A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
splutter 470<br />
the infinitive, as in he decided never to investigate.<br />
The writer who is determined never to split<br />
an infinitive must remember that, with the exception<br />
<strong>of</strong> negative or restrictive adverbs, the<br />
qualifying word cannot be placed earlier than<br />
the to or it will qualify the principal verb instead<br />
<strong>of</strong> the infinitive; and, if it is placed later than<br />
the infinitive, it acquires a special emphasis<br />
which may not be intended. Frequently the only<br />
way to avoid a split infinitive and still write<br />
good English is to avoid the infinitive-and,<br />
with the increasing use <strong>of</strong> the infinitive, avoiding<br />
the infinitive may lead to wordy periphrases<br />
that are not good English.<br />
Those who have no objection to splitting<br />
an infinitive should remember two things. (1)<br />
In a composite infinitive involving the auxiliary<br />
be or have and a participle, the normal position<br />
for the adverb is after the auxiliary and not<br />
before it. That is, to have always thought is the<br />
normal word order and to always have thought<br />
is a variation that adds special emphasis. (See<br />
sentence adverbs.) (2) Any number <strong>of</strong> words<br />
may stand between to and the verb form.<br />
Browning wrote: a scheme to quietly next day<br />
at crow <strong>of</strong> cock cut my own throat. This is<br />
exactly comparable to placing a large number<br />
<strong>of</strong> words between a preposition and its noun<br />
object, as Macaulay does in principles independent<br />
<strong>of</strong>, and indeed almost incompatible<br />
with, the sentiment <strong>of</strong> devoted loyalty. Such<br />
constructions may be used occasionally but<br />
are decidedly tiresome when they become a<br />
mannerism.<br />
splutter; sputter. These words mean pretty much<br />
the same thing, except that sputter suggests<br />
more immediately the idea <strong>of</strong> spitting. The word<br />
means to emit particles <strong>of</strong> anything in an explosive<br />
manner; to eject particles <strong>of</strong> saliva or<br />
food from the mouth in an explosive manner.<br />
Splutter suggests most immediately to talk<br />
hastily and confusedly or incoherently, as in<br />
excitement or embarrassment (He had turned<br />
purple in the face when McDonald’s thumping<br />
on his buck finally produced a great sputtering<br />
roar. The old colonel spluttered with rage us<br />
the soldiers drugged him from the room). This<br />
distinction, however, is not hard and fast.<br />
spoil. The past tense is spoiled or spoilt. The participle<br />
is also spoiled or spoilt. In the United<br />
States the form spoiled is preferred for the past<br />
tense and the participle. In Great Britain spoiled<br />
is also the preferred form in written English.<br />
spoilage; spoliation; spoilation. Spoilage is the<br />
act <strong>of</strong> spoiling or that which is spoiled (Failure<br />
to ice the refrigerator cars resulted in heavy<br />
spoilage). In printing spoilage has the special<br />
meaning <strong>of</strong> paper spoiled or wasted in presswork.<br />
Spoilation is not listed in most dictionaries,<br />
though it would seem to be a natural formation.<br />
Spoliution is the act <strong>of</strong> spoiling, but properly<br />
and strictly <strong>of</strong> despoiling-that is <strong>of</strong> plundering,<br />
pillaging (This pillaging and spoliution <strong>of</strong> their<br />
ships and goods was furiously resented). In law<br />
it means the intentional destruction <strong>of</strong> or<br />
tampering with a document in such a way as to<br />
impair its value as evidence. William Allen<br />
White’s use <strong>of</strong> spoilution (An era <strong>of</strong> gorgeous<br />
spoilution, a time when bombast concealed<br />
larceny) would seem, plainly, to be an erroneous<br />
substitution for spoliution. But since the<br />
acts to which he is referring took place under<br />
the system known as The Spoils System and<br />
since spoliution is not in the common reader’s<br />
vocabulary and spoils, in this sense, is well<br />
known, it would be pedantic to say that he was<br />
not justified.<br />
spoilt. See spoil.<br />
spoke; spoken. See speak.<br />
sport; sports. Both forms <strong>of</strong> this word are used in<br />
speaking <strong>of</strong> sport in general, and both forms<br />
are used as the first element in a compound, as<br />
in u sport shirt and u sports shirt. The form<br />
with a final s is required in a word referring to<br />
human beings, such as sportsman, sports writer,<br />
and is generally preferred in other compounds,<br />
such as sportscar.<br />
sports English. Many terms drawn from sports<br />
have entered into our speech and become so<br />
common that one is not always aware <strong>of</strong> their<br />
origin. From cockfighting come well-heeled,<br />
crestfallen, yellow-streak and show the white<br />
feather. From archery, to hit the bull’s eye,<br />
second string, and many other terms. From<br />
billiards. behind the eipht bull. From boxinn.<br />
to throw in the towel, -hitting below the beE;<br />
and so on. From horseracing, to have the whip<br />
hand, the inside truck, neck and neck, dark<br />
horse, and so on. From baseball, to throw a<br />
curve, to catch <strong>of</strong>f base, windup, two strikes<br />
against him, etc. Thousands <strong>of</strong> words have come<br />
into the language from sports, and where they<br />
have come naturally and filled a need, they have<br />
enriched our speech.<br />
The language <strong>of</strong> sports writers, however, is<br />
another matter. Their daily effusions are peculiarly<br />
circumscribed, much more so than the<br />
language <strong>of</strong> almost any other specialized field.<br />
In the arts, in the social sciences, in business,<br />
in science and in everyday relationships, there<br />
is a constant growth and change in language<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> new concepts,<br />
new methods and new associations. But in sports<br />
there are basically only two things to talk about<br />
-contests and records. Interest in sports is one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the lower common denominators among<br />
various groups throughout our society. Desirable<br />
as this may be from a democratic viewpoint,<br />
it compels sports writers to use simple<br />
words and a limited vocabulary.<br />
Because it deals with struggle, sports writing<br />
is required to be vigorous, and because it scorns<br />
formality it must be slangy and colloquial. But<br />
slang is particularly unfitted for frequent repetition<br />
and sports writing is, above any other type<br />
<strong>of</strong> contemporary writing, repetitious, laden with<br />
clichts. The wretched sports writer, with slight<br />
material and <strong>of</strong>ten (one suspects) even slighter<br />
interest, is compelled to assume concern he does<br />
not feel and to conceal his yawns under forced<br />
shouts <strong>of</strong> simulated excitement. A tyrannical