A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The plural <strong>of</strong> the word for mother is mammal<br />
(The children with their mammas in the park).<br />
The plural <strong>of</strong> the anatomical word is mammae.<br />
mammoth, strictly speaking, designates a large,<br />
extinct species <strong>of</strong> elephant, the northern woolly<br />
mammoth, which resembled the present Indian<br />
elephant but had a hairy coat and long, curved<br />
tusks. More broadly, it designates any <strong>of</strong> various<br />
related extinct species <strong>of</strong> elephant.<br />
By extension mammoth has come to be used<br />
as an adjective for anything huge or gigantic<br />
(Plans for the production <strong>of</strong> a mammoth amusement<br />
park, dwarfing all others, etc.). Some grammarians,<br />
especially English authors, have objected<br />
strenuously to the use <strong>of</strong> mammoth as<br />
an adjective, but Americans, whose way <strong>of</strong> life<br />
makes much greater demands for superlatives,<br />
have accepted it as standard (Mammoth sale<br />
opens this morning, The mammoth parade began<br />
at Third and Main and extended beyond<br />
Twelfth Street). This adjectival use <strong>of</strong> mammoth<br />
has been taken up even by the august National<br />
Geographic Magazine which (in July, 1947)<br />
turned it back into a noun (Electric-drive mammoths<br />
are now being turned out by assemblyline<br />
methods).<br />
man. The plural is men. Nouns ending in -man<br />
have plurals ending in -men whenever the first<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the noun is itself a meaningful English<br />
word, as in Englishman, juryman, chessman.<br />
When the first part <strong>of</strong> a noun ending in -man is<br />
not a true English word, the whole has a regular<br />
plural in s, as in Germans, Romans, Ottomans:<br />
the only exception is women.<br />
Compounds that have man as a qualifying element,<br />
and that actually refer to certain classes <strong>of</strong><br />
men, have the form men in the plural, as in menservants,<br />
men friends, men dancers. This is contrary<br />
to the usual practice in English, according<br />
to which the first element in a compound is singular<br />
even when the whole is plural, as in maidservants,<br />
boy friend.s, girl dancers. When a compound<br />
that has man as a qualifying element<br />
means something other than a class <strong>of</strong> men, it<br />
follows the general rule and keeps the singular<br />
man in the plural, as in man-hours and manholes.<br />
When the first element <strong>of</strong> a compound is not<br />
a qualifier but the object <strong>of</strong> the second element,<br />
only the singular form man may be used, as in<br />
man-eaters and man haters.<br />
When man is the second element in a compound<br />
meaning a certain kind <strong>of</strong> man, a preceding<br />
noun usually has a final s, as in sportsman,<br />
statesman, craftsman.<br />
The words man and men, when used generically,<br />
may be ambiguous. Either word may be<br />
used to mean the human race, as in man is born<br />
unto trouble as the sparks fly upward and the<br />
best laid schemes <strong>of</strong> mice and men. But they may<br />
also be used to mean the males only, as in man<br />
is destined to be a prey to woman and men were<br />
deceivers ever. The singular man is used more<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten to mean the race, and the plural men, to<br />
mean the males. But this rule is not followed<br />
consistently. When the context does not show<br />
that only the male is meant, it will generally be<br />
assumed that men includes women, regardless <strong>of</strong><br />
what the author may have had in mind, as when<br />
Milton undertook to justify the ways <strong>of</strong> God to<br />
men. See gentleman.<br />
man after my own heart. It was David whom<br />
God chose when He sought him a man after his<br />
own heart to replace the errant Saul. But all remembrance<br />
<strong>of</strong> this, with its sadness and solemnity,<br />
has faded from the phrase which is now<br />
merely a cliche for anyone who happens to agree<br />
with us.<br />
man in the street. Whether one describes the ordinary<br />
man as the man in the street or the extraordinary<br />
man as a man <strong>of</strong> parts or an imaginary<br />
adversary, wholly unreal, as a man <strong>of</strong> straw or a<br />
wealthy man as a man <strong>of</strong> substance or a military<br />
leader who acquires such influence over the<br />
people as to threaten the existence <strong>of</strong> the government<br />
as a man on horseback, one is employing a<br />
clicht. They are all hackneyed phrases, faded<br />
and worn, devoid <strong>of</strong> any clear and vigorous<br />
meaning.<br />
man <strong>of</strong> letters; author; writer. Partridge says that<br />
in England an author is a writer <strong>of</strong> fiction, a<br />
writer is a writer <strong>of</strong> fiction, history, biography<br />
and belles lettres, a man <strong>of</strong> letters is a writer <strong>of</strong><br />
any or all <strong>of</strong> these or <strong>of</strong> poetry or works <strong>of</strong><br />
scholarship. He feels that man <strong>of</strong> letters should<br />
be avoided as pretentious. Author, he thinks, has<br />
a dusty connotation, turning up chiefly in legal<br />
and <strong>of</strong>ficial and semi-<strong>of</strong>ficial documents, club<br />
titles, income-tax forms, and the like. Of the<br />
three terms, he feels writer to be the least invidious<br />
and hence the most generally useful.<br />
In America man <strong>of</strong> letters is seldom used. It<br />
would be understood but would seem stiff and<br />
pompous. Author designates one who writes a<br />
novel, poem, or essay (a more inclusive term<br />
than in Britain), the composer <strong>of</strong> a literary work<br />
as distinguished from a compiler, translator, editor,<br />
or copyist. Writer has a more general meaning<br />
and, as in England, is the most used <strong>of</strong> the<br />
terms. It describes one who expresses ideas in<br />
writing, one engaged in literary work, one who<br />
writes, one whose occupation is writing. In the<br />
movies, radio, and television, writer means one<br />
who prepares the script. It is a regular title and<br />
one, by the way, which is not very high in the<br />
vast hierarchy <strong>of</strong> production. An author would<br />
be thought <strong>of</strong> as the man who wrote the story<br />
upon which the movie or script is based, a writer<br />
the man who adapted it for movie or television<br />
use. Distinguished authors have <strong>of</strong>ten worked as<br />
writers in Hollywood.<br />
manage. See handle.<br />
mandatary; mandatory. Mandatary is a noun. It<br />
describes a person or nation holding a mandate<br />
(The congressman regards himself as mandatary<br />
<strong>of</strong> his constituents. On the award <strong>of</strong> the League<br />
<strong>of</strong> Nations, the Union <strong>of</strong> South Africa became<br />
mandatary over the former German colony).<br />
Mandatory may be used as an adjective or as<br />
a noun. It means pertaining to, <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong>,<br />
or containing a mandate. In America it is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
used to mean obligatory or compulsory (The invitation<br />
was actually mandatory; the cadet was