A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
go through with the encounter to which he was<br />
committed. The expression is used to mean this<br />
today but is also used loosely to mean up to<br />
normal, doing as well as could be expected. In<br />
either sense it is hackneyed.<br />
up to the hilt. A dagger plunged into someone’s<br />
body up to the hilt was, plainly, in as deep as it<br />
could go. But one may be deeply involved in<br />
many things <strong>of</strong> such a nature or in such a way<br />
that the phrase is ludicrous. And, in any event,<br />
it is a clich6.<br />
upper; upmost. See up.<br />
upset t6e applecart. The Romans had a saying<br />
You’ve upset the cart, meaning “You’ve ruined<br />
everything.” What genius in the eighteenth century<br />
thought <strong>of</strong> making it an applecart will now<br />
never be known, but it was one <strong>of</strong> those additions<br />
to a homely phrase (like Shakespeare’s “son<br />
and heir <strong>of</strong> a mongrel bitch”) that surprised<br />
with a fine excess and caught the popular fancy<br />
at once. Unfortunately the humorous vigor and<br />
vividness <strong>of</strong> the amended expression had too<br />
wide an appeal. It was soon overworked and is<br />
now exhausted.<br />
upward; upwards. Upward is the only form that<br />
can be used to qualify a following noun, as in<br />
nn upward movement. Either form may be used<br />
in any other construction, as in he looked upwards<br />
and he looked upward. The form upward<br />
is generally preferred in the United States.<br />
Both forms, upwards and upward, may be used<br />
to mean “more than,” as in upwards <strong>of</strong> five hundred<br />
people and upward <strong>of</strong> twenty years.<br />
urbane.. See polite.<br />
urge. This verb mav be followed bv an infinitive.<br />
as in I urged him-to go, or by the-ing form <strong>of</strong> a<br />
verb, as in I urged his going. It may also be followed<br />
by a clause but the clause verb must be a<br />
subjunctive or a subjunctive equivalent, as in I<br />
urged that he go. The infinitive construction is<br />
generally preferred.<br />
us. See objective pronouns.<br />
use; utilize; exploit; work. Use is the everyday<br />
word for making something serve one’s purposes<br />
(Use your eyes, child! It’s right there in front <strong>of</strong><br />
you!). When applied to persons, it has a selfish<br />
and even sinister connotation (He’s only using<br />
you). It would be more tactful, for example, to<br />
say, I could use your help this afternoon than to<br />
say, I could use you this afternoon; though where<br />
the relationship is friendly the second wording<br />
would be accepted as a mere shortening <strong>of</strong> the<br />
first. The use <strong>of</strong> used as a commercial euphemism<br />
for second-hand or worn has given it a<br />
depreciatory meaning.<br />
Utilize implies a practical or pr<strong>of</strong>itable use<br />
and, in its stricter sense, making a practical or<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itable use <strong>of</strong> something when something else<br />
more desirable is not available C Well. vou’ll iust<br />
have to utilize what’s there. Such &s <strong>of</strong>-the<br />
tongue are <strong>of</strong>ten utilized by unscrupulous men<br />
when they luck anything definite to charge their<br />
opponents with).<br />
To exploit is to turn to practical account, to<br />
use for pr<strong>of</strong>it (He exploited the concession to the<br />
533 used to<br />
last penny). It <strong>of</strong>ten means-and when applied<br />
to persons invariably means-to use selfishly for<br />
one’s own ends (They have exploited that child<br />
mercilessly).<br />
To work, as a transitive verb, in its serious<br />
senses, is to expend labor upon (He worked the<br />
soil. If the clay is worked in the hands it will<br />
soon become s<strong>of</strong>t and malleable). In loose speech<br />
it is <strong>of</strong>ten used as a synonym for exploit and<br />
utilize in their pejorative senses (She’s been<br />
working him for forty years).<br />
use; usage. Use is the act <strong>of</strong> employment or<br />
putting into service (Have you any use for a<br />
good set <strong>of</strong> matched irons?). Usage means either<br />
a manner <strong>of</strong> use-<strong>of</strong>ten, in a derogatory sense,<br />
rough and therefore somewhat damaging use<br />
(These tools have had hard usage, friend: I can’t<br />
give you much for them), or a habitual practice<br />
which has served to create a standard, especially<br />
in matters <strong>of</strong> language and the meanings <strong>of</strong><br />
words (A <strong>Dictionary</strong> <strong>of</strong> Modern English Usage).<br />
It is in this last sense that the word usage is<br />
employed in this volume.<br />
used to. The verb use, meaning to make use <strong>of</strong>,<br />
is perfectly regular with a past tense and participle<br />
used, as in I used it yesterday. It is never<br />
followed by a verb form and presents no problems.<br />
The expression used to means something quite<br />
different. When it is combined with a form <strong>of</strong><br />
the verb be it is followed by the -ing form <strong>of</strong> a<br />
verb, as in he was used to sleeping late, and<br />
means accustomed to or familiar with. In any<br />
other construction used to is followed by the<br />
simple form <strong>of</strong> a verb (or we might say used is<br />
followed by a to-infinitive), as in he used to sleep<br />
lute. Here it means “habitually did, at some unspecified<br />
time in the past.” Would may also be<br />
used to express habitual action, but with would<br />
the time at which the action was habitual must<br />
be specified. We may say I used to get up early,<br />
but if would is used there must he some specifying<br />
clause, such as when I was a child I would<br />
get up early. Would in this construction suggests<br />
endless repetition more strongly than used to<br />
does and is a more literary form. When used in<br />
ordinary speech it gives the impression that the<br />
speaker is composing his memoirs rather than<br />
giving a factual account <strong>of</strong> the past. Would cannot<br />
be used in this sense with a verb that does<br />
not imply action. We can say I used to like<br />
chocolate but not when I was a child I would<br />
like chocolate.<br />
In speech the d <strong>of</strong> used merges with the t <strong>of</strong><br />
to and the two words are always pronounced<br />
use to. But in the United States the form use to<br />
never appears in print except after the verb did,<br />
and there it is required.<br />
In the United States, questions and negative<br />
statements involving used to require the word<br />
did, as in did there use to be owls here?, he didn’t<br />
use to drink, didn’t you use to like her?. In Great<br />
Britain, the auxiliary did is never used and<br />
these American constructions are generally condemned.<br />
Englishmen say used there to be owls