19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The plural <strong>of</strong> the word for mother is mammal<br />

(The children with their mammas in the park).<br />

The plural <strong>of</strong> the anatomical word is mammae.<br />

mammoth, strictly speaking, designates a large,<br />

extinct species <strong>of</strong> elephant, the northern woolly<br />

mammoth, which resembled the present Indian<br />

elephant but had a hairy coat and long, curved<br />

tusks. More broadly, it designates any <strong>of</strong> various<br />

related extinct species <strong>of</strong> elephant.<br />

By extension mammoth has come to be used<br />

as an adjective for anything huge or gigantic<br />

(Plans for the production <strong>of</strong> a mammoth amusement<br />

park, dwarfing all others, etc.). Some grammarians,<br />

especially English authors, have objected<br />

strenuously to the use <strong>of</strong> mammoth as<br />

an adjective, but Americans, whose way <strong>of</strong> life<br />

makes much greater demands for superlatives,<br />

have accepted it as standard (Mammoth sale<br />

opens this morning, The mammoth parade began<br />

at Third and Main and extended beyond<br />

Twelfth Street). This adjectival use <strong>of</strong> mammoth<br />

has been taken up even by the august National<br />

Geographic Magazine which (in July, 1947)<br />

turned it back into a noun (Electric-drive mammoths<br />

are now being turned out by assemblyline<br />

methods).<br />

man. The plural is men. Nouns ending in -man<br />

have plurals ending in -men whenever the first<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the noun is itself a meaningful English<br />

word, as in Englishman, juryman, chessman.<br />

When the first part <strong>of</strong> a noun ending in -man is<br />

not a true English word, the whole has a regular<br />

plural in s, as in Germans, Romans, Ottomans:<br />

the only exception is women.<br />

Compounds that have man as a qualifying element,<br />

and that actually refer to certain classes <strong>of</strong><br />

men, have the form men in the plural, as in menservants,<br />

men friends, men dancers. This is contrary<br />

to the usual practice in English, according<br />

to which the first element in a compound is singular<br />

even when the whole is plural, as in maidservants,<br />

boy friend.s, girl dancers. When a compound<br />

that has man as a qualifying element<br />

means something other than a class <strong>of</strong> men, it<br />

follows the general rule and keeps the singular<br />

man in the plural, as in man-hours and manholes.<br />

When the first element <strong>of</strong> a compound is not<br />

a qualifier but the object <strong>of</strong> the second element,<br />

only the singular form man may be used, as in<br />

man-eaters and man haters.<br />

When man is the second element in a compound<br />

meaning a certain kind <strong>of</strong> man, a preceding<br />

noun usually has a final s, as in sportsman,<br />

statesman, craftsman.<br />

The words man and men, when used generically,<br />

may be ambiguous. Either word may be<br />

used to mean the human race, as in man is born<br />

unto trouble as the sparks fly upward and the<br />

best laid schemes <strong>of</strong> mice and men. But they may<br />

also be used to mean the males only, as in man<br />

is destined to be a prey to woman and men were<br />

deceivers ever. The singular man is used more<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten to mean the race, and the plural men, to<br />

mean the males. But this rule is not followed<br />

consistently. When the context does not show<br />

that only the male is meant, it will generally be<br />

assumed that men includes women, regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

what the author may have had in mind, as when<br />

Milton undertook to justify the ways <strong>of</strong> God to<br />

men. See gentleman.<br />

man after my own heart. It was David whom<br />

God chose when He sought him a man after his<br />

own heart to replace the errant Saul. But all remembrance<br />

<strong>of</strong> this, with its sadness and solemnity,<br />

has faded from the phrase which is now<br />

merely a cliche for anyone who happens to agree<br />

with us.<br />

man in the street. Whether one describes the ordinary<br />

man as the man in the street or the extraordinary<br />

man as a man <strong>of</strong> parts or an imaginary<br />

adversary, wholly unreal, as a man <strong>of</strong> straw or a<br />

wealthy man as a man <strong>of</strong> substance or a military<br />

leader who acquires such influence over the<br />

people as to threaten the existence <strong>of</strong> the government<br />

as a man on horseback, one is employing a<br />

clicht. They are all hackneyed phrases, faded<br />

and worn, devoid <strong>of</strong> any clear and vigorous<br />

meaning.<br />

man <strong>of</strong> letters; author; writer. Partridge says that<br />

in England an author is a writer <strong>of</strong> fiction, a<br />

writer is a writer <strong>of</strong> fiction, history, biography<br />

and belles lettres, a man <strong>of</strong> letters is a writer <strong>of</strong><br />

any or all <strong>of</strong> these or <strong>of</strong> poetry or works <strong>of</strong><br />

scholarship. He feels that man <strong>of</strong> letters should<br />

be avoided as pretentious. Author, he thinks, has<br />

a dusty connotation, turning up chiefly in legal<br />

and <strong>of</strong>ficial and semi-<strong>of</strong>ficial documents, club<br />

titles, income-tax forms, and the like. Of the<br />

three terms, he feels writer to be the least invidious<br />

and hence the most generally useful.<br />

In America man <strong>of</strong> letters is seldom used. It<br />

would be understood but would seem stiff and<br />

pompous. Author designates one who writes a<br />

novel, poem, or essay (a more inclusive term<br />

than in Britain), the composer <strong>of</strong> a literary work<br />

as distinguished from a compiler, translator, editor,<br />

or copyist. Writer has a more general meaning<br />

and, as in England, is the most used <strong>of</strong> the<br />

terms. It describes one who expresses ideas in<br />

writing, one engaged in literary work, one who<br />

writes, one whose occupation is writing. In the<br />

movies, radio, and television, writer means one<br />

who prepares the script. It is a regular title and<br />

one, by the way, which is not very high in the<br />

vast hierarchy <strong>of</strong> production. An author would<br />

be thought <strong>of</strong> as the man who wrote the story<br />

upon which the movie or script is based, a writer<br />

the man who adapted it for movie or television<br />

use. Distinguished authors have <strong>of</strong>ten worked as<br />

writers in Hollywood.<br />

manage. See handle.<br />

mandatary; mandatory. Mandatary is a noun. It<br />

describes a person or nation holding a mandate<br />

(The congressman regards himself as mandatary<br />

<strong>of</strong> his constituents. On the award <strong>of</strong> the League<br />

<strong>of</strong> Nations, the Union <strong>of</strong> South Africa became<br />

mandatary over the former German colony).<br />

Mandatory may be used as an adjective or as<br />

a noun. It means pertaining to, <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong>,<br />

or containing a mandate. In America it is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

used to mean obligatory or compulsory (The invitation<br />

was actually mandatory; the cadet was

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!