19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

adjectives 14<br />

way, as burning hot, howling drunk. We may<br />

still say dead tired and dead certain. Some<br />

words <strong>of</strong> this kind are now in use but are<br />

under attack, such as mighty fine, real clever,<br />

awful nice, right smart, sure good. Whether<br />

they remain standard English or not will depend<br />

on who uses them and who doesn’t. There is no<br />

question <strong>of</strong> logic, or <strong>of</strong> grammatical principles,<br />

involved. If the respected members <strong>of</strong> the community<br />

use these words, the words are respectable,<br />

and if they do not, the words are not.<br />

(See the individual words.)<br />

adjectives as nouns. Nouns may be made from<br />

adjectives, or adjectives may be used as if they<br />

were nouns. Both kinds <strong>of</strong> words can be seen<br />

in the sentence by Fielding, we moderns are to<br />

the ancients what the poor are to the rich. The<br />

words moderns and ancients are made from<br />

adjectives but they are true nouns, if only<br />

because they have been given the ending s<br />

which does not belong to the adjective. A<br />

great many nouns are formed from adjectives<br />

in this way, such as news, slacks, heroics,<br />

economics. In the case. <strong>of</strong> moderns and ancients<br />

the words also have a singular form and the<br />

plural form can be used with a numeral, as in<br />

any modern is worth a hundred ancients. Words<br />

that have both a singular and a plural form<br />

are nouns. Words that have been formed from<br />

adjectives by adding s are also nouns, even<br />

when they do not have the two forms. Neither<br />

<strong>of</strong> these things is true <strong>of</strong> the words rich and<br />

poor. They have the simple form <strong>of</strong> the adjective.<br />

And we cannot speak <strong>of</strong> an individual<br />

one or use the words with a number term<br />

unless we supply the missing noun man, as in<br />

this poor man and three rich men. Adjectives<br />

that appear to be nouns because the noun they<br />

qualify is not expressed are said to be “adjectives<br />

used absolutely.” When the meaning <strong>of</strong><br />

the word depends upon the context, as in the<br />

same, the like, the latter, some grammarians<br />

say that the adjective is being used “pronominally.”<br />

As we have seen, a noun can be qualified<br />

by an adjective even when the noun is not<br />

expressed. The fact that we can use an adjective<br />

before a word, as in the miserable poor,<br />

the fortunate rich, does not prove that the<br />

word is a noun. The adjectives, miserable and<br />

fortunate, may apply to an unexpressed noun<br />

such as men. On the other hand, a noun cannot<br />

be qualified by an adverb and an adjective<br />

can. The fact that adverbs can be used before<br />

such words, as in the miserably poor, the<br />

extremely rich, shows that they are still felt as<br />

adjectives. Sometimes this is the only test <strong>of</strong><br />

whether or not a word has become a noun.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the adjectives that are used as<br />

nouns either (1) name a quality, such as the<br />

small, the pleasant, the new, and refer to<br />

everything that has that quality, or (2) name<br />

a group <strong>of</strong> human beings having a certain<br />

characteristic, such as the wise, the powerful,<br />

the unborn. Adjectives in the first class, that<br />

name a quality, are always treated as singulars<br />

although they refer to countless examples <strong>of</strong><br />

the quality. At one time such words were felt<br />

as plurals. Pope said, be not the first by whom<br />

the new are tried. But today we say the best<br />

is the cheapest in the long run, the unknown<br />

is always frightening, the familiar is comfortable.<br />

Words <strong>of</strong> the second class also name a<br />

quality. But they refer to a group <strong>of</strong> human<br />

beings who are identified by this characteristic.<br />

They do not refer to the quality itself or to the<br />

individuals as instances <strong>of</strong> the quality. Words<br />

<strong>of</strong> this kind are usually treated as plurals, as<br />

in the lament, the best lack all conviction<br />

while the worst are full <strong>of</strong> passionate intensity<br />

and in there the wicked cease from troubling<br />

and there the wear? are at rest. Bums uses the<br />

singular form in the rigid righteous is a fool,<br />

but this is very rare.<br />

The group that an adjective identifies is not<br />

necessarily as broad, or as timeless, as the<br />

rich, the poor, the wicked, the weary. It may<br />

represent an actual, countable, number <strong>of</strong><br />

people, as it does in the wounded were removed.<br />

When a word has this limited meaning<br />

it may be used with a numeral in speaking <strong>of</strong><br />

some members <strong>of</strong> the group, as in twenty<br />

wounded were removed. When the word is<br />

unlimited in its application it can only be used<br />

in speaking about the entire group. It cannot<br />

be used with a numeral or in speaking <strong>of</strong><br />

some members <strong>of</strong> the group. We cannot say<br />

five wise or five foolish.<br />

There are ten adjectives which are also used<br />

as nouns to name a nationality group. We<br />

speak <strong>of</strong> the British, the English, the Irish, the<br />

Cornish, the Spanish, the Welsh, the Scotch,<br />

the Dutch, the French. and the Manx. (In<br />

speaking <strong>of</strong> other nationality groups we use<br />

words which are primarily nouns, such as<br />

the Poles, the Swedes, the Chinese.) Formerly,<br />

the ten adjective-nouns could be qualified by<br />

a numeral, as in twenty thousand Cornish bold,<br />

but this is no longer true. In present-day<br />

English these words always represent the entire<br />

nation. We may speak <strong>of</strong> the Irish or the<br />

French but not <strong>of</strong> six Irish or six French. In<br />

order to speak <strong>of</strong> the individuals we must<br />

introduce a true noun, such as man, woman,<br />

person.<br />

There are a few adjectives in English that<br />

represent a single individual, such as the accused,<br />

the departed, the beloved. These words<br />

do not have plural forms and under some circumstances<br />

they may be qualified by adverbs,<br />

as in dearly beloved and the lately departed.<br />

This makes them adjectives according to the<br />

definitions adopted in this dictionary and an<br />

exception to the rule that the English adjective<br />

is used to indicate groups and not individuals.<br />

Under a different system <strong>of</strong> definitions these<br />

words could be classed as singular nouns. But<br />

another system would have other problems and<br />

other types <strong>of</strong> words would have to be listed as<br />

exceptions to the rules.<br />

Nouns may be used before other nouns as<br />

qualifiers, as sea in sea wall and horse in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!