19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

splutter 470<br />

the infinitive, as in he decided never to investigate.<br />

The writer who is determined never to split<br />

an infinitive must remember that, with the exception<br />

<strong>of</strong> negative or restrictive adverbs, the<br />

qualifying word cannot be placed earlier than<br />

the to or it will qualify the principal verb instead<br />

<strong>of</strong> the infinitive; and, if it is placed later than<br />

the infinitive, it acquires a special emphasis<br />

which may not be intended. Frequently the only<br />

way to avoid a split infinitive and still write<br />

good English is to avoid the infinitive-and,<br />

with the increasing use <strong>of</strong> the infinitive, avoiding<br />

the infinitive may lead to wordy periphrases<br />

that are not good English.<br />

Those who have no objection to splitting<br />

an infinitive should remember two things. (1)<br />

In a composite infinitive involving the auxiliary<br />

be or have and a participle, the normal position<br />

for the adverb is after the auxiliary and not<br />

before it. That is, to have always thought is the<br />

normal word order and to always have thought<br />

is a variation that adds special emphasis. (See<br />

sentence adverbs.) (2) Any number <strong>of</strong> words<br />

may stand between to and the verb form.<br />

Browning wrote: a scheme to quietly next day<br />

at crow <strong>of</strong> cock cut my own throat. This is<br />

exactly comparable to placing a large number<br />

<strong>of</strong> words between a preposition and its noun<br />

object, as Macaulay does in principles independent<br />

<strong>of</strong>, and indeed almost incompatible<br />

with, the sentiment <strong>of</strong> devoted loyalty. Such<br />

constructions may be used occasionally but<br />

are decidedly tiresome when they become a<br />

mannerism.<br />

splutter; sputter. These words mean pretty much<br />

the same thing, except that sputter suggests<br />

more immediately the idea <strong>of</strong> spitting. The word<br />

means to emit particles <strong>of</strong> anything in an explosive<br />

manner; to eject particles <strong>of</strong> saliva or<br />

food from the mouth in an explosive manner.<br />

Splutter suggests most immediately to talk<br />

hastily and confusedly or incoherently, as in<br />

excitement or embarrassment (He had turned<br />

purple in the face when McDonald’s thumping<br />

on his buck finally produced a great sputtering<br />

roar. The old colonel spluttered with rage us<br />

the soldiers drugged him from the room). This<br />

distinction, however, is not hard and fast.<br />

spoil. The past tense is spoiled or spoilt. The participle<br />

is also spoiled or spoilt. In the United<br />

States the form spoiled is preferred for the past<br />

tense and the participle. In Great Britain spoiled<br />

is also the preferred form in written English.<br />

spoilage; spoliation; spoilation. Spoilage is the<br />

act <strong>of</strong> spoiling or that which is spoiled (Failure<br />

to ice the refrigerator cars resulted in heavy<br />

spoilage). In printing spoilage has the special<br />

meaning <strong>of</strong> paper spoiled or wasted in presswork.<br />

Spoilation is not listed in most dictionaries,<br />

though it would seem to be a natural formation.<br />

Spoliution is the act <strong>of</strong> spoiling, but properly<br />

and strictly <strong>of</strong> despoiling-that is <strong>of</strong> plundering,<br />

pillaging (This pillaging and spoliution <strong>of</strong> their<br />

ships and goods was furiously resented). In law<br />

it means the intentional destruction <strong>of</strong> or<br />

tampering with a document in such a way as to<br />

impair its value as evidence. William Allen<br />

White’s use <strong>of</strong> spoilution (An era <strong>of</strong> gorgeous<br />

spoilution, a time when bombast concealed<br />

larceny) would seem, plainly, to be an erroneous<br />

substitution for spoliution. But since the<br />

acts to which he is referring took place under<br />

the system known as The Spoils System and<br />

since spoliution is not in the common reader’s<br />

vocabulary and spoils, in this sense, is well<br />

known, it would be pedantic to say that he was<br />

not justified.<br />

spoilt. See spoil.<br />

spoke; spoken. See speak.<br />

sport; sports. Both forms <strong>of</strong> this word are used in<br />

speaking <strong>of</strong> sport in general, and both forms<br />

are used as the first element in a compound, as<br />

in u sport shirt and u sports shirt. The form<br />

with a final s is required in a word referring to<br />

human beings, such as sportsman, sports writer,<br />

and is generally preferred in other compounds,<br />

such as sportscar.<br />

sports English. Many terms drawn from sports<br />

have entered into our speech and become so<br />

common that one is not always aware <strong>of</strong> their<br />

origin. From cockfighting come well-heeled,<br />

crestfallen, yellow-streak and show the white<br />

feather. From archery, to hit the bull’s eye,<br />

second string, and many other terms. From<br />

billiards. behind the eipht bull. From boxinn.<br />

to throw in the towel, -hitting below the beE;<br />

and so on. From horseracing, to have the whip<br />

hand, the inside truck, neck and neck, dark<br />

horse, and so on. From baseball, to throw a<br />

curve, to catch <strong>of</strong>f base, windup, two strikes<br />

against him, etc. Thousands <strong>of</strong> words have come<br />

into the language from sports, and where they<br />

have come naturally and filled a need, they have<br />

enriched our speech.<br />

The language <strong>of</strong> sports writers, however, is<br />

another matter. Their daily effusions are peculiarly<br />

circumscribed, much more so than the<br />

language <strong>of</strong> almost any other specialized field.<br />

In the arts, in the social sciences, in business,<br />

in science and in everyday relationships, there<br />

is a constant growth and change in language<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> new concepts,<br />

new methods and new associations. But in sports<br />

there are basically only two things to talk about<br />

-contests and records. Interest in sports is one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the lower common denominators among<br />

various groups throughout our society. Desirable<br />

as this may be from a democratic viewpoint,<br />

it compels sports writers to use simple<br />

words and a limited vocabulary.<br />

Because it deals with struggle, sports writing<br />

is required to be vigorous, and because it scorns<br />

formality it must be slangy and colloquial. But<br />

slang is particularly unfitted for frequent repetition<br />

and sports writing is, above any other type<br />

<strong>of</strong> contemporary writing, repetitious, laden with<br />

clichts. The wretched sports writer, with slight<br />

material and <strong>of</strong>ten (one suspects) even slighter<br />

interest, is compelled to assume concern he does<br />

not feel and to conceal his yawns under forced<br />

shouts <strong>of</strong> simulated excitement. A tyrannical

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!