or in such a way<br />

that the phrase is ludicrous. And, in any event,<br />

it is a clich6.<br />

upper; upmost. See up.<br />

upset t6e applecart. The Romans had a saying<br />

You’ve upset the cart, meaning “You’ve ruined<br />

everything.” What genius in the eighteenth century<br />

thought <strong>of</strong> making it an applecart will now<br />

never be known, but it was one <strong>of</strong> those additions<br />

to a homely phrase (like Shakespeare’s “son<br />

and heir <strong>of</strong> a mongrel bitch”) that surprised<br />

with a fine excess and caught the popular fancy<br />

at once. Unfortunately the humorous vigor and<br />

vividness <strong>of</strong> the amended expression had too<br />

wide an appeal. It was soon overworked and is<br />

now exhausted.<br />

upward; upwards. Upward is the only form that<br />

can be used to qualify a following noun, as in<br />

nn upward movement. Either form may be used<br />

in any other construction, as in he looked upwards<br />

and he looked upward. The form upward<br />

is generally preferred in the United States.<br />

Both forms, upwards and upward, may be used<br />

to mean “more than,” as in upwards <strong>of</strong> five hundred<br />

people and upward <strong>of</strong> twenty years.<br />

urbane.. See polite.<br />

urge. This verb mav be followed bv an infinitive.<br />

as in I urged him-to go, or by the-ing form <strong>of</strong> a<br />

verb, as in I urged his going. It may also be followed<br />

by a clause but the clause verb must be a<br />

subjunctive or a subjunctive equivalent, as in I<br />

urged that he go. The infinitive construction is<br />

generally preferred.<br />

us. See objective pronouns.<br />

use; utilize; exploit; work. Use is the everyday<br />

word for making something serve one’s purposes<br />

(Use your eyes, child! It’s right there in front <strong>of</strong><br />

you!). When applied to persons, it has a selfish<br />

and even sinister connotation (He’s only using<br />

you). It would be more tactful, for example, to<br />

say, I could use your help this afternoon than to<br />

say, I could use you this afternoon; though where<br />

the relationship is friendly the second wording<br />

would be accepted as a mere shortening <strong>of</strong> the<br />

first. The use <strong>of</strong> used as a commercial euphemism<br />

for second-hand or worn has given it a<br />

depreciatory meaning.<br />

Utilize implies a practical or pr<strong>of</strong>itable use<br />

and, in its stricter sense, making a practical or<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>itable use <strong>of</strong> something when something else<br />

more desirable is not available C Well. vou’ll iust<br />

have to utilize what’s there. Such &s <strong>of</strong>-the<br />

tongue are <strong>of</strong>ten utilized by unscrupulous men<br />

when they luck anything definite to charge their<br />

opponents with).<br />

To exploit is to turn to practical account, to<br />

use for pr<strong>of</strong>it (He exploited the concession to the<br />

533 used to<br />

last penny). It <strong>of</strong>ten means-and when applied<br />

to persons invariably means-to use selfishly for<br />

one’s own ends (They have exploited that child<br />

mercilessly).<br />

To work, as a transitive verb, in its serious<br />

senses, is to expend labor upon (He worked the<br />

soil. If the clay is worked in the hands it will<br />

soon become s<strong>of</strong>t and malleable). In loose speech<br />

it is <strong>of</strong>ten used as a synonym for exploit and<br />

utilize in their pejorative senses (She’s been<br />

working him for forty years).<br />

use; usage. Use is the act <strong>of</strong> employment or<br />

putting into service (Have you any use for a<br />

good set <strong>of</strong> matched irons?). Usage means either<br />

a manner <strong>of</strong> use-<strong>of</strong>ten, in a derogatory sense,<br />

rough and therefore somewhat damaging use<br />

(These tools have had hard usage, friend: I can’t<br />

give you much for them), or a habitual practice<br />

which has served to create a standard, especially<br />

in matters <strong>of</strong> language and the meanings <strong>of</strong><br />

words (A <strong>Dictionary</strong> <strong>of</strong> Modern English Usage).<br />

It is in this last sense that the word usage is<br />

employed in this volume.<br />

used to. The verb use, meaning to make use <strong>of</strong>,<br />

is perfectly regular with a past tense and participle<br />

used, as in I used it yesterday. It is never<br />

followed by a verb form and presents no problems.<br />

The expression used to means something quite<br />

different. When it is combined with a form <strong>of</strong><br />

the verb be it is followed by the -ing form <strong>of</strong> a<br />

verb, as in he was used to sleeping late, and<br />

means accustomed to or familiar with. In any<br />

other construction used to is followed by the<br />

simple form <strong>of</strong> a verb (or we might say used is<br />

followed by a to-infinitive), as in he used to sleep<br />

lute. Here it means “habitually did, at some unspecified<br />

time in the past.” Would may also be<br />

used to express habitual action, but with would<br />

the time at which the action was habitual must<br />

be specified. We may say I used to get up early,<br />

but if would is used there must he some specifying<br />

clause, such as when I was a child I would<br />

get up early. Would in this construction suggests<br />

endless repetition more strongly than used to<br />

does and is a more literary form. When used in<br />

ordinary speech it gives the impression that the<br />

speaker is composing his memoirs rather than<br />

giving a factual account <strong>of</strong> the past. Would cannot<br />

be used in this sense with a verb that does<br />

not imply action. We can say I used to like<br />

chocolate but not when I was a child I would<br />

like chocolate.<br />

In speech the d <strong>of</strong> used merges with the t <strong>of</strong><br />

to and the two words are always pronounced<br />

use to. But in the United States the form use to<br />

never appears in print except after the verb did,<br />

and there it is required.<br />

In the United States, questions and negative<br />

statements involving used to require the word<br />

did, as in did there use to be owls here?, he didn’t<br />

use to drink, didn’t you use to like her?. In Great<br />

Britain, the auxiliary did is never used and<br />

these American constructions are generally condemned.<br />

Englishmen say used there to be owls

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!