A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
adjectives 14<br />
way, as burning hot, howling drunk. We may<br />
still say dead tired and dead certain. Some<br />
words <strong>of</strong> this kind are now in use but are<br />
under attack, such as mighty fine, real clever,<br />
awful nice, right smart, sure good. Whether<br />
they remain standard English or not will depend<br />
on who uses them and who doesn’t. There is no<br />
question <strong>of</strong> logic, or <strong>of</strong> grammatical principles,<br />
involved. If the respected members <strong>of</strong> the community<br />
use these words, the words are respectable,<br />
and if they do not, the words are not.<br />
(See the individual words.)<br />
adjectives as nouns. Nouns may be made from<br />
adjectives, or adjectives may be used as if they<br />
were nouns. Both kinds <strong>of</strong> words can be seen<br />
in the sentence by Fielding, we moderns are to<br />
the ancients what the poor are to the rich. The<br />
words moderns and ancients are made from<br />
adjectives but they are true nouns, if only<br />
because they have been given the ending s<br />
which does not belong to the adjective. A<br />
great many nouns are formed from adjectives<br />
in this way, such as news, slacks, heroics,<br />
economics. In the case. <strong>of</strong> moderns and ancients<br />
the words also have a singular form and the<br />
plural form can be used with a numeral, as in<br />
any modern is worth a hundred ancients. Words<br />
that have both a singular and a plural form<br />
are nouns. Words that have been formed from<br />
adjectives by adding s are also nouns, even<br />
when they do not have the two forms. Neither<br />
<strong>of</strong> these things is true <strong>of</strong> the words rich and<br />
poor. They have the simple form <strong>of</strong> the adjective.<br />
And we cannot speak <strong>of</strong> an individual<br />
one or use the words with a number term<br />
unless we supply the missing noun man, as in<br />
this poor man and three rich men. Adjectives<br />
that appear to be nouns because the noun they<br />
qualify is not expressed are said to be “adjectives<br />
used absolutely.” When the meaning <strong>of</strong><br />
the word depends upon the context, as in the<br />
same, the like, the latter, some grammarians<br />
say that the adjective is being used “pronominally.”<br />
As we have seen, a noun can be qualified<br />
by an adjective even when the noun is not<br />
expressed. The fact that we can use an adjective<br />
before a word, as in the miserable poor,<br />
the fortunate rich, does not prove that the<br />
word is a noun. The adjectives, miserable and<br />
fortunate, may apply to an unexpressed noun<br />
such as men. On the other hand, a noun cannot<br />
be qualified by an adverb and an adjective<br />
can. The fact that adverbs can be used before<br />
such words, as in the miserably poor, the<br />
extremely rich, shows that they are still felt as<br />
adjectives. Sometimes this is the only test <strong>of</strong><br />
whether or not a word has become a noun.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the adjectives that are used as<br />
nouns either (1) name a quality, such as the<br />
small, the pleasant, the new, and refer to<br />
everything that has that quality, or (2) name<br />
a group <strong>of</strong> human beings having a certain<br />
characteristic, such as the wise, the powerful,<br />
the unborn. Adjectives in the first class, that<br />
name a quality, are always treated as singulars<br />
although they refer to countless examples <strong>of</strong><br />
the quality. At one time such words were felt<br />
as plurals. Pope said, be not the first by whom<br />
the new are tried. But today we say the best<br />
is the cheapest in the long run, the unknown<br />
is always frightening, the familiar is comfortable.<br />
Words <strong>of</strong> the second class also name a<br />
quality. But they refer to a group <strong>of</strong> human<br />
beings who are identified by this characteristic.<br />
They do not refer to the quality itself or to the<br />
individuals as instances <strong>of</strong> the quality. Words<br />
<strong>of</strong> this kind are usually treated as plurals, as<br />
in the lament, the best lack all conviction<br />
while the worst are full <strong>of</strong> passionate intensity<br />
and in there the wicked cease from troubling<br />
and there the wear? are at rest. Bums uses the<br />
singular form in the rigid righteous is a fool,<br />
but this is very rare.<br />
The group that an adjective identifies is not<br />
necessarily as broad, or as timeless, as the<br />
rich, the poor, the wicked, the weary. It may<br />
represent an actual, countable, number <strong>of</strong><br />
people, as it does in the wounded were removed.<br />
When a word has this limited meaning<br />
it may be used with a numeral in speaking <strong>of</strong><br />
some members <strong>of</strong> the group, as in twenty<br />
wounded were removed. When the word is<br />
unlimited in its application it can only be used<br />
in speaking about the entire group. It cannot<br />
be used with a numeral or in speaking <strong>of</strong><br />
some members <strong>of</strong> the group. We cannot say<br />
five wise or five foolish.<br />
There are ten adjectives which are also used<br />
as nouns to name a nationality group. We<br />
speak <strong>of</strong> the British, the English, the Irish, the<br />
Cornish, the Spanish, the Welsh, the Scotch,<br />
the Dutch, the French. and the Manx. (In<br />
speaking <strong>of</strong> other nationality groups we use<br />
words which are primarily nouns, such as<br />
the Poles, the Swedes, the Chinese.) Formerly,<br />
the ten adjective-nouns could be qualified by<br />
a numeral, as in twenty thousand Cornish bold,<br />
but this is no longer true. In present-day<br />
English these words always represent the entire<br />
nation. We may speak <strong>of</strong> the Irish or the<br />
French but not <strong>of</strong> six Irish or six French. In<br />
order to speak <strong>of</strong> the individuals we must<br />
introduce a true noun, such as man, woman,<br />
person.<br />
There are a few adjectives in English that<br />
represent a single individual, such as the accused,<br />
the departed, the beloved. These words<br />
do not have plural forms and under some circumstances<br />
they may be qualified by adverbs,<br />
as in dearly beloved and the lately departed.<br />
This makes them adjectives according to the<br />
definitions adopted in this dictionary and an<br />
exception to the rule that the English adjective<br />
is used to indicate groups and not individuals.<br />
Under a different system <strong>of</strong> definitions these<br />
words could be classed as singular nouns. But<br />
another system would have other problems and<br />
other types <strong>of</strong> words would have to be listed as<br />
exceptions to the rules.<br />
Nouns may be used before other nouns as<br />
qualifiers, as sea in sea wall and horse in